PWTorch VIP member Marc from New York asks: Hey Wade, I completely understand your criticism of Daniel Bryan vs. the McMahon/Orton/Shield faction storyline. However, I feel that the angle is getting over better than you are giving it credit for. Here are my sort of devil's advocate reasons as to why this angle is working.
1. Bryan is getting tremendous ovations and crowd reactions. The babyface who stands alone against insurmountable odds is a time-tested angle which draws by Supreme Savings">money. If the babyface gets his heat back too quickly, then his comeback has less importance.
2. Big Show is being stripped of his pride, and I think could turn heel off of it. He does Hunter's bidding and turns on the fans because they don't understand why he is doing the cowardly things that he does.
3. When Cody Rhodes jumps the rail in two weeks to help Bryan, it will mean more for Cody and get him over huge. If eight babyfaces had helped Bryan before, then it takes away the impact. They need the first time a babyface runs in to count.
4. Babyface acts such as Kofi Kingston and the Uso's are worth sacrificing to get over the idea of a totalitarian regime. Plus no money drawing acts like John Cena, C.M. Punk, Undertaker, or Sheamus are made to look bad in this story. Who cares if a couple of lower mid-card babyfaces and a novelty act in his 40s (Big Show) look bad.
I will admit that parts of this angle could be done better, I feel like this angle is like '80s hair metal. Poison, and Winger weren't great bands, and the music wasn't very good, but a lot of people liked it, and those bands made a lot of money. Not everything needs to be technically perfect, or in a wrestling sense, be logical to
by Supreme Savings">make money and be successful. However, I defer to a wrestling expert when it comes to these things, and I would appreciate if you went through the points I make above, and tell me why I am wrong. Thanks for reading, and as always keep up the great work.
PWTorch editor Wade Keller answers: When I am critical of this angle, I am also torn for some of the reasons you list above (and others). First, there is a bit of history to the "Triple H Center of the Universe blindspot" that anything Triple H is part of has to get past, and I'm not sure this angle does.
This angle so far has made Randy Orton a background player. Yes, he stood over Bryan's fallen body at the end of the show, but overall he is in a subservient role to the mighty Triple H. I think by now Orton would have been more of a focus of this angle.
He seems practically like Hunter's bodyguard and surrogate champion for Triple H. Yes, Triple H talks the talk about Orton being the proper Face of the Company, but Orton "feels" like he's subservient to Hunter by a great distance and was simply chosen by Triple H to carry the gold for him and his family, yet Orton is the one headlining PPVs and house shows, not Hunter. I think that's an issue, but a separate one from the points you bring up.
Yes! Bryan is over, but he was over before this angle took place. I don't think the negative side effects from this angle rub off onto him enough to totally kill his momentum. However, there was a problem on Raw on Monday night that is always present in how WWE presents Bryan, and it's pulling Bryan down more than lifting him up.
Why was Show, an overweight, over-the-hill non-title-contender booked to be the guy who obviously would defeat a fresh Daniel Bryan in a fair fight? I mean, Bryan just pinned John Cena clean a few weeks ago, but now Bryan is being booked like 1-2-3 Kid against Razor Ramon. That's not "a small detail," that's a big deal.
I'd argue Bryan right now is over despite how he's booked more than because of it. Remember, Bryan got over in the midst of wrestling The Shield every week, before Triple H and Vince McMahon decided to glom onto his popularity
and try to tear him down to get heel heat and explain to fans why they shouldn't be popping for him like they do. I just hated how, on Raw on Monday, Show was booked to be the obviously dominantly tougher guy who was going to easily badly hurt Bryan in a fair fight.
WWE's mindset is still so big-man-centric that it doesn't even cross their minds that fans don't see Bryan as the "obvious massive underdog" against Big Show, because if that were the case, they wouldn't believe in him as a serious threat in the main event division in general, and that by constantly stressing how small and unlikely a main eventer he is as being "a given," it creates a totally unnecessary and counter-productive headwind to Bryan's momentum.