Democrats Are Repudiating FDR’s Precedent of Détente With Russia

[AndroidHero]

Killing foreign world leaders, fomenting radical Islam due to leadership voids in majority Muslim countries, bombing, terrorizing and droning random people due to a war on an extreme emotion 'terror!' is not equal to bots posting on social media man. Get some perspective.

Who said they are equal? stop with the straw-man argument.

 

[AndroidHero]

John: We need to invest in social programs.
Steve: What is needed for that?
John: Money
Steve: But didn't you sign almost 7Billion Dollars in war?
John: Ya... so?

You always post useless and incomprehensible things.

 

[NYSTATEOFMIND]

Who said they co-singed this? aside from increase in military spending Democrats don't support decreased in social programs or decrease in regulations and they definitely don't support building that stupid wall.

There is a list online of the democrats who signed off on it...it includes Elizabeth Warren
there is an old video online where Hillary Clinton speaks of building an additional physical border along the Mexican border...and there is this

 

[AnonymityX1000]

Who said they are equal? stop with the straw-man argument.

One is waaay more concerning than the other. to me at least. It's not even worth mentioning in this argument. White people needed bots to tell them to hate BLM?! Really?! How did they feel about Black people before the bots? lol

 

[AndroidHero]

There is a list online of the democrats who signed off on it...it includes Elizabeth Warren

Yes on military spending which is disappointing but not unexpected, but not on decreasing regulations, cutting social programs and the wall.

 

[Pressure]

ummm...Trump is a repulican...the DEMOCRATS...are suppose to be the adversarial party- my question is why did the adversarial party co-sign these bullet points

89% of Senate Democrats Help Pass The $696.5B Defense Bill

Um . . no. Why are you? lol

I'm not, but they told you exactly why they voted for an increase and the programs they allocated that money for:

The bill’s approval in the upper chamber came two months after the House passed its $696.5 billion defense policy bill for fiscal 2018. From September 2017:

The Senate’s NDAA version would authorize the procurement of 10 more Boeing-built F/A-18 Super Hornet aircraft, 24 additional Lockheed Martin-made F-35 fighter jets and five more ships for the U.S. Navy.

The measure would also create a new chief information warfare officer at DoD and oppose the creation of a new space-focused service branch proposed in the House bill.

The Washington Post also reported that the Senate bill would ban the use of software from Russian company Kaspersky Lab across federal agencies, military branches and government contractors.

I gave a list of 4 things, one that was already approved and the other 3 they literally shut the government down over.

 

[NYSTATEOFMIND]

There is a list online of the democrats who signed off on it...it includes Elizabeth Warren

I'm not, but they told you exactly why they voted for an increase and the programs they allocated that money for:



I gave a list of 4 things, one that was already approved and the other 3 they literally shut the government down over.

Bruh dont laugh at my shyt...its sad what they doing to us....ahh fukk it

 

[Pressure]

There is a list online of the democrats who signed off on it...it includes Elizabeth Warren
there is an old video online where Hillary Clinton speaks of building an additional physical border along the Mexican border...and there is this

Mulvaney: Schumer Only Offered to 'Authorize' Wall Funding Not Actually Spend Money - Breitbart

 

[Pressure]

Bruh dont laugh at my shyt...its sad what they doing to us....ahh fukk it

The shyt made me laugh. It wasn't even meant to be insulting.

Real talk, military spending isn't the reason the government doesn't spend on social programs. How do I know this, after increasing the Defense budget to almost 700Billion republicans then decided to add 1.5 trillion to the national debt through tax cuts. We've already see they were willing to further the deficit they just weren't willing to do it over social programs. This is what you get when republicans control all three chambers of government,

 

[NYSTATEOFMIND]

Yes on military spending which is disappointing but not unexpected, but not on decreasing regulations, cutting social programs and the wall.

ummm think again...i added to this post....you REALLY think the democrats are against decreased regulations? It was a democrat who got rid of Glass Stegal which allowed Investment Banks and Commercial banks to merge and gamble with risky derivative products that crashed the economy (ohh that was Bill Clinton btw)

also- you say "its disappointing" but thats is a big deal for me, dems scream that Trump is the devil himself- unfit to be president YET- they give him 70 billion dollars AND increase his spying capabilities on AMERICANS...I didnt even touch that topic yet.

 

[NYSTATEOFMIND]

Mulvaney: Schumer Only Offered to 'Authorize' Wall Funding Not Actually Spend Money - Breitbart

thats fair- it almost seems like semantics but I dont trust Chuck. These politicians are spinless

 

[Pressure]

thats fair- it almost seems like semantics but I dont trust Chuck. These politicians are spinless

I agrea. If you look back I said such. That I'd like them to shut it down and do so for a while to show they were serious.

I also assumed they'd fold though.

Getting chips funding for six years is something that shoush have been talked up more, but it is a win.

Dreamers are likely fukked despite the majority of all Americans supporting a path to citizenship. Blame republicans

 

[NYSTATEOFMIND]

I agrea. If you look back I said such. That I'd like them to shut it down and do so for a while to show they were serious.

I also assumed they'd fold though.

Getting chips funding for six years is something that shoush have been talked up more, but it is a win.

Dreamers are likely fukked despite the majority of all Americans supporting a path to citizenship. Blame republicans

The DACA / Dreamer saga is something I havent followed as close but sounded like the Dems had leverage bc its supported by most of Americans- yet Chucky caved in...im shocked
At least SOME of the dems are kinda fighting for NET neutrality ..everyone needs their Pornhub

 

[the next guy]

I just want to see the result of the russia investigation at this point, that's all.

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

The DACA / Dreamer saga is something I havent followed as close but sounded like the Dems had leverage bc its supported by most of Americans- yet Chucky caved in...im shocked
At least SOME of the dems are kinda fighting for NET neutrality ..everyone needs their Pornhub

Democrats are hypocrites though. Let's be real.
They are for DACA Dreamers, Syria refugees and against the muslim Ban but they will continue to elect politicians that destroy their country.
It's like ya i'll vote for a democrat that is pro-war and even re-elect him after he expands the war but god help me I will be against anyone who is not for allowing citizens of the country we fukk to come here. Such nonsense.

Net Neutrality is very important yes