Democrats Need To Respect The Black Voters Putting Them In Power

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,408
Reputation
2,040
Daps
67,375
Reppin
Everywhere
December 15 2017, 10:26 a.m.
Shaun King
CHARLES BARKLEY GOT IT RIGHT: DEMOCRATS NEED TO RESPECT THE BLACK VOTERS PUTTING THEM IN POWER


Barkley’s remarks about the Democrats came about in an odd way. CNN host Jake Tapper asked Barkley what his message for President Donald Trump would be. But Barkley took it in another direction:

Well, this is a wakeup call for Democrats. … They’ve taken the black vote and the poor vote for granted for a long time. It’s time for them to get off their ass and start making life better for black folks and people who are poor.

They’ve always had our votes, and they have abused our votes and this is a wakeup call. We’ve got it in a great position now, but this is a wakeup call for Democrats to do better for black people and poor white people.

While all indications are that poor white people in Alabama voted overwhelmingly for Moore in the election and show strong support for Trump in general, no voting bloc has been more faithful to the Democratic Party with less to show for it than African-Americans.

Among Alabama voters, an astounding 98 percent of black women cast their vote for Jones, according to exit polls. And 93 percent of black men who voted also cast their vote for Jones.

No other constituency or demographic came close to this type of support on either side. White men without college degrees, for instance, constituted Moore’s strongest demographic of support — but only came in at 79 percent support.

For Jones to narrowly eke out a win took near unanimous black support and turnout in black communities — support and turnout levels that appear to rival even former President Barack Obama’s landmark 2008 election.

Barkley is right that there’s an imbalance in the way black folks turn out for Democrats like Jones versus the way those Democrats then turn around and treat them. Unlike Obama’s election, the black vote is in essence used by Democrats to advance white politicians’ power.

Consider these facts: The United States does not have a single black governor of the 50 states; only one of the 50 states currently has an African-American attorney general; just two African-American Democrats serve in the United States Senate — two!

And it’s not just the politicians themselves, these imbalances are built into the power structures politicians have built around themselves, too. Every United States senator has a chief of staff. Guess how many of those are black? Two! And both of them are Republicans! Each U.S. senator has a communications director; only one is black, and he also works for a Republican. Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez recently posted a photo of the last crop of interns to work for the party — and almost all the faces were white.

It is abusive for the Democratic Party to require a level of support from African-Americans normally only seen in dictatorships, then proceed to put black folk at the back of every line in terms of leadership and policy.
The problem runs from the rank and file all the way to the top of the national Democratic Party. The House minority leader is white and so is the Senate minority leader.

The disparity between the loyalty of black voters and Democrats’ efforts to bring them into the circles of political and financial power extends to the way the party spends its money. Of the $759 million the Democratic Party spent on contractors back in 2010, a dismal 1.5 percent was spent on African-American groups.

So yes, Charles Barkley was right: “They have abused our votes.” It is abusive for the Democratic Party to require a level of support from African-Americans normally only seen in dictatorships, then proceed to put black folk at the back of every line in terms of leadership and policy.

The Democratic Party is clearly expecting a wave of support to carry them into power in 2018. There are already rumors that the political classes want to call it a “blue wave.” But there’s a better name: the black wave. The reason is simple: The wave won’t come at all without black votes. But like all large waves in the ocean, the Democrats better learn to respect the black wave that keeps their political hopes afloat: The days of black votes without black power need to come to an end.

Correction: Dec. 15, 2017
An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that there are no black attorneys general. Indiana’s attorney general, Curtis T. Hill Jr., a Republican, is an African-American.

Charles Barkley Got It Right: Democrats Need to Respect the Black Voters Putting Them in Power
 

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,408
Reputation
2,040
Daps
67,375
Reppin
Everywhere
Thought this was an interesting article based on the recent election in Alabama and the lack of diversity in the current Trump administration.

According to the bolded King points out the Dems have a lot of explaining to do also. But I also wonder if a lot of black political positions are filled in at the local levels in areas where we are more prevalent.
 

kevm3

follower of Jesus
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,317
Reputation
5,595
Daps
83,659
The democrats or any political party aren't going to do anything you don't force them to. They know blacks go like lemmings to the polls and punch in Democrat on the ballot, so why should they give us anything? You better make them compete for the vote.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
91,171
Reputation
3,781
Daps
162,667
Reppin
Brooklyn
Pretty bad metrics to use although black representation should be higher if not as elected officials(if not possible) but at least as staff

The disparity between the loyalty of black voters and Democrats’ efforts to bring them into the circles of political and financial power extends to the way the party spends its money. Of the $759 million the Democratic Party spent on contractors back in 2010, a dismal 1.5 percent was spent on African-American groups.

As far as this goes besides why the fukk we're spending this much....

Where are these events being held and what's holding back contractors there, I suspect a lot of it is historical bs and at the state level.

I think there should be proportioned rate handed out to minority businesses immediately and answers to why there wasn't before. I know NYS/city do it with their projects to varying effect.


Also I thought this was the identity politics thing that you guys hate?
 

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,408
Reputation
2,040
Daps
67,375
Reppin
Everywhere
Pretty bad metrics to use although black representation should be higher if not as elected officials(if not possible) but at least as staff



As far as this goes besides why the fukk we're spending this much....

Where are these events being held and what's holding back contractors there, I suspect a lot of it is historical bs and at the state level.

I think there should be proportioned rate handed out to minority businesses immediately and answers to why there wasn't before. I know NYS/city do it with their projects to varying effect.


Also I thought this was the identity politics thing that you guys hate?
:usure: This is the same as Tim Kaine speaking Spanish for no reason or Hillary pulling out the southern ebonics when necessary?

I think questioning why the national parties have a lack of black representation is a substantial inquiry that doesn't just fall into the realm of platitudes, no?
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
91,171
Reputation
3,781
Daps
162,667
Reppin
Brooklyn
:usure: This is the same as Tim Kaine speaking Spanish for no reason or Hillary pulling out the southern ebonics when necessary?

I think questioning why the national parties have a lack of black representation is a substantial inquiry that doesn't just fall into the realm of platitudes, no?

I guess it's the same but I frankly see it as a non issue and I don't understand why people dwell on it.


Absolutely.

I think we better keep in mind that the large proportion of this country hasn't moved beyond Jim Crow when we're doing our math.


Anything on my other points?
 

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,408
Reputation
2,040
Daps
67,375
Reppin
Everywhere
I guess it's the same but I frankly see it as a non issue and I don't understand why people dwell on it.


Absolutely.

I think we better keep in mind that the large proportion of this country hasn't moved beyond Jim Crow when we're doing our math.


Anything on my other points?
The whole identity politics thing is a spin to me. Most people's issue is not with appealing to identity but just coming with that and nothing else. But I guess depending where you are on the political spectrum one's policy can be seen as empty or substantive. The divide on that in the Democratic party is interesting because that's all the GOP relies on but in a negative way.

But if Dems are appealing to black people at a 90%+ clip there should be more representation shown to continue growth and sustain their power at the least.

As far as the consultant thing that was all Hillary and her team. Obama had shut all that lobbying shyt down in the DNC but it started back up when she took control. And at the end of the day I can respect Hillary for her power ("don't hate the player hate the game.") but there were millions of people who just weren't gonna rock with her even in the face of a fascist regime.

That needs to be fixed and it'll be easy if a black progressive movement swept the Dems in vain of Obama. We'll see if it happens because they need us if they want to survive as a party.

Edit: Bout to get on a flight but you're point on Jim Crow is true which is why I ponder the numbers locally.
 
Last edited:

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
91,171
Reputation
3,781
Daps
162,667
Reppin
Brooklyn
The whole identity politics thing is a spin to me. Most people's issue is not with appealing to identity but just coming with that and nothing else. But I guess depending where you are on the political spectrum one's policy can be seen as empty or substantive. The divide on that in the Democratic party is interesting because that's all the GOP relies on but in a negative way.

But if Dems are appealing to black people at a 90%+ clip there should be more representation shown to continue growth and sustain their power at the least.

As far as the consultant thing that was all Hillary and her team. Obama had shut all that lobbying shyt down in the DNC but it started back up when she took control. And at the end of the day I can respect Hillary for her power ("don't hate the player hate the game.") but there were millions of people who just weren't gonna rock with her even in the face of a fascist regime.

That needs to be fixed and it'll be easy if a black progressive movement swept the Dems in vain of Obama. We'll see if it happens because they need us if they want to survive as a party.


We're on the same page
My mind has been on construction all day so I'm just realizing the "contractors" were political consultants after what you said :lolbron:

I think someone posted a thread this week with a 400MM price tag. Anyways I'd imagine a lot of that were expenses for software, analytics, god knows what else, and on corporations it's not like they showered nearly a billion dollars on white people.

I'm all for taking money entirely out of politics btw.
 

Colilluminati

TAMRON HALL STAN
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
10,773
Reputation
2,473
Daps
24,192
Reppin
MiddleWest
There are enough whites to keep Republicans in office .

Are there enough whites to keep democrats in office ?

No.
 
Top