@DEAD7 he said itHe's such a Gaddressing the cause of issues is the only way to solve problems. When people start focusing on this and realising the government doesn't really want to solve the issues then we will move forwards
The "gang issue" or problem is working perfectly fine though. Institutions intentionally aren't being held probably accountable for their actions. The argument you're intending to bring forward is culture vs government, which in essence can kick off a debacle of whether the chicken came before the egg paradigm. When referencing segments of black america, what blaming the culture fails to assess,is the inequitable distribution of resources. While not blaming culture isn't a cop out for allowing degenerate behavior to persist, it's disingenuous to dismiss all the road blocks that hinder a historically disenfranchised and marginalized culture. Government and policy are what allowed generations of setbacks to persist, so suddenly shifting the blame to culture, negates all the unfair gains established by those in power.we gotta remove race or any identity groups from gangs and tackle the "gang problem." My definition of a gang problem is degenerates terrorizing communities
There are good and bad arguments for the different types of governments that oversees various cultures in the world
Let's be honest, there's no "gang problem" in certain types of governments that oversees certain cultures because there's no tolerance for it and the punishment compliments it. Despite these countries having some of the same indicators that he mentioned, poverty/poor school/lack of education
So the penalty and tolerance does play a role in addressing the gang problem
What countries are you referring to that have no gang problems?we gotta remove race or any identity groups from gangs and tackle the "gang problem." My definition of a gang problem is degenerates terrorizing communities
There are good and bad arguments for the different types of governments that oversees various cultures in the world
Let's be honest, there's no "gang problem" in certain types of governments that oversees certain cultures because there's no tolerance for it and the punishment compliments it. Despite these countries having some of the same indicators that he mentioned, poverty/poor school/lack of education
So the penalty and tolerance does play a role in addressing the gang problem
Start with the obvious Islamic countriesWhat countries are you referring to that have no gang problems?
Show me where a pedophile is able to make millions from endorsements and is interviewed on main stream mediaThe "gang issue" or problem is working perfectly fine though. Institutions intentionally aren't being held probably accountable for their actions. The argument you're intending to bring forward is culture vs government, which in essence can kick off a debacle of whether the chicken came before the egg paradigm. When referencing segments of black america, what blaming the culture fails to assess,is the inequitable distribution of resources. While not blaming culture isn't a cop out for allowing degenerate behavior to persist, it's disingenuous to dismiss all the road blocks that hinder a historically disenfranchised and marginalized culture. Government and policy are what allowed generations of setbacks to persist, so suddenly shifting the blame to culture, negates all the unfair gains established by those in power.
This conversation dives tremendously deeper when corruption and neocolonialism enter the picture.
WTF? they are the gang.Start with the obvious Islamic countries
What gang problem is Saudi Arabia and Palestine?
How about Israel? Cuba?
Why is it that organized crime and organized terror groups don't have "gang problems" in the local areas they "control"? because the punishment is swift, harsh, and consistant
Show me where a pedophile is able to make millions from endorsements and is interviewed on main stream media
You can't be talmbowt institutions not being held accountable to dismiss the obvious high tolerance that too many communities have with gang culture; especially when certain types of government are limited/hindered in what they could do to address gang culture
personal responsibility means nothing, if not complimented by societal responsibility, and vice versa
Make gang affiliation illegal, complete the cipher with social stigma and harsh punishments, then see if there are any improvements. All of these efforts complimented by institutions doing their part will "solve" the gang problem
Ok that's how it is...we finna lazily group Isis, Al-qaeda, Yakuza, Italian mob and the Mongols BC to Crips/Bloods, football clubs, and MS-13? just for the sole purpose to "win" at all cost/stop the opposition/not fit a label...but not to solve a problem. Which is partly why San Fran has a tent cityWTF? they are the gang.
![]()
1. How does the classification of organized crime cause San Francisco to have a large homeless population?Ok that's how it is...we finna lazily group Isis, Al-qaeda, Yakuza, Italian mob and the Mongols BC to Crips/Bloods, football clubs, and MS-13? just for the sole purpose to "win" at all cost/stop the opposition/not fit a label...but not to solve a problem. Which is partly why San Fran has a tent city
It's not about organized crime, it's about what's deem more important...solving the homeless problem isn't it1. How does the classification of organized crime cause San Francisco to have a large homeless population?
2. The places you listed that you claim don't have a gang problem are places that have very highly organized crime syndicates that
maintain some influence on politics. Still gang problems.
This thread needs to be deletedIf that's the case, then the social indicators that make up the breh's argument doesn't apply to all these "gangs." So he is completely wrong