FDR’s Letter To Corporate Democrats Will Blow Your Mind

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
81,940
Reputation
10,306
Daps
241,946
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC


When President Franklin D. Roosevelt made plans to run for a third term in 1940 he decided to drop conservative Vice President John Nance Garner from the ticket...Instead Roosevelt chose Secretary of Agriculture Henry Wallace. However, many of Garner's fellow conservative Democrats...despised Wallace for his liberalism and attempted to block his nomination at the convention...

Below is the letter which Roosevelt drafted, in which he vowed not to run if his fellow Democrats blocked his choice of Wallace. (In the end the letter was never sent, as a speech by Eleanor Roosevelt turned the tide for Wallace at the convention.) Roosevelt's letter, with its powerful critique of the Democratic Party, was published almost nowhere and was essentially unknown before it appeared in Oliver Stone's Showtime documentary series Untold History of the United States...

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/m...er-declining-1940-democratic-party-nomination


Franklin D. Roosevelt Letter to the Democratic Convention

July 18, 1940

Members of the Convention:

In the century in which we live, the Democratic Party has received the support of the electorate only when the party, with absolute clarity, has been the champion of progressive and liberal policies and principles of government.

The party has failed consistently when through political trading and chicanery it has fallen into the control of those interests, personal and financial, which think in terms of dollars instead of in terms of human values.

The Republican Party has made its nominations this year at the dictation of those who, we all know, always place money ahead of human progress.

The Democratic Convention, as appears clear from the events of today, is divided on this fundamental issue. Until the Democratic Party through this convention makes overwhelmingly clear its stand in favor of social progress and liberalism, and shakes off all the shackles of control fastened upon it by the forces of conservatism, reaction, and appeasement, it will not continue its march of victory.

It is without question that certain political influences pledged to reaction in domestic affairs and to appeasement in foreign affairs have been busily engaged behind the scenes in the promotion of discord since this Convention convened.

Under these circumstances, I cannot, in all honor, and will not, merely for political expediency, go along with the cheap bargaining and political maneuvering which have brought about party dissension in this convention.

It is best not to straddle ideals.

In these days of danger when democracy must be more than vigilant, there can be no connivance with the kind of politics which has internally weakened nations abroad before the enemy has struck from without.

It is best for America to have the fight out here and now.

I wish to give the Democratic Party the opportunity to make its historic decision clearly and without equivocation. The party must go wholly one way or wholly the other. It cannot face in both directions at the same time.

By declining the honor of the nomination for the presidency, I can restore that opportunity to the convention. I so do.
 

Dr. Acula

Posts on Dapcity.com
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
27,052
Reputation
9,422
Daps
144,772
I shared this on my page and got quite a few likes :leon: even from more "Center-left" types.

Like I said, i've seen more and more embracing of progressive politics, particularly with healthcare, than I have ever in my life in these past three months alone.

Maybe the only downside of having Trump not serve out his 4 years is that there will be a return of normalcy and embracing of "status quo" politics again.

I know progressives are frustrated with what they view as the constant distractions provided by Trump in lieu of focusing on more substantive issues such as trade, jobs, and healthcare. At the same time, it is also having the effect of mobilizing more and more people.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
81,940
Reputation
10,306
Daps
241,946
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
I shared this on my page and got quite a few likes :leon: even from more "Center-left" types.

Like I said, i've seen more and more embracing of progressive politics, particularly with healthcare, than I have ever in my life in these past three months alone.

Maybe the only downside of having Trump not serve out his 4 years is that there will be a return of normalcy and embracing of "status quo" politics again.

I know progressives are frustrated with what they view as the constant distractions provided by Trump in lieu of focusing on more substantive issues such as trade, jobs, and healthcare. At the same time, it is also having the effect of mobilizing more and more people.

Congressman Conyers says he hasn't seen the response to his bill, ever.

It now has 80 co sponsors! Just 115 more in the House


 

Antiquity

All Star
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
746
Reputation
340
Daps
3,296
Great video. Progressivism is what brought this country out of it's Great Depression collapse - and for the first time in political history put the people first and corporate entities last. FDR was an excellent president.

There's only one president that came after him that I believe was just as virtuous as he was...
 

Rout3r2035

Superstar
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
2,765
Reputation
2,150
Daps
15,374
Great video. Progressivism is what brought this country out of it's Great Depression collapse - and for the first time in political history put the people first and corporate entities last. FDR was an excellent president.

There's only one president that came after him that I believe was just as virtuous as he was...

Either JFK or Eisenhower I'm guessing?
 
Top