this dude getting caught-up in his own lies.. 


So when people say they saw a man was executed and the autopsy shows a head shot to the top of the head and the angle doesn't support the shooters narrative there is nothing wrong with that. Your objection is objecting to anything that might paint the officer in a negative light but you never seem to be critical of the police officer. And again breh you almost have to be stupid to try and argue the number of shots are irrelevant.
That's why I'm not making any conclusions until I hear him say his story. He says his orbital bone is fukked up. Ok, so show us. Him fleeing doesn't look good.U dumb ass nikka he is facing away from the vehicle he is so called charging.... troll ass nikka I should have known. Ignored

U dumb ass nikka he is facing away from the vehicle he is so called charging.... troll ass nikka I should have known. Ignored
They said he ran away, then he turned around and surrendered according to witnesses in the community, cop says he turned around and kept coming. Those are the two stories. I'm not saying one is true or false. To me, if you have an execution shot that's worth noting, I'm just telling you, the police are gonna spin this. It doesn't matter. The key for them is proving intent from Mike, how they do that, I have no idea, but if they can prove intent, they can spin it however they want.
I can't be critical of the officer because I don't know anything about his story other than hearsayThat's why I'm not making any conclusions until I hear him say his story. He says his orbital bone is fukked up. Ok, so show us. Him fleeing doesn't look good.
I've heard the witnesses over and over, I can't pick apart or speculate on a side I've haven't really heard. I've already said it's shady that the cop hasn't at least been taken in. Even Zimmerman was taken in.
The police been telling you his story that he was somehow fearing his life and shot Mike as he was charging you were even running with that story up and down this thread but all of sudden you can't be critical of him because you don't know his story 
They said he ran away, then he turned around and surrendered according to witnesses in the community, cop says he turned around and kept coming. Those are the two stories. I'm not saying one is true or false.
I know i'm ignored but fukk it.
That's why I'm not making any conclusions until I hear him say his story"The police been telling you his story that he was somehow fearing his life and shot Mike as he was charging you were even running with that story up and down this thread but all of sudden you can't be critical of him because you don't know his story
You have no problem being critical of the witness stories that were not told by Mike Brown since he's dead but somehow you can't be critical of the officer because he hasn't spoken.
I've been critical of both sides but you just want me to blindly believe a bunch of witnesses and say, "Case closed, it's a wrap." I'm not doing that.