"Fracking Wastewater Dumped into Protected California Aquifers" .............................or Not

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,333
Daps
115,993
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
http://www.planetizen.com/node/71609

Fracking Wastewater Dumped into Protected California Aquifers


Thursday, October 9, 2014 - 1:00pm PDT byIRVIN DAWID
Energy, Environment, Government / Politics, United States, California

According to the Center for Biological Diversity, toxic wastewater from oil industry fracking operations has been illegally injected into Central Valley disposal sites, posing a threat to water supplies of nearby residents.
In late July we noted that 11 fracking wastewater injection sites had been shut down "out of fear that companies may have been pumping fracking fluids and other toxic waste into drinking water aquifers." The aquifers by the injection sites had initially been "deemed useless for drinking and farming and exempted from environmental protection." Well, the results are in, and they are not good.

Mike G. of Desmogblog.com [http://www.desmogblog.com/2014/10/07/central-california-aquifers-contaminated-billions-gallons-fracking-wastewater] writes that "the California State Water Resources Board has sent a letter to the EPA confirming that at least nine of those sites were in fact dumping wastewater contaminated with fracking fluids and other pollutants into aquifers protected by state law and the federal Safe Drinking Water Act."

The letter, a copy of which was obtained by the Center for Biological Diversity, reveals that nearly 3 billion gallons of wastewater were illegally injected into central California aquifers and that half of the water samples collected at the 8 water supply wells tested near the injection sites have high levels of dangerous chemicals such as arsenic, a known carcinogen that can also weaken the human immune system, and thallium, a toxin used in rat poison.

“The fact that high concentrations are showing up in multiple water wells close to wastewater injection sites raises major concerns about the health and safety of nearby residents,” said Timothy Krantz, a professor of environmental studies at the University of Redlands.

“Much more testing is needed to gauge the full extent of water pollution and the threat to public health,” said Hollin Kretzmann, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, in her organization's press release.

A Yale University study of natural gas fracking wells in southwestern Pennsylvania posted here last month determined that "Residents Living Near Fracking Suffer Negative Health Impacts."

However, a report done for the Bureau of Land Management posted here in September concluded that "Fracking Doesn't Pose Danger to California Groundwater."
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,333
Daps
115,993
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
In contrast.......Keep in mind though this was reported last month..... which one is it, polluting a droughted out state's aquifers with wastewater or no ..... :lupe: :patrice:

http://www.planetizen.com/node/71044

Report: Fracking Doesn't Pose Danger to California Groundwater


Wednesday, September 3, 2014 - 10:00am PDT byIRVIN DAWID
Energy, Environment, Government / Politics, California

The Bureau of Land Management will resume oil and gas leasing in California after a report by a scientific research organization established by the state legislature showed no correlation between fracking and groundwater pollution.

"The studyn
[http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-fracking-report-20140829-story.html] was conducted by the California Council on Science and Technology, a nonpartisan scientific research organization established by the state Legislature [in 1988] to advise state officials," writes Julie Cart, environmental reporter for the Los Angeles Times. Based on the report's findings released Thursday (August 28) "that found little scientific evidence that fracking and similar extraction techniques are dangerous, the federal government will resume oil and gas leasing in California."

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) commissioned the study, "Well Stimulation in California," after it lost a lawsuit in April, 2013 brought by fracking opponents Center for Biological Diversity and the Sierra Club who argued that additional environmental review was needed before BLM could auction rights for drilling in the Monterey Shale formation.


However, Cart writes that the "authors noted that they had little time and scant information on which to base conclusions, citing widespread 'data gaps' and inadequate scientific resources for a more thorough study."

That was the main point that David R. Baker, energy and clean tech reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle, emphasized in his piece. "There are no recorded cases of that happening in California, the authors note, but it remains a possibility needing further study," he writes.

The report will provide guidance for safe drilling operations, said Jim Kenna, the bureau's California state director. The report delves into issues ranging from the amount of water used by fracking in California - an amount significantly smaller than in other states - to the possibility that disposing of fracking waste water deep underground could trigger earthquakes.
 
Top