Five facts about student loans

OfTheCross

Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,109
Reputation
4,892
Daps
98,192
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
1. SIX PERCENT OF BORROWERS OWE A THIRD OF ALL THE OUTSTANDING DEBT.
A very small fraction of all student loan borrowers have very large loans. Six percent of borrowers owe more than $100,000 in debt, with 2 percent owing more than $200,000. This 6 percent owes one-third of the outstanding $1.5 trillion of debt. At the other extreme, 18 percent of borrowers owe less than $5,000 in student loan debt. They collectively owe 1 percent of the debt outstanding.

2. ABOUT ONE QUARTER OF STUDENT LOAN BORROWERS, WHO HAVE ABOUT HALF THE DEBT OUTSTANDING, BORROWED FOR GRADUATE SCHOOL.
Out of all households with student debt, only 26 percent are headed by an individual with a graduate degree. While only a small share of households with student debt have a graduate degree, loans associated with graduate degrees account for 50 percent of the total outstanding student loan debt. In contrast, 42 percent of households with student debt are headed by someone without a bachelor’s degree; they only account for ¼ of the total outstanding debt.

3. INDIVIDUALS WHO OWE THE MOST ARE NOT THE INDIVIDUALS WHO DEFAULT ON DEBT.
Borrowers with graduate degrees have the lowest default rates despite accounting for about half of all student debt. Higher default rates are more common for students who went to for-profit institutions. Forty percent of borrowers from for-profit two-year programs default on their loans within five years of entering repayment, and 32 percent of those who went to for-profit four-year programs defaulted in this same time frame. Among students who went to public community colleges, about 25 percent default within five years of entering repayment. Defaults are much less frequent among those who borrowed to go to public or private non-profit four-year schools.

4. MOST BACHELOR’S DEGREE RECIPIENTS GRADUATE WITH LITTLE TO NO DEBT.
Thirty percent of all bachelor’s degree recipients graduate with no debt, and another 23 percent graduate with less than $20,000 in loans. Fewer than 20 percent of all borrowers owed more than $40,000. Among for-profit schools, nearly half of all borrowers owed more than $40,000, but only 12 percent of those who attended four-year public colleges owed the same amount.

5. EVEN IF FINANCIAL AID COVERS THE WHOLE TUITION BILL, MANY STUDENTS STILL BORROW TO COVER LIVING COSTS.
Many students borrow to not only cover their tuition and fees but also to get cash to finance the cost of living while they are in school. An Urban Institute analysis conducted using the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study finds that student borrowing patterns among those for whom all tuition is covered by scholarships and grants (no net tuition) are similar to those who have to pay tuition. For students at public universities and colleges with no net tuition, 22 percent borrow $30,000 or more; on average, they borrow $24,000. In comparison, 23 percent of those who pay average net tuition of more than $5,000 borrowed $30,000 or more; on average, they borrow $28,000.

Five facts about student loans
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,790
Reputation
4,579
Daps
63,121
Yeah but not retroactive
Um forgiving debt is only retroactive. That’s a drop in the bucket compared to other things that we pay for I.e. bailing out Wall Street. The fact is, people of color have more debt than anyone else on average and an entire generation was told to go to college or else they’re fukked. Most people don’t understand that financing at that age. This whole game you’re playing of trying to make the debt crisis some bougie affair presumably because you paid yours off can apply to damn near any progressive policy. Why should I give a fukk about making these prescription drugs more affordable? I had to pay for mine out of pocket and sacrificed my car to do it.
 

OfTheCross

Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,109
Reputation
4,892
Daps
98,192
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
Um forgiving debt is only retroactive. That’s a drop in the bucket compared to other things that we pay for I.e. bailing out Wall Street. The fact is, people of color have more debt than anyone else on average and an entire generation was told to go to college or else they’re fukked. Most people don’t understand that financing at that age. This whole game you’re playing of trying to make the debt crisis some bougie affair presumably because you paid yours off can apply to damn near any progressive policy. Why should I give a fukk about making these prescription drugs more affordable? I had to pay for mine out of pocket and sacrificed my car to do it.

Well then we shouldn't do it.

If they want to stop college costs going forward, fine.

But look at the OP. 6% of borrowers owe 33% of the debt. And they pay back cause they're the doctors and shyt. Let them pay.

I'm for capping repayment to 3X the tuition/loan amount and cap the monthly payment based on income
 

Yapdatfool

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
7,817
Reputation
1,048
Daps
20,912
Reppin
NULL
Um forgiving debt is only retroactive. That’s a drop in the bucket compared to other things that we pay for I.e. bailing out Wall Street. The fact is, people of color have more debt than anyone else on average and an entire generation was told to go to college or else they’re fukked. Most people don’t understand that financing at that age. This whole game you’re playing of trying to make the debt crisis some bougie affair presumably because you paid yours off can apply to damn near any progressive policy. Why should I give a fukk about making these prescription drugs more affordable? I had to pay for mine out of pocket and sacrificed my car to do it.

THIS.

Anybody with this mindset has none of the same energy about ANY other bailouts but this one, over and over again.
 
Top