Ebola victim's family sues and win

Yapdatfool

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
8,894
Reputation
1,366
Daps
23,534
Reppin
NULL
DALLAS (AP) — The hospital that treated the only Ebola patient to die in the United States will pay his relatives an undisclosed sum and create a charitable foundation in his name, the family's attorney said Wednesday.

Related Stories
  1. Family of Ebola victim reaches settlement with Dallas hospital The Week (RSS)
  2. Texas reaches settlement with Liberian Ebola man's family AFP
  3. WATCH: Nurses Speak Out About Treating The First Ebola Patient Diagnosed In The U.S. Huffington Post
  4. Dallas Ebola Victim’s Family Reaches Agreement With Hospital CBS Dallas Fort Worth (RSS)
  5. Q&A about care of Dallas Ebola patient who died Associated Press
The agreement heads off a lawsuit from relatives of Thomas Eric Duncan, who died Oct. 8 at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas.

Duncan, who arrived in North Texas from Liberia on Sept. 20, was initially sent away from the hospital's emergency room with antibiotics, something Presbyterian administrators have acknowledged was a mistake. He returned to the hospital in an ambulance two days after his release and was quickly diagnosed with possible signs of Ebola, which has killed more than 5,000 people in West Africa.

Attorney Les Weisbrod declined to say at a news conference how much money the family would receive but said the settlement was a "very good deal" that would provide for Duncan's parents and his four children. Weisbrod also said Presbyterian hospital was not charging Duncan's family for his medical treatment. The foundation will assist efforts to fight Ebola in Liberia, he said.

Duncan's nephew, Josephus Weeks, has previously been critical of the care Duncan received, saying his death was partly due to his race, nationality and lack of insurance. But on Wednesday, he credited Presbyterian's officials for moving quickly to settle the case and acknowledge mistakes.

Weeks said he will be "the face of the foundation," which he hopes will lead to a new hospital or the dedication of a hospital wing in Liberia.



View gallery

Josephus Weeks, left, nephew of Thomas Eric Duncan, is introduced by attorney Les Weisbrod during a …
"The main focus is that Eric's name is on something and everybody knows that he didn't die in vain," Weeks told The Associated Press.

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas confirmed the creation of the foundation in a statement and said it has "amicably addressed all matters" with Duncan's family.

The hospital has apologized for releasing Duncan the first time, and after initially denying he had told them he was from West Africa, they acknowledged key caregivers missed his travel history in their record system.

Duncan's sister, Mai Wureh, said that the hospital had satisfied her request for the remainder of her brother's medical records, including lab results of his treatment with the experimental drug brincidofovir.

Wureh also said she and Weeks met Wednesday morning with John Mulligan, the nurse who administered the drug.




View gallery

Josephus Weeks, left, nephew of Thomas Eric Duncan, and Mai Wureh, center, sister of Duncan, look on …
"He gave me closure because he was the last one in that room. He was able to talk to him, comfort him. He held onto him, and that made me feel better. At least he didn't die alone," Wureh told AP.

Louise Troh, Duncan's fiancee, will not receive anything in the settlement, Weisbrod said.

Duncan's family would have faced a very high bar had they filed a lawsuit against Presbyterian hospital. Texas medical malpractice law places a $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages related to pain and suffering in almost all cases.

It also gives extra protection to emergency room doctors and nurses. Instead of just proving that Duncan's doctors were negligent in his care, Duncan's family would have to prove that any negligence was "willful and wanton" — essentially, that doctors knew they were causing harm.

A quick resolution to Duncan's case also benefits parent company Texas Health Resources, which faced weeks of negative publicity over its handling of the case and saw patient visits plummet immediately afterward.


Two Presbyterian nurses were infected during Duncan's care; both have recovered. More than 100 people who had contact with Duncan and the two nurses have been cleared after 21 days of monitoring for Ebola symptoms.

Good for all parties involved, especially for the hospital as their showing of charity will go a long way into filling their pockets in the future, BUT this shyt right here...

I'm 50/50 on this one brehs - but leaning on the side of this being frivilous and advantageous to American's litigious environment.

Do you live in America? Do you know anything about that state dude's family is suing in? Do you have any idea that Texas is one of the biggest tort reform states in the USA?

The fact that his family got something, knowing if it went further that they would lose badly is jaw dropping stuff. Sounds like they didn't have dude sign them right to treat papers, if he did, his family would've lost.

Part of our 'advantageous litigious environment' comes from our lack of accountability in rectifying mistakes when they are found to have hurt people.
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,846
Daps
12,058
Good for all parties involved, especially for the hospital as their showing of charity will go a long way into filling their pockets in the future, BUT this shyt right here...



Do you live in America? Do you know anything about that state dude's family is suing in? Do you have any idea that Texas is one of the biggest tort reform states in the USA?

The fact that his family got something, knowing if it went further that they would lose badly is jaw dropping stuff. Sounds like they didn't have dude sign them right to treat papers, if he did, his family would've lost.

Part of our 'advantageous litigious environment' comes from our lack of accountability in rectifying mistakes when they are found to have hurt people.
Thanks, I'm sure anyone that took Business Law 101 knows that (wrt Texas and tort reform). The bad rap that the hospital got leading up to any deal made was probably more the reason and the fact that they brought forth this lawsuit with the public appeal behind them lends more credence to what I'm saying.

A quick resolution to Duncan's case also benefits parent company Texas Health Resources, which faced weeks of negative publicity over its handling of the case and saw patient visits plummet immediately afterward.
Have the ability to bring this lawsuit up when again there's a bit of blame on both sides , especially the seemingly lack of disclosure on the patients side.
 

Yapdatfool

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
8,894
Reputation
1,366
Daps
23,534
Reppin
NULL
Thanks, I'm sure anyone that took Business Law 101 knows that (wrt Texas and tort reform). The bad rap that the hospital got leading up to any deal made was probably more the reason and the fact that they brought forth this lawsuit with the public appeal behind them lends more credence to what I'm saying.

Well, that happens, but because it was in Texas, the family could've easily lost any case against the hospital if it went any further
Tort reform in the USA works in favour of businesses to win cases against them, not stop them from being filed.

Have the ability to bring this lawsuit up when again there's a bit of blame on both sides, especially the seemingly lack of disclosure on the patients side.

In the article you posted, it states that the hospital has him on record saying he came from west africa though.
I think your confusing the fact that he lied boarding the plane, but told them the facts in the hospital, they screwed up there too:

The hospital has apologized for releasing Duncan the first time, and after initially denying he had told them he was from West Africa, they acknowledged key caregivers missed his travel history in their record system.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
73,288
Reputation
14,847
Daps
309,640
Reppin
Toronto
How the hell does a non-citizen with no insurance get the right to sue for a disease he picked up and didn't disclose that he was vomited on by a woman in Liberia.




http://news.yahoo.com/ebola-victims-family-agreement-hospital-160714403.html


I'm 50/50 on this one brehs - but leaning on the side of this being frivilous and advantageous to American's litigious environment.
Are you aware that they "experimented" on him and gave him a different vaccine from the one that has been saving lives...

I found that odd and insensitive just like how they have yet to get the same proven vaccine on the ground where it is needed.
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
107,011
Reputation
5,539
Daps
212,860
Reppin
NULL
How the hell does a non-citizen with no insurance get the right to sue for a disease he picked up and didn't disclose that he was vomited on by a woman in Liberia.




http://news.yahoo.com/ebola-victims-family-agreement-hospital-160714403.html


I'm 50/50 on this one brehs - but leaning on the side of this being frivilous and advantageous to American's litigious environment.

well the hospital fuked up, he told him hes been around ebola and they still sent home and risked others
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,846
Daps
12,058
Well, that happens, but because it was in Texas, the family could've easily lost any case against the hospital if it went any further
Tort reform in the USA works in favour of businesses to win cases against them, not stop them from being filed.



In the article you posted, it states that the hospital has him on record saying he came from west africa though.
I think your confusing the fact that he lied boarding the plane, but told them the facts in the hospital, they screwed up there too:

Again, anyone with business law 101 knows that. Not sure how being extremely litigious environment in the states has anything to do with what you're saying. You throwing out random factoids and then arguing them up and down. You can sue in the US for basically every and any frivolous thing. That's not my main argument here tho.

this is what I'm saying, he was thrown up on by a vomiting in west africa - he come over to America and apparantly did not disclose those facts. (additionally boarding the plane, which he was to blame for). That's why I'm saying it's 50/50, yeah him being from West AFridca should have raised a flag but additionally - shouldn't he be in there telling them, "listen I don't have a mild cold - i was in Ebola central and a lady threw up on me"! You can't sue for disclosing all the facts

I'm over simplifying this example but lets say their was a strain of HIV that could kill you in 2 days. And you go into a hospital sick and say you just came from ATL, but never reveal the fact that you had unprotected sex while you were there. Later you died...whose fault is that?
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
107,011
Reputation
5,539
Daps
212,860
Reppin
NULL
Again, anyone with business law 101 knows that. Not sure how being extremely litigious environment in the states has anything to do with what you're saying. You throwing out random factoids and then arguing them up and down. You can sue in the US for basically every and any frivolous thing. That's not my main argument here tho.

this is what I'm saying, he was thrown up on by a vomiting in west africa - he come over to America and apparantly did not disclose those facts. (additionally boarding the plane, which he was to blame for). That's why I'm saying it's 50/50, yeah him being from West AFridca should have raised a flag but additionally - shouldn't he be in there telling them, "listen I don't have a mild cold - i was in Ebola central and a lady threw up on me"! You can't sue for disclosing all the facts

I'm over simplifying this example but lets say their was a strain of HIV that could kill you in 2 days. And you go into a hospital sick and say you just came from ATL, but never reveal the fact that you had unprotected sex while you were there. Later you died...whose fault is that?


you also have to take the perspective of the hospital, they just want it to go away and there also possibly facing lawsuits from those nurses who were not properly protected.
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,846
Daps
12,058
Are you aware that they "experimented" on him and gave him a different vaccine from the one that has been saving lives...

I found that odd and insensitive just like how they have yet to get the same proven vaccine on the ground where it is needed.


all Ebola are "experimental" drugs first of all

second - those vaccines weren't available. He got what was available and at the stage he was, they gave him the drug most likely to work for him.
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,846
Daps
12,058
well the hospital fuked up, he told him hes been around ebola and they still sent home and risked others


that's not what happened according to the nurses , who put themselves into risk by handling his bodily fluids.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
73,288
Reputation
14,847
Daps
309,640
Reppin
Toronto
all Ebola are "experimental" drugs first of all

second - those vaccines weren't available. He got what was available and at the stage he was, they gave him the drug most likely to work for him.
Lies... They had the proven drug that has already worked and that is what the nurses got. That is what all the doctors got so far. Dude was given an unproven drug. They might all be experimental but one was proven and already in use so why make him a Guinea pig for one with no human testing?

For the record the one that works is out of Canada and going into production soon for sale and as far as I know it has yet to touch down in Africa so far it has been reserved for returning health workers...
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
107,011
Reputation
5,539
Daps
212,860
Reppin
NULL
that's not what happened according to the nurses , who put themselves into risk by handling his bodily fluids.
all we know is that he told them hes been to west africa and they sent him home.

now thats a fact, they have admitted this
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
107,011
Reputation
5,539
Daps
212,860
Reppin
NULL
Lies... They had the proven vaccine that has already worked and that is what the nurses got. That is what all the doctors got so far. Dude was given an unproven drug. They might all be experimental but one was proven and already in use so why make him a Guinea pig?

there is no proven vaccine, the one that has had good results was experimental and they only had like 3 doses. other experimental drugs have been used and have worked, the problem with duncan is that he was home for those critical 3 days before he went back to the hospital. even without a vaccine if caught early it can be treated.
 
Top