Do you consider CP3 and Rondo ball hogs???

Dwight Howard

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
20,940
Reputation
-3,437
Daps
59,650
Reppin
NULL
Can't believe you dudes don't understand the point the threadstarter is making. Ball hogging = hogging the ball. You don't have to shoot to hog the ball, it's common sense. Dribbling out for 18+ seconds is hogging the ball, it's anti-ball movement.
 

Lord Beasley

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
48,448
Reputation
3,801
Daps
95,177
Reppin
469 x 972 x 702
if that's the point she was trying to make, the she shouldn't have included chris paul. personally, i still don't see how he is a ball hog when he finds holes in the defense on a consistent basis. that's mentally exhausting for the other team....
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
53,575
Reputation
3,118
Daps
150,945
technically they're ballhogs, they're ball dominate players. neither would be good off the ball.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,334
Reputation
6,499
Daps
174,669
setting the women sports opinion movement back 20 years with this thread :snoop:
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,793
Reputation
863
Daps
106,213
Threadstarter even says "that leads to an assist" So what is the problem with that? You're mad cuz they run the shot clock down?
Theres no logic to it, its another dumb attempt to defend/justify/exonerate actual ball hog/gunners/volume shooters. Same type of posters will sit there and try to argue how irrelevant assists and fg% are :heh:
 
Top