Do you respect married men that wear wedding rings?

[Ronnie Lott]

I respect the idea and union of marriage. But I don't think men should feel obligated to wear their wedding rings. All the cats I know that are married, my uncles and a few of my homies they don't wear wedding rings and their wives don't seem to mind.


Wearing a ring is almost a submissive act for a dude to do. Some believe that it makes a man look a bit weak. I know many cops have been known to not wear their rings, because they don't want to appear soft or they want to appear to criminals that they have "nothin to lose."

 

[the cac mamba]

I know many cops have been known to not wear their rings

 

[YouLoveMe]

Listen here lad,

Wedding rings don't mean shyt! it just means she has not assailed to being sexually secure.

plus still buys into double standards, that showcase slave mentality.
as, having an issue with having sex and going long periods of time for a female.
who are persued and do not have to hunt.
yet, they can actually hunt and defeat the double standard without damaging their ability to be desired.
binary is not that old yet.
so, it is not a negative.
yet, if she gets older and it continues.
after she has actually assailed into having her cortex solidly formed in the back of her skull to her spine.
imo, i would think she was damaged.

i am not sure how long women have been free in canada.
yet, a grown ass woman can fukk anybody she wants.
as long as she is not charging, a fee.
or in return for some monetary action.
or, allowing herself to be preyed upon.
where it would deem her undesireable.

trains are an action of being preyed upon that can make a woman undesireable.
where no monetary gain has to be present.
a female running a train is not so a female can prove she is macho.
females are not macho, and do not have to strive to be macho.
so, any chick who gains some confidence in taking on some guys in a train.
either has some issues from being molested in her past by multiple people, or violently gang raped.
where she probably is trying to get over the traumatic shock filled experience.
by experiencing it again, in an environment she deems as a controlled and safe situation.
so she can mentally get over the shock and fear of when it happened violently.

that is the only rationale, i can think of for a female to openly pursue having a train ran on them.
if it was not for money.
if a female has not been the victim of a past gang rape/molestation/sodomy, etc.
then, partakes in a train for no money.
that chick definately is damaged,...and broken like tara's theme music coming down the impact zone rampway.



art barr
Dap
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by charmander
the GOAT poster has spoken
Quote:
Originally Posted by killacal
Give this man, Art Barr a nobel peace prize
Quote:
Originally Posted by yseJ
Art Barr has more knowledge in like 5 posts than you do in all of your 37000+
Quote:
Originally Posted by neworleans21
damn art barr u schooled me i learned alot from talking 2 u
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysej
Art Barr's sig > than yo existence breh!
THE MOST PROLIFIC PERSON POSTING ON THE PLANET!

 

[The Coochie Assassin]

I don't really care.

 

[Ronnie Lott]

Listen here lad,

Wedding rings don't mean shyt! it just means she has not assailed to being sexually secure.

plus still buys into double standards, that showcase slave mentality.
as, having an issue with having sex and going long periods of time for a female.
who are persued and do not have to hunt.
yet, they can actually hunt and defeat the double standard without damaging their ability to be desired.
binary is not that old yet.
so, it is not a negative.
yet, if she gets older and it continues.
after she has actually assailed into having her cortex solidly formed in the back of her skull to her spine.
imo, i would think she was damaged.

i am not sure how long women have been free in canada.
yet, a grown ass woman can fukk anybody she wants.
as long as she is not charging, a fee.
or in return for some monetary action.
or, allowing herself to be preyed upon.
where it would deem her undesireable.

trains are an action of being preyed upon that can make a woman undesireable.
where no monetary gain has to be present.
a female running a train is not so a female can prove she is macho.
females are not macho, and do not have to strive to be macho.
so, any chick who gains some confidence in taking on some guys in a train.
either has some issues from being molested in her past by multiple people, or violently gang raped.
where she probably is trying to get over the traumatic shock filled experience.
by experiencing it again, in an environment she deems as a controlled and safe situation.
so she can mentally get over the shock and fear of when it happened violently.

that is the only rationale, i can think of for a female to openly pursue having a train ran on them.
if it was not for money.
if a female has not been the victim of a past gang rape/molestation/sodomy, etc.
then, partakes in a train for no money.
that chick definately is damaged,...and broken like tara's theme music coming down the impact zone rampway.



art barr
Dap
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by charmander
the GOAT poster has spoken
Quote:
Originally Posted by killacal
Give this man, Art Barr a nobel peace prize
Quote:
Originally Posted by yseJ
Art Barr has more knowledge in like 5 posts than you do in all of your 37000+
Quote:
Originally Posted by neworleans21
damn art barr u schooled me i learned alot from talking 2 u
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysej
Art Barr's sig > than yo existence breh!
THE MOST PROLIFIC PERSON POSTING ON THE PLANET!

 

[msims]

I've never heard of this.

If you're proud of your marriage, why not wear it?

A wedding ring is just a symbol of your marriage. Nothing more, nothing less. If you feel less of a man by wearing one, then you may have personal issues that you should probably deal with before getting into a relationship, let alone before getting married.




​

 

[Egomaniacal1]

I respect the idea and union of marriage. But I don't think men should feel obligated to wear their wedding rings. All the cats I know that are married, my uncles and a few of my homies they don't wear wedding rings and their wives don't seem to mind.


Wearing a ring is almost a submissive act for a dude to do. Some believe that it makes a man look a bit weak. I know many cops have been known to not wear their rings, because they don't want to appear soft or they want to appear to criminals that they have "nothin to lose."

You've already submitted when you said the "I do's"...no need after that to cop pleas on why you shouldn't wear the rang.

 

[HookersandIceCream]

Do you think females should wear theirs

 

[Ronnie Lott]

Do you think females should wear theirs

Yes. Double standard. Yes

 

[skeetsinternal]

I always looked at these type cats that wear their wedding rings as being soft. Its like they gave away a testicle to a woman and are now less than their former selves. Men wearing a ring = a win for the female

 

[Ashley Banks]

Yes, I do respect men that wear their wedding rings.

My husband better wear a damn ring.

 

[JP_614]

A wedding ring is a symbol if you dont wear it you still are married right???
imo its the person option but i can respect someone who would symbolize there marriage by wearing it i see no harm

 

[msims]

Yes, I do respect men that wear their wedding rings.

My husband better wear a damn ring.

I will. ​

 

[Soundbwoy]

Whats the point of having a wedding ring and not wearing it and females throw p*ssy at married cats ive seen it

 

[AllHolosEve]

Listen here lad,

Wedding rings don't mean shyt! it just means she has not assailed to being sexually secure.

plus still buys into double standards, that showcase slave mentality.
as, having an issue with having sex and going long periods of time for a female.
who are persued and do not have to hunt.
yet, they can actually hunt and defeat the double standard without damaging their ability to be desired.
binary is not that old yet.
so, it is not a negative.
yet, if she gets older and it continues.
after she has actually assailed into having her cortex solidly formed in the back of her skull to her spine.
imo, i would think she was damaged.

i am not sure how long women have been free in canada.
yet, a grown ass woman can fukk anybody she wants.
as long as she is not charging, a fee.
or in return for some monetary action.
or, allowing herself to be preyed upon.
where it would deem her undesireable.

trains are an action of being preyed upon that can make a woman undesireable.
where no monetary gain has to be present.
a female running a train is not so a female can prove she is macho.
females are not macho, and do not have to strive to be macho.
so, any chick who gains some confidence in taking on some guys in a train.
either has some issues from being molested in her past by multiple people, or violently gang raped.
where she probably is trying to get over the traumatic shock filled experience.
by experiencing it again, in an environment she deems as a controlled and safe situation.
so she can mentally get over the shock and fear of when it happened violently.

that is the only rationale, i can think of for a female to openly pursue having a train ran on them.
if it was not for money.
if a female has not been the victim of a past gang rape/molestation/sodomy, etc.
then, partakes in a train for no money.
that chick definately is damaged,...and broken like tara's theme music coming down the impact zone rampway.



art barr
Dap
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by charmander
the GOAT poster has spoken
Quote:
Originally Posted by killacal
Give this man, Art Barr a nobel peace prize
Quote:
Originally Posted by yseJ
Art Barr has more knowledge in like 5 posts than you do in all of your 37000+
Quote:
Originally Posted by neworleans21
damn art barr u schooled me i learned alot from talking 2 u
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysej
Art Barr's sig > than yo existence breh!
THE MOST PROLIFIC PERSON POSTING ON THE PLANET!

sh!t had me