Freedom of speech has to be checked. Propaganda news label for Faux News, lying and undeserved demonizing on "real" news should be a criminal charge.

[DetroitEWarren]

This would legitimately put an end to the brainwashing that's been going on for years. I also believe that if you are caught in racist activity on YouTube or any live video, you should be charged with a crime abd the person filming should receive a reasonable award for posting it (1000-3000$).

Could rules like this be the beginning of the end of white supremacy in America? This is my reasonable take. Cause personally, dudes like Tucker, the Murdock family, Alex Jones, I'd just kill them and instill fear in the rest of em. Dare them to continue the brainwashing and off each host every time there is a blatant lie on TV.

 

[wenis]

The loss of the FCC Fairness Doctrine is still reverberating through time.

 

[DetroitEWarren]

The loss of the FCC Fairness Doctrine is still reverberating through time.

What was that?

 

[wenis]

What was that?

The fairness doctrine had two basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows, or editorials. The doctrine did not require equal time for opposing views but required that contrasting viewpoints be presented. The demise of this FCC rule has been cited as a contributing factor in the rising level of party polarization in the United States.

Pulled it off Wikipedia since it’s an easy summation of what it was and what it’s removal led to.

Fairness doctrine - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

A world where you could hear both sides and people would be able to see and hear what they were in a neutral way that wasn’t as it is now which is a trough of basically whatever viewpoint you prefer and gorging yourself on it till your overfed, angry and belligerent.

 

[ThatTruth777]

They'll spin it into how do you define racism and then point at you know where.

 

[DetroitEWarren]

Pulled it off Wikipedia since it’s an easy summation of what it was and what it’s removal led to.

Fairness doctrine - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

What year was this ended? As a youngin, I don't remember seeing sources like Faux News blatantly lying on News broadcasts.

 

[Luke Cage]

What year was this ended? As a youngin, I don't remember seeing sources like Faux News blatantly lying on News broadcasts.

Reagan put an end to it.

 

[wenis]

What year was this ended? As a youngin, I don't remember seeing sources like Faux News blatantly lying on News broadcasts.

1987

Fox News would be launched in 1996

 

[Easy-E]

The loss of the FCC Fairness Doctrine is still reverberating through time.

This and Telcom Act

 

[DetroitEWarren]

They'll spin it into how do you define racism and then point at you know where.

Think about that though. How many times do you see random ass black people just bothering white dudes for no reason? Even in the hood, in downtown areas, in white pubs that's in inner city downtown areas, THE shyt DOES NOT HAPPEN. It's just some shyt that black people don't do.

As a nikka that been in the hood my whole life, YES, weak nikkas get picked on, probably more than in any other culture. Hood bully nikkas do bother nikkas at the barber shop or basketball court, ect. But we don't bother strangers, abd we definitely don't bother people for the color of their skin. That shyt just doesn't happen on this side

 

[ThatTruth777]

Think about that though. How many times do you see random ass black people just bothering white dudes for no reason? Even in the hood, in downtown areas, in white pubs that's in inner city downtown areas, THE shyt DOES NOT HAPPEN. It's just some shyt that black people don't do.

As a nikka that been in the hood my whole life, YES, weak nikkas get picked on, probably more than in any other culture. Hood bully nikkas do bother nikkas at the barber shop or basketball court, ect. But we don't bother strangers, abd we definitely don't bother people for the color of their skin. That shyt just doesn't happen on this side

I get what you're saying but if we're going off what you see. They'll go off of what they "see" as well, likely never experienced. And by that I mean they'll view videos of black people doing foul or dumb shyt like on reddit, twitter, youtube, etc. And then talk about how black people are the real racist. Like with this anti-asian stuff that happened not too long ago. They'll repost videos of black people doing the shyt (probably got some on reddit today lol) but when you look at the actual numbers of it all, its not us doing the most. But that doesn't matter because they keep those incidents fresh with repost. You just replace asian in that example with anything else and that's their modus operandi.

And its not like I'm in opposition to the law you're proposing. Its just we both know that shyt aint happening. I'm just telling you that if it did, it would be a win for a while but conservatives always come back with retaliation or a way to mitigate because they hate justice among many other things lol.

 

[MajesticLion]

Citizens

United

 

[OperationNumbNutts]

The same people who own the media also are major donors to politicians. Let that sink in.