European argues with FD Signifier about the lefts racism against white people

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,067
Reputation
9,329
Daps
103,676



0:00 at the opening the European says hes become more understanding of black peoples race consciousness. He now feels empathy and understand why we feel the need to be defensive. Since he is a victim of anti white racism now.


37:00 the European says DEI is racist. Although he admits the "old boys club" is real. But says that really was old racist white men and not millenials or genz:mjlol:. So they shouldnt be punished for sins of the father.

Then says part of the reason there arent more qualified minorites is because of systematic racism. So why pay people 150k a year in these DEI departments to keep up appearances. Rather than give this money to programs that teach more minorities to excel in certain fields. Him and FD Signifer actually agree on this.


I agree as well slightly,but to agree fully would be giving white people the benefit that they would practice fair hiring practices if there were more qualified black candidates. Hes essentially saying the only issue is the white hiring managers dont have more black candidates to choose from:comeon:


Either way,programs would be more useful if it helps promote black people branching off to create black owned tech startups. Put this investment into HBCUs even. Just like the civil rights movement helped foster a great collective of black lawyers in black colleges, i dont see why the same couldnt happen in HBCUs if black kids got an earlier start and then were forced/incentivised into HBCUS:respect:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,363
Reputation
9,842
Daps
174,990

Study: Black College Students, White High School Graduates Share Same Employment Prospects​


Posted byBy Nick Chiles | Published on: June 26, 2014 | Updated on June 27, 2014 CommentsComments (1)



black construction worker

At a time when African-American young people are far more likely than their white peers to be unemployed, working part-time and earning a lower wage, a new study reveals that Black students need to complete two more levels of education to have the same probability of getting a job as their white peers.

For African-American millennials—those between the ages 18 to 34—the unemployment rate in May was 16.6 percent, compared to a 7.1 percent rate for whites of the same age range. In addition, African-American men in that age range are 30 percent more likely to be working a part-time position than white men of the same age group (approximately 1 in 4 of them are working part-time). In 2012, the median income of African-American millennials was $19,800, compared to $25,000 for whites.

In an effort to discover how to close this employment gap, the researchers from the nonprofit group Young Invincibles used data primarily from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the U.S. Census. The gist of their conclusion is that an African-American male with an associates degree has about the same chance of getting a job as a white male with just a high school diploma.

“At every level of education, race impacts a person’s chance of getting a job,” Tom Allison, a research manager and one of the study’s authors, told ThinkProgress.

As for the reasons for the gap, racism in the hiring process was clearly a huge factor, but the researchers listed a number of other factors: high incarceration rates for Black people, less economic and educational opportunity due to a lack of inherited wealth, lower marriage rates (studies have found many employers discriminate against people who aren’t married during the hiring process), and living in locations that are far away from the jobs.

The Young Invincibles study did have good news: at the higher education levels, the employment difference between Blacks and whites begins to disappear.

For example, the employment gap between black and white men with bachelor’s degrees is only 5 percent. For women, it’s just 3 percent.

But on the down side, African-Americans are much less likely to attain higher education degrees than whites. Blacks are almost twice as likely as whites to drop out of high school and are half as likely to get a post-baccalaureate degree, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau.






A Black Male With A Degree And A White High School Grad Have The Same Chances Of Getting A Job​


A Black Male With A Degree And A White High School Grad Have The Same Chances Of Getting A Job

Jun 27, 2014, 01:55 PM EDT

5badfc421f0000250122d1e6.jpeg


Several studies have pointed out the evident racial achievement gap but recent research has revealed a sad truth -- an African-American male with an associate degree has the same chances of getting a job as a white male with a high school diploma.

The study, conducted by Young Invincibles, looks at the effect of race and education on employment, revealing the impact race can have on an individual's chances of getting a job.

The findings aren't incredibly surprising, considering that black millennials are more than two times more likely to face unemployment than their white counterparts, at 16.6 percent compared to 7.1 percent. But the study delves deeper, exploring hiring discrimination, high black male and female incarceration rates and the gap in generational wealth between whites and African-Americans.

In an interview with Think Progress, Tom Allison, one of the study's authors, pointed out the positive impact additional degrees can have on African-American earning and employment potential.

According to the study, even though unemployment is higher among African Americans at every level of education, the added gains in income and employment opportunities gained from getting an additional degree is much greater for African Americans than whites. For example, a professional degree gives a black male a 146 percent larger increase in employment opportunities than his white counterparts. A bachelor’s degree raises the median wage of a black man by $10,000 per year, compared to a raise of $6,100 per year for a white man.

But despite that fact, African-Americans still face challenges obtaining degrees at all educational levels. Census Bureau data shows that black students are twice as likely to drop out of high school as their white counterparts, and less likely to obtain a college degree.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,363
Reputation
9,842
Daps
174,990

White-sounding names get called back for jobs more than Black ones, a new study finds​


April 11, 2024 5:00 AM ET

By

Joe Hernandez

gettyimages-1487833399_custom-5bdc94b9082fbed5516d42cd47286b4a1ac96ecf.jpg


A sign seeking job applicants is seen in the window of a restaurant in Miami, Florida, on May 5, 2023.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Twenty years ago, two economists responded to a slew of help-wanted ads in Boston and Chicago newspapers using a set of fictitious names to test for racial bias in the job market.

The watershed study found that applicants with names suggesting they were white got 50% more callbacks from employers than those whose names indicated they were Black.

Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Chicago recently took that premise and expanded on it, filing 83,000 fake job applications for 11,000 entry-level positions at a variety of Fortune 500 companies.

Their working paper, published this month and titled "A Discrimination Report Card," found that the typical employer called back the presumably white applicants around 9% more than Black ones. That number rose to roughly 24% for the worst offenders.

The research team initially conducted its experiment in 2021, but their new paper names the 97 companies they included in the study and assigns them grades representing their level of bias, thanks to a new methodology the researchers developed.

"Putting the names out there in the public domain is to move away from a lot of the performative allyship that you see with these companies, saying, 'Oh, we value inclusivity and diversity,'" said Pat Kline, a University of California, Berkeley economics professor who worked on the study. "We're trying to create kind of an objective ground truth here."



From Jobs To Homeownership, Protests Put Spotlight On Racial Economic Divide


America Reckons With Racial Injustice


From Jobs To Homeownership, Protests Put Spotlight On Racial Economic Divide


The names that researchers tested include some used in the 2004 study as well as others culled from a database of speeding tickets in North Carolina. A name was classified as "racially distinctive" if more than 90% of people with that name shared the same race.

Applicants with names such as Brad and Greg were up against Darnell and Lamar. Amanda and Kristen competed for jobs with Ebony and Latoya.

What the researchers found was that some firms called back Black applicants considerably less, while race played little to no factor in the hiring processes at other firms.

Dorianne St Fleur, a career coach and workplace consultant, said she wasn't surprised by the findings showing fewer callbacks for presumed Black applicants at some companies.

"I know the study focused on entry-level positions. Unfortunately it doesn't stop there. I've seen it throughout the organization all the way up into the C-suite," she said.

St Fleur, who primarily coaches women of color, said many of her clients have the right credentials and experience for certain jobs but aren't being hired.

"They are sending out dozens, hundreds of resumes and receiving nothing back," she said.

What the researchers found​


Much of a company's bias in hiring could be explained by its industry, the study found. Auto dealers and retailers of car parts were the least likely to call back Black applicants, with Genuine Auto Parts (which distributes NAPA products) and the used car retailer AutoNation scoring the worst on the study's "discrimination report card."

"We are always evaluating our practices to ensure inclusivity and break down barriers, and we will continue to do so," Heather Ross, vice president of strategic communications at Genuine Parts Company, said in an email.

AutoNation did not reply to a request for comment.

The companies that performed best in the analysis included Charter/Spectrum, Dr. Pepper, Kroger and Avis-Budget.



Workplace Diversity Goes Far Past Hiring. How Leaders Can Support Employees Of Color


Life Kit


Workplace Diversity Goes Far Past Hiring. How Leaders Can Support Employees Of Color


Several patterns emerged when the researchers looked at the companies that had the lowest "contact gap" between white and Black applicants

Federal contractors and more profitable companies called back applicants from the two racial groups at more similar rates. Firms with more centralized human resources departments and policies also exhibited less racial bias, which Kline says may indicate that a standardized hiring workflow involving multiple employees could help reduce discrimination.

When it came to the sex of applicants, most companies didn't discriminate when calling back job-seekers.

Still, some firms preferred one sex over another in screening applicants. Manufacturing companies called back people with male names at higher rates, and clothing stores showing a bias toward female applicants.

What can workplaces — and workers — do​


Kline said the research team hoped the public would focus as much on companies doing a bad job as those doing a good one, since they have potentially found ways to remove or limit racial bias from the hiring process.

"Even if it's true, from these insights in psychology and behavioral economics, that individuals are inevitably going to carry biases along with them, it's not automatic that those individual biases will translate into organizational biases, on average," he said.

St Fleur said there are several strategies companies can use to cut down on bias in the hiring process, including training staff and involving multiple recruiters in callback decisions.

Companies should also collect data about which candidates make it through the hiring process and consider standardizing or anonymizing that process, she added.

St Fleur also said she often tells her job-seeking clients that it's not their fault that they aren't getting called back for open positions they believe they're qualified for.

"The fact that you're not getting callbacks does not mean you suck, you're not a good worker, you don't deserve this thing," she said. "It's just the nature of the systemic forces at play, and this is what we have to deal with."

Still, she said job candidates facing bias in the hiring process can lean on their network for new opportunities, prioritize inclusive companies when applying for work and even consider switching industries or locations.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,363
Reputation
9,842
Daps
174,990



Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews​


African American and Asian job applicants who mask their race on resumes seem to have better success getting job interviews, according to research by Katherine DeCelles and colleagues.

By Dina Gerdeman on May 17, 2017

  1. Harvard Business School


  1. Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews

https%3A%2F%2Fimages.ctfassets.net%2Fbeh2ph2tgbqk%2F011wJWYGWfu8WT6JbTb7mm-asset%2F57fa6868723f8c3580a2ccbc9ef2dae6%2Fwhite-resumes-2800x1296v2.jpg


Minority job applicants are “whitening” their resumes by deleting references to their race with the hope of boosting their shot at jobs, and research shows the strategy is paying off.

In fact, companies are more than twice as likely to call minority applicants for interviews if they submit whitened resumes than candidates who reveal their race—and this discriminatory practice is just as strong for businesses that claim to value diversity as those that don’t.

These research findings should provide a startling wakeup call for business executives: A bias against minorities runs rampant through the resume screening process at companies throughout the United States, says Katherine A. DeCelles, the James M. Collins Visiting Associate Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School.

“Discrimination still exists in the workplace,” DeCelles says. “Organizations now have an opportunity to recognize this issue as a pinch point, so they can do something about it.”

DeCelles co-authored a September 2016 article about the two-year study in Administrative Science Quarterly called Whitened Resumes: Race and Self-Presentation in the Labor Market with Sonia K. Kang, assistant professor of organizational behavior and human resource management at the University of Toronto Mississauga; András Tilcsik, assistant professor of strategic management at the University of Toronto; and Sora Jun, a doctoral candidate at Stanford University.

Discrimination still exists in the workplace. Organizations now have an opportunity to recognize this issue as a pinch point, so they can do something about it.

In one study, the researchers created resumes for black and Asian applicants and sent them out for 1,600 entry-level jobs posted on job search websites in 16 metropolitan sections of the United States. Some of the resumes included information that clearly pointed out the applicants’ minority status, while others were whitened, or scrubbed of racial clues. The researchers then created email accounts and phone numbers for the applicants and observed how many were invited for interviews.



'Whitened' resumes produce more job call-backs for African Americans​


https%3A%2F%2Fimages.ctfassets.net%2Fbeh2ph2tgbqk%2F1nxL2LooamONPOflj2KXeu%2Fed37bf1362be6313b1a9919195f46a48%2Fwhitened-resumes.png


Blacks get more job interview callbacks when they “whiten” their resumes. Graphic by Blair Storie-Johnson (Source: “Whitened Resumes: Race and Self-Presentation in the Labor Market”)

Employer callbacks for resumes that were whitened fared much better in the application pile than those that included ethnic information, even though the qualifications listed were identical. Twenty-five percent of black candidates received callbacks from their whitened resumes, while only 10 percent got calls when they left ethnic details intact. Among Asians, 21 percent got calls if they used whitened resumes, whereas only 11.5 percent heard back if they sent resumes with racial references.



‘Pro-diversity’ employers discriminate, too​


What’s worse for minority applicants: When an employer says it values diversity in its job posting by including words like “equal opportunity employer” or “minorities are strongly encouraged to apply,” many minority applicants get the false impression that it’s safe to reveal their race on their resumes—only to be rejected later.

In one study to test whether minorities whiten less often when they apply for jobs with employers that seem diversity-friendly, the researchers asked some participants to craft resumes for jobs that included pro-diversity statements and others to write resumes for jobs that didn’t mention diversity.

They found minorities were half as likely to whiten their resumes when applying for jobs with employers who said they care about diversity. One black student explained in an interview that with each resume she sent out, she weighed whether to include her involvement in a black student organization: “If the employer is known for like trying to employ more people of color and having like a diversity outreach program, then I would include it because in that sense they’re trying to broaden their employees, but if they’re not actively trying to reach out to other people of other races, then no, I wouldn’t include it.”

But these applicants who let their guard down about their race ended up inadvertently hurting their chances of being considered: Employers claiming to be pro-diversity discriminated against resumes with racial references just as much as employers who didn’t mention diversity at all in their job ads.

“This is a major point of our research—that you are at an even greater risk for discrimination when applying with a pro-diversity employer because you’re being more transparent,” DeCelles says. “Those companies have the same rate of discrimination, which makes you more vulnerable when you expose yourself to those companies.”

DeCelles sees an obvious disconnect between the companies’ pro-diversity messages and the actual acceptance of diverse applicants, yet she doesn’t believe employers are using these messages as a way to trap and weed out minorities that do apply.

“I don’t think it’s intended to be a setup,” she says. “These organizations are not necessarily all talk when they say they’re pro-diversity. Maybe the diversity values are there, but they just haven’t been translated from the person who writes the job ad to the person who is screening resumes.”

But clearly the findings reinforce an assumption many minorities already have: that the resume screening game is stacked against them and that they need to hide their race to level the playing field.

The researchers interviewed 59 Asian and African American students between the ages of 18 and 25 who were seeking jobs and internships. More than a third, 36 percent, said they whiten their resumes, and two-thirds knew friends or family members who had done so, all because they were afraid their resumes could be unfairly tossed aside if their race became obvious.

“The primary concern is that were trying to avoid a negative group-based stereotype that they felt could occur in a quick scan of a resume,” DeCelles says. “They whitened their resumes because they wanted to appear more mainstream.”



Different minority groups use different whitening techniques​


Asian applicants often changed foreign-sounding names to something American-sounding—like substituting “Luke” for “Lei”—and they also “Americanized” their interests by adding outdoorsy activities like hiking, snowboarding, and kayaking that are common in white western culture.

One Asian applicant said she put her “very Chinese-sounding” name on her resume in her freshman year, but only got noticed after subbing in her American nickname later: “Before I changed it, I didn’t really get any interviews, but after that I got interviews,” she said.

Some Asians covered up their race because they worried employers might be concerned about a possible language barrier. “You can’t prove your English is good in a resume scan, but you can if you can get to the interview,” DeCelles says.

Meanwhile, African Americans toned down mentions of race from black organizations they belonged to, such as dropping the word “black” from a membership in a professional society for black engineers. Others omitted impressive achievements altogether, including one black college senior who nixed a prestigious scholarship from his resume because he feared it would reveal his race.

“Some applicants were willing to lose what could be seen as valuable pieces of human capital because they were more worried about giving away their race,” DeCelles says.

Some black students bleached out this information because they were concerned they might come across as politically radical or tied to racially controversial causes in a way that could turn off an employer.

“People … want to have like an awesome black worker but they want one who they feel like fits within a certain box and like very much will conform and like lay low and just kind of do what’s expected of them, and they’re not necessarily looking for the outspoken like political radical person,” a black college senior said. “I feel like race is just one of the many aspects where you try to just like buff the surface smooth … and pretend like there’s nothing sticking out.”

I wouldn’t consider whitening my resume because if they don’t accept my racial identity, I don’t see how I would fit in that job

Other interviewed students were staunchly opposed to resume whitening. Some even said they purposely left in racial references as a way of sniffing out employers that might not welcome minorities. One student said, “If blackness put a shadow over all (my resume), then it probably isn’t the job I want to be in,” while another said, “I wouldn’t consider whitening my resume because if they don’t accept my racial identity, I don’t see how I would fit in that job.”



How to address discriminatory hiring practices​


It’s time for employers to acknowledge that bias is hardwired into the hiring system and that prejudice is clouding the screening of qualified applicants, says DeCelles, whose research focuses on the intersection of organizational behavior and criminology.

Business leaders should start by taking a closer look at their resume screening processes. Blind recruitment is one possible solution, where information about race, age, gender, or social class are removed from resumes before hiring managers see them.

Companies can also perform regular checks for discrimination in the screening process, for example by measuring how many minorities applied for a position and comparing that with the percentage of those applicants who made the first cut.

“Organizations can now see very clearly that this is why they are not meeting their diversity goals,” DeCelles says. “They can’t just put a message on recruitment ads and be done. They need to follow through with a clear structure and staff training. They need to make goals and then continually evaluate the outcome in order to meet those goals.”

The bottom line for business leaders who are hiring, she says: “Once you receive applications, you need to make sure they are evaluated fairly.”
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,363
Reputation
9,842
Daps
174,990

Employers Discriminate Against Job Candidates With Black-Sounding Names, Study Suggests​


Written by Martin Abel, Bowdoin College

Published on September 22, 2023

job discrimination against Black people names
What role will race play in determining who gets the job?

Cecilie_Arcurs/E+ via Getty Image

Because names are among the first things you learn about someone, they can influence first impressions.

That this is particularly true for names associated with Black people came to light in 2004 with the release of a study that found employers seeing identical resumes were 50% more likely to call back an applicant with stereotypical white names like Emily or Greg versus applicants with names like Jamal or Lakisha.

I’m a behavioral economist who researches discrimination in labor markets. In a study based on a hiring experiment I conducted with another economist, Rulof Burger, we found that participants systematically discriminated against job candidates with names they associated with Black people, especially when put under time pressure. We also found that white people who oppose affirmative action discriminated more than other people against job candidates with distinctly Black names, whether or not they had to make rushed decisions.

Detecting racial biases​


To conduct this study, we recruited 1,500 people from all 50 U.S. states in 2022 to participate in an online experiment on Prolific, a survey platform. The group was nationally representative in terms of race and ethnicity, age and gender.

We first collected data on their beliefs about the race and ethnicity, education, productivity and personality traits of people with six names picked from a pool of 2,400 workers whom we hired in an early stage of our experiment for a transcription task. Data from these individual responses made it possible for us to categorize how they perceived the candidates.

We found that the names of workers perceived as Black, such as Shanice or Terell, were more likely to elicit negative presumptions, such as being less educated, productive, trustworthy and reliable, than people with either white-sounding names, such as Melanie or Adam, or racially ambiguous names, such as Krystal or Jackson.

We were specifically studying discrimination against Black people, so we did not include names in this experiment that are frequently associated with Hispanics or Asians.

Participants were next presented with pairs of names and were told they could earn money for selecting the worker who was more productive in the transcription task. The chance that they would choose job candidates they perceived to be white because of their names was almost twice as high than if they thought the candidates to be Black. This tendency to discriminate against people with Black-sounding names was greatest among men, people over 55, whites and conservatives.

Educational attainment, the level of racial diversity in the participants’ ZIP codes or whether they had personally hired anyone before didn’t influence their apparent biases.

Rushing can cause more discriminatory behavior​


Most real-world hiring managers spend less than 10 seconds reviewing each resume during the initial screening stage. To keep up that swift pace, they may resort to using mental shortcuts – including racial stereotypes – to assess job applications.

We found that requiring the study participants to select a worker within only 2 seconds led them to be 25% more likely to discriminate against candidates with names they perceived as Black-sounding. Similar patterns of biased decision-making under time pressure have been documented in the context of police shootings and medical decisions.

However, making decisions more slowly is not a panacea.

We found that the most important factor for whether more deliberate decisions reduce discrimination was a participant’s view on affirmative action – the consideration of race in a workforce or student body to ensure that their share of people of color is roughly proportionate to the general public or a local community.

White participants who opposed affirmative action were more than twice as likely to select an applicant with a white-sounding name compared with applicants perceived as Black – whether or not they had to make the simulated hiring decision in a hurry.

By contrast, giving white participants who favor affirmative action unlimited time to choose a name from the hiring list reduced discrimination against the job candidates with names they perceived as Black-sounding by almost half. The data showed that this decline had to do with people basing their decision more on their perceptions of a worker’s performance, rather than relying on mental shortcuts based on their perceived race.

We assessed the participants’ views on affirmative action by doing a survey at the end of this experiment.

Discrimination hasn’t gone away​


A study published in 2021 suggested that hiring discrimination based on Black-sounding names had declined, although discriminatory practices remained high in some customer-facing lines of work, such as auto sales or retail.

Other research has suggested that once people learn more about someone, the discriminatory influence that a name might have begins to fade. Yet, other studies have indicated that racial biases can make the interactions needed for this learning process less likely. For example, racial biases may lead employers to refrain from interviewing – or hiring – a job candidate of color in the first place.

There is ample evidence that people of color face discrimination in many important domains beyond employment, including finding housing or obtaining loans.

Our results suggest that slowing down the initial assessment of applicants can be a first step toward reducing this type of discrimination.

Martin Abel, Assistant Professor of Economics, Bowdoin College

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,363
Reputation
9,842
Daps
174,990



A Black jobseeker said he used a white-sounding name on his résumé and got a job interview. Now he's suing.​


Dwight Jackson said he applied for a job at a Detroit hotel as "John Jebrowski" and was quickly asked to interview for a position.

July 11, 2024, 4:41 PM EDT

By Isabel Yip

A Black man has filed a discrimination lawsuit against a boutique hotel in Detroit after he said his multiple job applications went ignored — until he changed the name on his résumé to a white-sounding name.

Dwight Jackson said that he applied repeatedly for positions at the Shinola Hotel under his given name between January 2024 and April 2024, according to a legal complaint filed on July 3 in the Third Judicial Circuit of Michigan. When he changed the name on his otherwise identical résumé to “John Jebrowski,” according to the suit, Jackson said he was called in for an interview that same week.

According to Jackson’s attorney, Jonathan Marko, Jackson’s work experience includes reception jobs at comparable hotels like the Westin Book Cadillac Detroit.

“It made him question, ‘How many other jobs along the way have I not been given an opportunity for because of the color of my skin,’ and he’s questioning himself, he’s questioning his self worth,” Marko said to NBC News.

An exterior view of Shinola Hotel in Detroit.
The Shinola Hotel in Detroit.Google Maps

When Jackson later applied twice for similar front desk positions at the hotel, according to the lawsuit, and was contacted for an interview under “a more readily apparent Caucasian name,” John Jebrowski, he concluded that the hotel’s “consideration of candidates was based on the racial appearance of the applicant’s name,” according to the lawsuit. The complaint alleges the Shinola Hotel violated the Michigan Elliott Larsen Civil Rights Act on the basis of disparate treatment and retaliation. The policy, established in 1977, secured opportunities to obtain employment, housing, public services and education without discrimination.

Hotels Magazine recently called the Shinola Hotel “a centerpiece of the Detroit revival.” Sage Hospitality Group, the operating partner of the Shinola Hotel, said in a statement to NBC News that the company does not tolerate discrimination of any kind.

“The preliminary findings of our internal investigation relating to this claim have revealed significant inconsistencies with the plaintiff’s allegations,” the company said in a statement. “It is unfortunate that the plaintiff’s counsel has chosen to take these unsubstantiated claims to the media before proper due diligence has been completed.”

Marko, Jackson’s attorney, said his client revealed his true identity at the interview, confronting the interviewer by saying that he believed he was not given an interview as “Dwight Jackson” due to name discrimination.

“Shortly after Jackson underwent the interview process, he was informed that he was no longer a viable candidate for the position,” the lawsuit states.

“Upon information and belief, Jackson’s applications were disregarded by Defendant due to discrimination of his race,” the complaint reads. The complaint says that Jackson is seeking damages for stress, humiliation, economic and emotional damages.

Marko also said that his client’s primary goal is to raise awareness about name discrimination and prevent it from happening to others. “He definitely doesn’t want it to happen at Shinola, he doesn’t want it to happen in his hometown of Detroit. But if he can make a difference to just other people across the United States, that’s what he wants to do,” Marko said.

Studies have pointed to the prevalence of name-based discrimination by companies in the résumé reviewing process. In April of this year, the National Bureau of Economic Research issued “A Discrimination Report Card” of nearly 100 U.S. companies. By sending fake resumes with equal qualifications and different names, researchers found that employers contacted presumed white candidates 9.5% more than presumed Black candidates.
 
Top