First Brand Split question

[Sonny Corinthos]

I'm watching Vengeance 03' right now and they are claiming this is Smackdowns first PPV.

I remember this whole era but I don't remember this whole era. I'm just looking for a time span whether it's 03-05 of how long these shows were seperate.

I know Smackdown has the Smackdown six, great Lesnar matches, JBL, King Booker and Thuganomics Cener...so it has to be a couple years worth of ppvs.

 

[Silkk]

I'm watching Vengeance 03' right now and they are claiming this is Smackdowns first PPV.

I remember this whole era but I don't remember this whole era. I'm just looking for a time span whether it's 03-05 of how long these shows were seperate.

I know Smackdown has the Smackdown six, great Lesnar matches, JBL, King Booker and Thuganomics Cener...so it has to be a couple years worth of ppvs.

But yea

Pay-per-views[edit]
The separation of the WWE roster between two brands also intended to split the pay-per-view offerings, which began with Bad Blood in June 2003.[31] The original idea had the "major" pay-per-view events at the time (Royal Rumble, SummerSlam, Survivor Series, and WrestleMania) would contain the only instances where wrestlers from different brands would interact with each other, and even among the four shows only the Royal Rumble and WrestleMania would have wrestlers from different brands competing against each other. Wrestlers, as a result, appeared only in two-thirds of the shows in a given year, and thus appeared in fewer shows compared to before the brand extension. With single-brand PPVs in place, WWE was able to add more pay-per-view events to their offerings, such as Taboo Tuesday/Cyber Sunday, New Year's Revolution, December to Dismember, and The Great American Bash. Eventually, WWE abandoned the practice of single-brand pay-per-view events followingWrestleMania 23.[32] December to Dismember and New Year's Revolution were cancelled following the announcement.

 

[Sonny Corinthos]

But yea

Pay-per-views[edit]
The separation of the WWE roster between two brands also intended to split the pay-per-view offerings, which began with Bad Blood in June 2003.[31] The original idea had the "major" pay-per-view events at the time (Royal Rumble, SummerSlam, Survivor Series, and WrestleMania) would contain the only instances where wrestlers from different brands would interact with each other, and even among the four shows only the Royal Rumble and WrestleMania would have wrestlers from different brands competing against each other. Wrestlers, as a result, appeared only in two-thirds of the shows in a given year, and thus appeared in fewer shows compared to before the brand extension. With single-brand PPVs in place, WWE was able to add more pay-per-view events to their offerings, such as Taboo Tuesday/Cyber Sunday, New Year's Revolution, December to Dismember, and The Great American Bash. Eventually, WWE abandoned the practice of single-brand pay-per-view events followingWrestleMania 23.[32] December to Dismember and New Year's Revolution were cancelled following the announcement.

You know what I mean breh

I was barely following the weekly shows but I remember ordering ppvs, shyt don't make any sense now that I think about it

 

[mortuus est]

i miss that era

 

[jackswstd]

Smackdown was shytting on Raw during that time

 

[Sonny Corinthos]

Smackdown was shytting on Raw during that time

Yeah it's not even close, they really made it known their was a difference in each brand for sure.