spliz
SplizThaDon
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 65,428
- Reputation
- 10,269
- Daps
- 218,591
- Reppin
- NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
Look at that Twitter handle. Smh.
She was still going off mad
He said fukk Kaep because the nikka settled, still begging for a job in the League, and people riding for him and shytting on Hov when the nikka got cashed out by the NFL already, and getting checks from Nike.I honestly dont know what Jay is doing. I dont know what he’s gonna own. I damn sure aint finna say fukk Kaep on the “premise” of this nikka owning shyt tho. What if Jay dont own a team? Is it still “fukk Kaep”? nikkas really be puttin they foot in they mouths.

.....bruh that is compensation for being blackballed by his employer.....and yes Jay turned down the performance but now look at that nikka???...you proved my point for me....thank you....
....just because people didn't listen to him still doesn't prove he wasn't meddling in others affairs when it came to the NFL....and now he has his own deal...I already know why they picked Jay Z in the first place.....
....
All of it.....if you out here thinking Kaep just settled and took a deal then you obviously did not do your research.....He said fukk Kaep because the nikka settled, still begging for a job in the League, and people riding for him and shytting on Hov when the nikka got cashed out by the NFL already, and getting checks from Nike.
Yes, saying fukk Kaep is harsh, but in the age of the internet, trolling gets more engagement. Gibbs knows this, so he said that and it got people's attention, but when he went in to why it's "fukk Kaep" was what he was saying not true?
![]()
1. The NFL CBA did not allow Kaep to outright sue the NFL civilly. You MUST go through arbitration.
2. The arbitration is ALL or NOTHING, meaning the arbitrator must rule completely for Kaep or the NFL. If the arbitrator rules in favor for the NFL, KAEP would get nothing (no job, no money, no admittance of guilt from the NFL)
3. When the arbitrator dismissed the NFL's motion for a summary judgement, KAEP WON. There was enough evidence to show that the NFL (at least some teams) possibly colluded to keep him from playing. But no one TREATED it like a win. Why?
4. The evidence brought forth in arbitration would NEVER become public (not legally, at least). If he won, he still could not discuss the findings, and the NFL still would not have to admit any fault. Only the judgement in his favor would be public. I was wrong, like many others, to think that Kaep's settlement was the reason for this.
5. The NFL initiated the settlement after their summary judgment was dismissed.
6. Kaep still wanted to play football. It's his livlihood and passion.Whether he won, loss or settled, the NFL still could not be forced to hire him.
7. Not settling would be a gigantic gamble. Remember, Kaep's case was against the NFL(all 32 teams). Proving that every team was involved in collusion is EXTREMELY difficult. And when you say "NFL", are we talking about Goddell?executives? GMs? Coaches? Everyone? Kaep's ability to take his case as far as he did is amazing.
8. Between showing that there was some level of collusion, getting a reasonable money settlement, knowing the NFL would not be forced to hire him anyway, knowing the arbitration findings would be sealed no matter what, and that the arbitrator had to side with him COMPLETELY, he took the settlement.
So we celebrate Kaep taking a deal, but shyt on Hov taking a deal?All of it.....if you out here thinking Kaep just settled and took a deal then you obviously did not do your research.....
That's alot of "If's" bruh....I deal in facts....its a fact Jay Z ran his mouth to others about their own NFL dealings and how they should approach them....and now he taking the bag from the NFL from whom he was criticizing....it don't add up....there is a difference between being an actual owner and just random figure head who manipulated his way into the picture....like I said I see the bigger picture you just don't....What has kaep spoken on since taking the settlement? The only thing he has said is that he is ready to go back and play for the same league and racist owners that blackballed him. If kaep signs to a team what has changed? The same people will still be in control. Are the owners no longer racist if he gets signed? If not then then why would yall stop protesting? If anyone is a sell out its kaep for trying to come back to play in the league and for the same racist owners.
I do know that if a black man is an owner he will have some control and influence that will change things.
And Jay turned down being an employee and unpaid halftime show performer. He is a partner and in control of the whole thing now. Pretty big difference. The climate was much different at the time cause kaep and Eric hadn't settled yet.
....If you look at it as Kaep taking a deal then you just don't understand period....Kaep took a big ass gamble when he went at the NFL....Jay Z just took the bag....So we celebrate Kaep taking a deal, but shyt on Hov taking a deal?
Am I missing something here?
There’s no way you’ve been keeping up with this storySo we celebrate Kaep taking a deal, but shyt on Hov taking a deal?
Am I missing something here?
That's alot of "If's" bruh....I deal in facts....its a fact Jay Z ran his mouth to others about their own NFL dealings and how they should approach them....and now he taking the bag from the NFL from whom he was criticizing....it don't add up....there is a difference between being an actual owner and just random figure head who manipulated his way into the picture....like I said I see the bigger picture you just don't........
Be a dumbass bruh's.....Oh I see your bigger picture. When white folks become owners they earned it no questions asked. When a black man does it he manipulated the system. Got it.
He said fukk Kaep because the nikka settled, still begging for a job in the League, and people riding for him and shytting on Hov when the nikka got cashed out by the NFL already, and getting checks from Nike.
Yes, saying fukk Kaep is harsh, but in the age of the internet, trolling gets more engagement. Gibbs knows this, so he said that and it got people's attention, but when he went in to why it's "fukk Kaep" was what he was saying not true?
![]()
no it aint true because the nikka sued. U think he spent money on lawyers and sued the fukkin NFL for nothing? Was he not supposed to take the damages he sued for? His initial issue wasnt even with the NFL. It was for police brutality. The NFL ended up blackballing him. So he HAD to sue because he wasnt able to work. JAY was the one running around telling people not to perform in the NFL. Just to turn around and make a deal with them. And that’s even fine. But the way he did this whole shyt is kinda funny style and it makes people question motives.This...Jay Z has really convinced ppl that a win for him is a win for them![]()