Fact-Checking the Foreign-Policy Debate

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
93,501
Reputation
3,905
Daps
166,835
Reppin
Brooklyn
Fact-Checking the Foreign-Policy Debate
By Joshua Keating

488694758-republican-presidential-candidate-donald-trump-looks-on.jpg.CROP.promo-xlarge2.jpg

Donald Trump looks on as Ben Carson speaks during the debates at the Reagan Library on September 16, 2015 in Simi Valley, California.

Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

On Wednesday night, we walked through some of the faulty, misleading, or just plainuntrue claims made by GOP candidates about Iran in the CNN primary debate. But there were a lot of other foreign policy statements by Republican candidates during Wednesday’s debates and a whole lot more things that they got just plain wrong. Here is a brief list of the many wrong things we were able to spot.

JOSHUA KEATING
Joshua Keating is a staff writer at Slate focusing on international affairs.

Donald Trump
What he said: “Mexico and almost every other country anywhere in the world doesn't have [birthright citizenship]. We're the only ones dumb enough, stupid enough to have it.”

What he got wrong: About 33 countries, including nearly every single one in the Western Hemisphere, grant at least some form of birthright citizenship according to Numbers USA, a group that favors reduced immigration to the U.S. The Mexican constitution grants nationality to anyone born on Mexican territory, regardless of the nationality of his or her parents. Mexican law distinguishes between nationality and citizenship, and technically you’re not a “citizen” until you turn 18. But, in practice, the policies of the two countries are nearly identical.

What he said: “Think of this: we're fighting ISIS. ISIS wants to fight Syria. Why are we fighting ISIS in Syria? Let them fight each other and [let’s] pick up the remnants.”

What he got wrong: Not shockingly, it’s a little more complicated than that. First of all, the U.S. government has alleged that the Syrian regime has aided ISIS, or at the very least has focused its attention primarily on western-backed rebel groups, allowing the Islamic State to spread, putting additional pressure on his opponents. ISIS also isn’t just fighting in Syria. Its fighting U.S. backed forces in Iraq and its affiliates have carried out attacks in Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Yemen and elsewhere. Undoubtedly, it’s hard to pick out clear-cut good guys in the conflict, but the various sides of the war have been fighting each other for five years and the result has been the worst humanitarian catastrophe of this century without achieving Trump’s purported aim.

Carly Fiorina
What she said: (On the subject of Obama’s foreign policy failures) “We could also, to Senator Rubio's point, give the Egyptians what they've asked for, which is intelligence. We could give the Jordanians what they've asked for, bombs and materiel. We have not supplied it. We could arm the Kurds. They've been asking us for three years.”

What She Got Wrong: Fiorina has used versions of this message before and its worth going through line by line. The U.S. had frozen military aid to Egypt—the second largest recipient of such aid after Israel—a few months after the overthrow of President Mohamed Morsi, but resumed it in March. Even during the freeze, the head of Egypt’s intelligence agency told the Washington Post’s David Ignatius that there had been “no change” in his friendly relationship with U.S. spy agencies.

On Jordan, the Obama administration agreed last year to increase annual economic and military aid from $660 million to $1 billion over the next three years. It was reported in February that the U.S. was expediting plans to supply Jordan with munitions including precision-guided arms following an appeal from King Abdullah. It is true, though, that Jordan has been denied licenses to buy certain systems, such as armed drones.

As for the Kurds, critics of this policy usually qualify it, as Fiorina didn’t, by saying the U.S. hasn’t “directly” supplied them arms. The U.S. has sent weapons to Kurdish forces, but the Kurdish Regional Government is not a sovereign state. That means that under U.S. law, all weapons systems have to go through Baghdad. The Kurds say this effectively gives the central government, which is hostile toward Kurdish aspirations for independence, has led to delays and shortages of much needed arms. Secretary of State John Kerry has invited congress to change that law, but an amendment to do so failed in the Senate in June.

John Kasich
What he said: “We have a Holocaust memorial on our state house grounds. And there is one line on there that stands out all the time. ‘If you've saved one life, you've changed the world.’”

What he got wrong: It may stand out all the time but Kasich doesn’t remember it correctly. The quote from the Talmud, also featured in a memorable scene in the movie Schindler’s List, is translated on the Ohio statehouse’s memorial as “If you save one life, it is as if you saved the world.” Not too far off, but the meaning is not quite the same and the misquote is a little odd given the emphasis he placed on the line in his closing statement.

Marco Rubio
What he said: (On his vote against authorizing military force against Syria in 2013.) “Let's remember what the president said. He said the attack he would conduct would be a pinprick. Well, the United States military was not build to conduct pinprick attacks.”

What he got wrong: Actually, Obama said the exact opposite of that. In a televised address on Sept. 10, 2013 he said, “Let me make something clear: The United States military doesn’t do pinpricks.” (In fairness to Rubio, it’s true that he was proposing a limited air operation in response to Syria’s use of chemical weapons, one that Kerry said would be “unbelievably small.”) But, whether Obama or Rubio says it, the pinprick argument doesn’t make much sense. From Ronald Reagan’s one-day airstrikes against Muammar al-Qaddafi’s regime in Libya in 1986 to the Seal Team Six raid on Osama Bin Laden’s compound, the U.S. military has plenty of experience carrying out limited, small-scale operations.

What he said: (On climate change.) “America is not a planet. And we are not even the largest carbon producer anymore, China is. And they're drilling a hole and digging anywhere in the world that they can get a hold of.”

What he got wrong: It’s true that China is now the world’s largest carbon emitter—though the U.S. is much higher per capita—but China has already started reducing the amount of coal it burns, which experts say is a major reason why global emissions growth stalled last year .

Ben Carson
What he said: (On how he would have responded to 9/11 instead of invading Afghanistan.) “Declare that within five to 10 years we will become petroleum independent. The moderate Arab states would have been so concerned about that, they would have turned over Osama bin Laden and anybody else you wanted on a silver platter within two weeks.”

What he got wrong: This makes no sense at all. Al-Qaida, since its inception, has been dedicated to the destruction of “moderate” U.S.-backed Arab governments. Bin Laden was hiding in Afghanistan and then Pakistan, neither of which are Arab countries and neither of which are significant oil exporters.

In other stuff the Republicans got wrong in Wednesday’s debates: Rick Santorum said that Supreme Court doesn’t get to interpret laws; Mike Huckabee incorrectly said the Ft. Hood got a religious accommodation to shave his beard; Carly Fiorina seemed to invent a grisly and inaccurate description of the Planned Parenthood sting videos; Marco Rubio got nearly everything wrong about climate change; Chris Christie cited a faulty report to claim that social security was going insolvent very soon; Carly Fiorina wrongly said that most inmates are locked up for non-violent drug crimes; Donald Trump said some horrible things about vaccinations; and finally, Jeb Bush seemed to forget that 9/11 was not an example of the America being kept safe.

The GOP Candidates Said So Many Wrong Things About Foreign Policy in the CNN Debate

:sconi:
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,666
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,541
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
All I cared about was getting them to talk a lot so we could have great fact checking articles.

Of course all CNN cares about is "who won." How can you win a debate for Presidential nominee if you're wrong and purposefully misleading? How is that allowed?
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,666
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,541
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Summary
The Republican presidential candidates met for their second debate on Sept. 16, this one hosted by CNN at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum in California. We found they strayed from the facts on numerous issues, including:

  • Donald Trump told a story linking vaccination to autism, but there’s no evidence that recommended vaccines cause autism. And Sen. Rand Paul suggested that it would be safer to spread out recommended vaccines, but there’s no evidence of that, either.
  • Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said Trump donated to his gubernatorial campaign to get him to change his mind on casino gambling in Florida. But Trump denied he ever wanted to bring casino gambling to the state. A former lobbyist says he did.
  • Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee said that Hillary Clinton was “under investigation by the FBI” because she “destroyed government records.” Not true. She had the authority to delete personal emails.
  • Trump said that “illegal immigration” cost “more than $200 billion a year.” We couldn’t find any support for that. Actually, it could cost taxpayers $137 billion or more to deport the 11 million immigrants in the country illegally, as Trump proposes.
  • Trump again wrongly said that Mexico doesn’t have a birthright citizenship policy like the United States. It does.
  • Carly Fiorina said that the Planned Parenthood videos released by an anti-abortion group showed “a fully formed fetus on the table, its heart beating, its legs kicking while someone says we have to keep it alive to harvest its brain.” But that scene isn’t in any of the videos.
  • Fiorina repeated familiar boasts about her time at Hewlett-Packard, saying the size of the company “doubled,” without mentioning that was due to a merger with Compaq, and she cherry-picked other statistics.
  • Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said that U.S. policies to combat climate change would “do absolutely nothing.” The U.S. acting alone would have a small effect on rising temperatures and sea levels, and experts say U.S. leadership on the issue would prompt other nations to act.
  • In the “happy hour” debate, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham glossed over the accompanying tax increases when he said only that Ronald Reagan and then-House Speaker Tip O’Neill “found a way to save Social Security from bankruptcy by adjusting the age of retirement from 65 to 67.”
FactChecking the CNN Republican Debate
 

ADevilYouKhow

Rhyme Reason
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
38,611
Reputation
1,458
Daps
64,983
Reppin
got a call for three nines
All I cared about was getting them to talk a lot so we could have great fact checking articles.

Of course all CNN cares about is "who won." How can you win a debate for Presidential nominee if you're wrong and purposefully misleading? How is that allowed?

Exactly. these are people who could be president and they know nothing about anything. It's disheartening to not see intelligence valued in our society. I also couldn't believe the frankness of the post debate where the hosts brought up BLM and their thought however honest was to not bother asking because the panelists wouldn't differ on the subject.

:mindblown:

They hosts really didn't challenge them at all but maybe that was pre agreed...
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,578
Reputation
325
Daps
6,627
All I cared about was getting them to talk a lot so we could have great fact checking articles.

Of course all CNN cares about is "who won." How can you win a debate for Presidential nominee if you're wrong and purposefully misleading? How is that allowed?

lol, as if voters make decisions based on which candidate is the most honest. We live in an era where soundbites are more important than substance.
 

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,044
Reputation
-11,650
Daps
155,711
Reppin
Inches
Fact checkers will have a field day with Fiorina
Her answer on Russia, for instance, was bizarre.

The Sixth Fleet is already huge, and it's hard to say why adding to its capabilities would intimidate Putin — after all, America has enough nuclear weapons pointed at Russia to level the country thousands of times over. Her proposal for more military exercises in the Baltics seemed odd in light of the fact that President Obama is already conducting military exercises in the Baltics. And the US already has around 40,000 troops stationed in Germany, so it's hard to say what good "a few thousand" more would do. And pushing on a missile defense system in Poland is a very long-term solution to a very current problem. In total, Fiorina's laundry list of proposals sure sounded like a plan, but on inspection, it's hard to see why any of them would convince Putin to change course.

Her immigration answer was also odd to anyone who knew the issue's recent history. It's true Obama didn't immediately push immigration reform when he took office, but it was his top priority after reelection, and he spent a solid year trying to make the Senate's comprehensive immigration-reform bill — the one crafted, in part, by Sen. Marco Rubio— into law. That legislation was stopped by Republicans in the House of Representatives, not by the Democrat in the White House. "Send me a comprehensive immigration reform bill in the next few months," Obama begged in 2013, "and I will sign it right away."

Or take her biggest applause line of the night: a riff on the Planned Parenthood tapes that set conservative Twitter afire. "I dare Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama to watch these tapes. Watch a fully formed fetus on the table, it's heart beating, it's legs kicking while someone says we have to keep it alive to harvest its brain."

The only problem? Nothing like that happens in the Planned Parenthood tapes. As Sarah Kliff, who has watched all the tapes, wrote, "either Fiorina hasn't watched the Planned Parenthood videos or she is knowingly misrepresenting the footage."

This has become something of a habit for Fiorina, who has a notable facility for delivering answers that thrill conservatives but fall apart under close examination. In a recent interview with Katie Couric, for instance, Fiorina delivered a four-minute riff on climate change that the National Review enthused "shows how to address the left on climate change." The only problem, as David Roberts pointed out, was that every single thing she said in it was wrong.

But if presidential campaigns were decided by fact checkers, Al Gore would have won in a landslide. Fiorina is, for now, able to do what her competitors aren't: command a stage, speak in specifics, project knowledge, and elicit roars from a crowd. She's a political outsider in a campaign that favors outsiders, an orthodox conservative at a moment when Republicans are terrified of Donald Trump's heterodoxies, and a woman in a year when most Republicans think Hillary Clinton's main advantage is her gender. And she's now won two debates against the most talented Republican field in a generation.

Fiorina is going to be a force to be reckoned with, even if it's going to leave fact checkers and policy analysts pulling their hair out.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,666
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,541
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
lol, as if voters make decisions based on which candidate is the most honest. We live in an era where soundbites are more important than substance.

It's always been this way, so we can't even say "in this era." That's what makes this so frustrating.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,666
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,541
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Did you all even read the article? Like 75% of it was mere nit-picking at a missed word or two there.

This is really below the Slate's standards :snoop:

Trump lying about the US being the only country with birth right citizenship is nit picking? Even though this is a crucial aspect of his anti-immigration policy?

Carly misleading the public about our relationship with egypt, jordan and the kurds is nit picking? Even though she's using these examples as a way to illustrate that Obama is an ineffective leader who is hurting our allies in the region?

Rubio stating that Obama called the militaries efffort a pinprick, when he said the exact opposite is nitpicking? Even though Rubio is using this as an example to show that Obama does not understand his militaries capabilities and thus being able to tie this to why the war in Syria and the war with ISIS has gotten out of control?

Rubio stating that "America is not a planet" and lying about China's climate change policies is nitpicking? Even though he spent 2 minutes lying about the ineffectiveness of our carbon emissions based on the idea that China is gonna China?

It's like you can't connect the dots or you're just purposely being ignorant about the debate.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
93,501
Reputation
3,905
Daps
166,835
Reppin
Brooklyn
Did you all even read the article? Like 75% of it was mere nit-picking at a missed word or two there.

This is really below the Slate's standards :snoop:

Nah, they were purposefully misleading the public and using scare tactics.
 
Top