Does a woman really keep a man’s DNA if he nuts inside of her

[BrothaZay]

 

[lurker emeritus]

i guess that explains that stupid ass justin/jayson tatum thread i read through in the coliseum the other day

 

[MajesticLion]

 

[OneManGang]

It’s not true. End thread.

 

[NoMorePie]

Yes. There is a 'locker' in a corner of the women's stomach called the metabolicalisticism croner that stores male semen and it stays within the system for approximately 89 thousand years.

 

[RamsayBolton]

I actually remember that old story, i had no idea it was later debunked

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-did-not-find-women-store-dna-intercourse-with-men-2024-01-22/

 

[concise]

The first time I came across this theory was reading white nationalist material detailing why white women who had been with black men were beyond saving.

Interesting to see that this theory has now been picked up ... by black men.

 

[lowkey0z]

this is some shyt i'd hear corey holcomb say on his podcast

 

[heavenlywings77]

Jesus Christ. People can't be this silly

 

[KING WILL]

I was on the fence, but hear me out for a second...


If a person that receives an transplant develop different traits from their donor, is 1-2 years of creampies and swaping spit all that different?

 

[King]

Yes. There is a 'locker' in a corner of the women's stomach called the metabolicalisticism croner that stores male semen and it stays within the system for approximately 89 thousand years.

 

[NinoBrown]

Shang Tsung coochies lol

 

[goatmane]

 

[Richard Glidewell]

I was on the fence, but hear me out for a second...


If a person that receives an transplant develop different traits from their donor, is 1-2 years of creampies and swaping spit all that different?

Is
this science?

 

[concise]

I was on the fence, but hear me out for a second...


If a person that receives an transplant develop different traits from their donor, is 1-2 years of creampies and swaping spit all that different?

Yes.


1. You are comparing whole solid organs to fluids.
2. Further research is needed on 1, the other has been debunked multiple times.