Depreciation isn't a real cash out the door expense
I understand the concept of time, and money. That's why I save my money ahead of time, buy a car outright and don't loan. The cars I buy I can afford so I don't take out a loan. I'm not out driving the latest Audi. That extra thousands of dollars stays in my pocket.
Most people don't 1. live beneath their means in order to save and 2. buy a car within their means.
I'm not talking about just low income people. Even middle income people don't get that idea. It's cash just flushed down the toilet. You can see that as a positive if you are looking at it from a car salesman point of view.
Do you understand the concept of time value of money?
I understand the concept of time, and money. That's why I save my money ahead of time, buy a car outright and don't loan. The cars I buy I can afford so I don't take out a loan. I'm not out driving the latest Audi. That extra thousands of dollars stays in my pocket.
Unless the interest rate is 0%, then getting a loan is not better than paying cash. 0% financing is always on new cars, never used cars.This is generally a good rule, but I think what @The Realist Perspective meant was that interest rates right now are actually lower than inflation. So getting a loan is actually a better deal than paying cash, especially if you can invest that money at a rate greater than inflation (which, right now is almost impossible not to do).
Unless the interest rate is 0%, then getting a loan is not better than paying cash. 0% financing is always on new cars, never used cars.
Do you understand the concept of time value of money?

Okay. That investopedia article is GOOD. I said good. This is what you don't get. Whether you finance or buy outright, that car is going to depreciate the same.So then, you should have answered this question...
...with "no".
No shade, but the way you answered it "I understand the concept of time and money" isn't the same thing as time value of money.
Time value of money is the central concept in the world of finance and investing, just like how supply and demand is the central concept of economics. Give this article a read.
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/03/082703.asp
You must be broke investing that's not a lot of money to make in 4 years at all. I mean everything you talked about in this thread while solid seems like you on the path to living a mediocre existence. Hope you enjoy all that saving and sacrificing of enjoyment at the end.Okay. That investopedia article is GOOD. I said good. This is what you don't get. Whether you finance or buy outright, that car is going to depreciate the same.
The OP had bullet point #4, a car is a horrible investment.
I'm saying you are better off paying for $10,000 for a car outright because you end up paying $0 in interest. I will lose money on that car through depreciation in four years. The value of that car might be $6,000 after four years. That's an example. I lose $4,000.
If you finance a car over four years, you will pay $10,000 plus interest. As an example, if you got a loan at 3% and your loan was for 48 months, you would pay a total of $13,958.88. So after four years, it is also going to be worth $6,000. That means you lose $4,000 plus $3,958.88. That's a total of $7,958.88. If you have $10,000 up front, and you pay out $290 in the first month. You have $9,710 to invest in the next four years to make more than $7,958.88 in order to break even. You have to be very lucky at stocks to make that much in four years. More likely than not, you won't break even after four years.
So that's why I'm saying buying new and paying interest is not more beneficial than buying a car outright without a loan.You must be broke investing that's not a lot of money to make in 4 years at all. I
Well in your situation yes but something we all have to realize at times is your/my situation on any situation isn't universal. Just as many people disagree as agree with you so its a you do you and vice versa.So that's why I'm saying buying new and paying interest is not more beneficial than buying a car outright without a loan.
Okay. That investopedia article is GOOD. I said good. This is what you don't get. Whether you finance or buy outright, that car is going to depreciate the same.
The OP had bullet point #4, a car is a horrible investment.
I'm saying you are better off paying for $10,000 for a car outright because you end up paying $0 in interest. I will lose money on that car through depreciation in four years. The value of that car might be $6,000 after four years. That's an example. I lose $4,000.
If you finance a car over four years, you will pay $10,000 plus interest. As an example, if you got a loan at 3% and your loan was for 48 months, you would pay a total of $13,958.88. So after four years, it is also going to be worth $6,000. That means you lose $4,000 plus $3,958.88. That's a total of $7,958.88. If you have $10,000 up front, and you pay out $290 in the first month. You have $9,710 to invest in the next four years to make more than $7,958.88 in order to break even. You have to be very lucky at stocks to make that much in four years. More likely than not, you won't break even after four years.
).
Unless the interest rate is 0%, then getting a loan is not better than paying cash. 0% financing is always on new cars, never used cars.
. 
If any Dodge dealer has a new 2014 Challenger left on the lot on Jan. 2015, you could haggle them down to 24,000 without a trade. Think about that and tell me you think it's a good investment.Bought a 2011 Challenger R/T for 30,000 after financing. Dealer offered 24,500 for trade in if I wanted to get a 2015. Probably not going to do it. But I'm pretty happy with my "Investment". Essentially I would have drove a new car for 3 years for about 6500. Not bad
Point being, if you get a good deal and buy a car with a good resale value, fiancing isn't so bad
Trade-ins are not your friend.If any Dodge dealer has a new 2014 Challenger left on the lot on Jan. 2015, you could haggle them down to 24,000 without a trade. Think about that and tell me you think it's a good investment.Trade-ins are not your friend.