"FDA Pushing To Regulate Homeopathy Out of Existence"

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,343
Daps
115,994
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
I'll use two different types of sources to explain the story. :sas2:


http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/fda-pushing-regulate-homeopathy-out-existence1

FDA Pushing To Regulate Homeopathy Out of Existence

Posted on:
Monday, March 30th 2015 at 1:30 pm
Written By:
Dr. Martha Grout, MD, MD(H)
FDA-Homeopathic-medicine.jpg


Why is there a sudden push by the FDA to label homeopathic remedies as dangerous? Why is there a need to regulate substances that have been used for hundreds of years with out any issues? What does the FDA have to gain?

The FDA has published two documents recently, which suggest that WAR is being declared on the profession of homeopathic medicine – or at least on the manufacture of homeopathic remedies, which comes to the same thing in the end. What is a homeopath without homeopathic remedies?

On March 19, 2015 the FDA published an advisory (called a "safety alert") about homeopathic asthma OTC medications, recommending that patients be wary, and that health care practitioners be sure to report any adverse effects to the FDA. Here is the link to that safety alert: http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/...tyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm439014.htm

The FDA has since that date scheduled public hearings on

"the current use of human drug and biological products labeled as homeopathic, as well as the Agency's regulatory framework for such products. These products include prescription drugs and biological products labeled as homeopathic and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs labeled as homeopathic."

Here is the link to the document which was published on March 27, 2015 – not even 10 days after the March 19th safety alert. https://www.federalregister.gov/art...and-drug-administrations-regulatory-framework

The date of the hearings is set for April 20 and 21, 2015, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. That is three weeks from first publication of the announcement.

What's the rush? Homeopathic remedies have been in use since they were first introduced to the United States in 1925 by Dr. Hans Burch Gram. Textbooks by the founder of Homeopathy, Samuel Hahnemann, were available, but only in German until 1835. The practice of homeopathy spread throughout the USA because doctors found it to be so much more effective in their complex and unresolved medical cases. Homeopathic medicines have been accepted in the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States (HPUS) and regulated under a document called CPG Sec. 400.400, Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed. These conditions have been unchanged for the last 40 years.

Why, suddenly now, are we wanting to change the manufacture of these remedies? Why such a push to label homeopathic remedies dangerous, when they have been around for over 200 years without any problems?

clip_image004.png
Cui bono? The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines this phrase: "a principle that probable responsibility for an act or event lies with one having something to gain". Who stands to gain from destroying the manufacturers of homeopathic remedies?

A sentence in the most recent version of the 400.400 document with regards to FDA regulation of homeopathic medicine may provide a clue.

"Until recently, homeopathic drugs have been marketed on a limited scale by a few manufacturers who have been in business for many years and have predominantly served the needs of a limited number of licensed practitioners... Today the homeopathic drug market has grown to become a multimillion dollar industry in the United States, with a significant increase shown in the importation and domestic marketing of homeopathic drug products."
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,343
Daps
115,994
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkroll/2015/04/01/fda-to-hold-public-hearing-on-homeopathy-products/

4/01/2015 @ 10:16AM 569 views
FDA To Hold Public Hearing On Homeopathy Products

Comment Now
a public hearing will be held on April 20 and 21 to collect information and comments from stakeholders on homeopathic products sold as prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medicines. The agency’s White Oak campus in Silver Spring, Maryland, will host the meeting.

In details posted last Friday in the Federal Register, the agency stated that it is, “evaluating its current enforcement policies for drug products labeled as homeopathic from scientific, risk, and process perspectives. The Agency is now soliciting opinions about whether and how to adjust the current enforcement policies to reflect changes in the homeopathic product marketplace over the last approximately 25 years.” (PDF here.)

How did we get here?

One could be forgiven for thinking that homeopathic drugs are an April Fools’ joke. The remedies trace back to German physician, Samuel Hahnemann, who was devising an alternative to the harsh practices of medicine in the late 1700s and early 1800s such as bloodletting and poisoning. He proposed that substances capable of causing disease symptoms when taken by healthy volunteers at high doses could be used to treat sick patients with diseases that match those symptoms, but only when given in dilute doses. In fact, homeopaths claim that a substance becomes more potent the more it becomes diluted by intense shaking, a process they call succussion.

640x0.jpg

Medical bottles containing homeopathic pills stand in the European Homeopathy Library in Koethen, eastern Germany, Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2009. (AP Photo/Eckehard Schulz)

The idea of Similia Similibus Curentur, or “like cures like,” seemed attractive in those times. But in most cases, those dilutions are so extensive that no molecules of the original chemical remains in the remedy that is sold. Hahnemann’s remedies were mostly 30C in homeopathy parlance: one to 100 dilutions of a substance made 30 times. That’s a dilution of 10 to the 60th power, or 1 followed by 60 zeros.

As an aside, today’s experimental pharmacologists consider Hahnemann’s work to be a misinterpretation of that of Austrian physician, Anton von Störk. A contemporary of Hahnemann, von Störk held that the substances in poisonous plants could be used to treat diseases when diluted below poisonous levels, but those levels still contained the plant chemical.

Perhaps the most striking characteristic of the history of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is the fact that this measure, which was of consequence to the health and pocketbook of every citizen of the country and which importantly affected industries whose annual product totals roughly ten billion dollars, never became the object of widespread public attention, much less of informed public interest. The affected industries were kept posted by their associations and their journals; some national women’s organizations sought to apprise their membership of major developments; but the public at large, including persons ordinarily well-informed on national affairs, knew little or nothing of what was transpiring in Congress. I suspect that today only a small fraction of the public knows that a new law has been enacted.

Why the hearing and why now?

Fast forward to today, homeopathic products are still sold side-by-side with real, active medicines in pharmacies and other retail stores. The FDA now appears to be interested in addressing some issues that were tabled in 1972 to review homeopathics for safety and efficacy and in 1988 under a section on homeopathic products in the agency’s Compliance Policy Guide regarding health fraud.

The FDA states that homeopathic remedies had traditionally only been offered by a limited number of manufacturers for use by the relatively small group of homeopathic practitioners. The products were not intended to be widely marketed directed to the public in an industry that now counts annual sales of nearly $3 billion.

Moreover, many of today’s homeopathic remedies actually do contain conventional amounts of medicines. For example, Zicam spray and Cold-EEZE lozenges are sold as homeopathic products but contain enough zinc to be tasted (as astringent) or cause side effects. These products can confuse consumers because they make disease treatment claims but then carry, in very small print, the disclaimer that, “These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.”

I’ve always held that it’s an ethical violation for any health-related company to sell homeopathic remedies regardless of the allowances of a 77-year-old law, especially when offered alongside real medicines. In Canada, a similar argument was made yesterday by André Picard in The Globe and Mail, particularly since a new act recognizing the practice of homeopathy takes effect today in Ontario. And Canadian pharmacist, Scott Gavura, PharmD, has written of his objection to Target pharmacies selling the Up & Up store brand of homeopathic inhalers for asthma.

Last September, shortly after CVS Health announced that tobacco products would no longer be sold in stores, I asked Troy Brennan, MD, CVS executive vice president and chief medical officer if unproven dietary supplements and homeopathics would be the next products taken off the shelves. Brennan said, “Since we’ve taken on the name CVS Health, we have to re-scrutinize everything that we’re selling in some parts of the stores. Over time, we’ll decide if we need to be making changes in what the offerings are.”

So, we’re in an age when states such as New York are acting against herbal medicine companies for selling remedies that allegedly have no active components. It follows, then, that action should be taken against products that are supposed to have nothing in them that do, as well as products that really do contain nothing. The agency, for their part, is very objective in their wording, saying that the goal is to hear discussion on, “the current enforcement policies related to drug products labeled as homeopathic in an effort to better promote and protect the public health.”

Seating at the hearing will be on a first-come, first-serve basis. Parties interested in making a presentation must submit a formal request and provide the content of their presentation by April 13. FDA encourages any interested parties send in written comments before April 16. Extensive details are available in the Federal Register and in condensed form at the FDA website. The agency also notes that the April 20-21 hearing can be viewed off-site via webcast.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-256
Daps
65,133
Reppin
NULL
Look at those who support the pushing out of this....the same clowns who support BigPharma. How many deaths of people from BigPharma drugs again? Oh that's right @88m3 @Melbournelad @Napolean don't look at the numbers because deaths aren't important. What is important is that there is no competition for Big Pharma in the future.

Scientism is back folks.
 

Billy Hoyle

All Star
Joined
Dec 5, 2014
Messages
974
Reputation
140
Daps
2,971
Reppin
Auburn
Look at those who support the pushing out of this....the same clowns who support BigPharma. How many deaths of people from BigPharma drugs again? Oh that's right @88m3 @Melbournelad @Napolean don't look at the numbers because deaths aren't important. What is important is that there is no competition for Big Pharma in the future.

Scientism is back folks.
How many lives of people have been saved by BigPharma again? :mjpls:

How many lives of people have been saved by homeopathy? :sas2:

Which one of those do you think is a bigger racket? I promise it's homeopathy.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,343
Daps
115,994
Reppin
In the Silver Lining

Good what?
How many lives of people have been saved by BigPharma again? :mjpls:

How many lives of people have been saved by homeopathy? :sas2:

Which one of those do you think is a bigger racket? I promise it's homeopathy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/02/politics/02fda.html?_r=0

F.D.A. Official Admits 'Lapses' on Vioxx
By GARDINER HARRIS
spacer.gif

Published: March 2, 2005

Millions of people took Vioxx in the years after its risks to the heart became apparent. As a result, as many as 55,000 patients may have died from heart attacks and strokes induced by the drug, according to estimates by drug safety officials at the F.D.A. Merck withdrew the drug from the market in September, after a test showed that it doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke.


________________________________________________________________________________


^^^ Other articles say up to 500,000 died from this one drug. This is just one drug. :leostare:
 

Billy Hoyle

All Star
Joined
Dec 5, 2014
Messages
974
Reputation
140
Daps
2,971
Reppin
Auburn
Good what?


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/02/politics/02fda.html?_r=0

F.D.A. Official Admits 'Lapses' on Vioxx
By GARDINER HARRIS
spacer.gif

Published: March 2, 2005

Millions of people took Vioxx in the years after its risks to the heart became apparent. As a result, as many as 55,000 patients may have died from heart attacks and strokes induced by the drug, according to estimates by drug safety officials at the F.D.A. Merck withdrew the drug from the market in September, after a test showed that it doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke.


________________________________________________________________________________


^^^ Other articles say up to 500,000 died from this one drug. This is just one drug. :leostare:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio_vaccine

The two vaccines have eradicated polio from most countries in the world,[5][6] and reduced the worldwide incidence from an estimated 350,000 cases in 1988 to just 223 cases in 2012.[7][8]

So far only one disease, smallpox, has been eradicated by vaccines, saving approximately 5 million lives annually. Polio could be next. Over 80% of the world's children are now being immunized against the polio virus, and the annual number of cases has been cut from 400,000 in 1980 to 90,000 in the mid-1990s.

http://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm

http://health.howstuffworks.com/dis...deadly-diseases-cured-in-the-20th-century.htm

I mean, do I need to go on? Of course drugs have risks. The good that's come from western medicine FAR FAR FAR outweighs the bad. No I don't think BigPharma is fukking awesome, but neither are homeopathy companies. And only one of them has any government oversight whatsoever.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,343
Daps
115,994
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio_vaccine

The two vaccines have eradicated polio from most countries in the world,[5][6] and reduced the worldwide incidence from an estimated 350,000 cases in 1988 to just 223 cases in 2012.[7][8]

So far only one disease, smallpox, has been eradicated by vaccines, saving approximately 5 million lives annually. Polio could be next. Over 80% of the world's children are now being immunized against the polio virus, and the annual number of cases has been cut from 400,000 in 1980 to 90,000 in the mid-1990s.

http://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm

http://health.howstuffworks.com/dis...deadly-diseases-cured-in-the-20th-century.htm

I mean, do I need to go on? Of course drugs have risks. The good that's come from western medicine FAR FAR FAR outweighs the bad. No I don't think BigPharma is fukking awesome, but neither are homeopathy companies. And only one of them has any government oversight whatsoever.

This thread is not about vaccines, save that for a different thread.

:beli: So 50,000+ people die in a regulated industry from one pill. How many have died from unregulated homeopathy :lupe: :patrice:??

Show me some numbers, then we can talk. :coffee:
 
Last edited:
  • Dap
Reactions: Oso

Billy Hoyle

All Star
Joined
Dec 5, 2014
Messages
974
Reputation
140
Daps
2,971
Reppin
Auburn
I'm not talking about vaccines, save that for a different thread.

:beli: So 50,000+ people die in a regulated industry from one pill. How many have died from unregulated homeopathy :lupe: :patrice:

Show me some numbers, then we can talk. :coffee:
Where in the hell do you think vaccines come from if not Big Pharma? :comeon:

And which do you think would be in their interest, to vaccinate you or to medicate you? If their only interest was milking you, then vaccines wouldn't even exist. They'd much rather sell you a bunch of pills.

And I don't think homeopathy has killed anyone, mainly because it doesn't do jack shyt. It does nothing at all. It's a sugar pill. But dumbasses using it as a substitute for actual medicine die all the time.

https://sciencebasedpharmacy.wordpress.com/2013/11/23/use-of-homeopathy-kills-child/

Not to mention the fact that without any FDA oversight, they could easily put the wrong thing in one of their pills that kills people. You're basically trusting some a$$hole to make your drugs with nothing stopping them from doing something stupid and dangerous.
 
Top