Genetics, not upbringing, main influencer in a child’s IQ, study says

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,756
Daps
2,325
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/...ging-main-influencer-in-childs-iq-study-says/

Published October 30, 2014
FoxNews.com
Facebook227 Twitter68 livefyre83 Email Print
660_kid_reading.jpg

(iStock)

Can parents make their kids smarter? New research published in the journal Intelligence suggests they can’t influence intelligence— at least beyond their genetic contribution.

To answer the oft-asked question, professors at Florida State University, the University of Nebraska, West Illinois University, King Abdulaziz in Saudi Arabia, and Erasmus University in the Netherlands used an adoption-based research design.

The study authors drew participants from a representative sample of between 5,500-7,000 non-adopted youth and a sample of between 250-300 adopted children from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.

Researchers first administered a Picture Vocabulary Test (PVT) to middle and high school students and then repeated the test when the participants were between the ages of 18 and 26. The PVT served as an IQ test in which participants had to identify photos of people, places and things. Researchers also analyzed their parents’ behaviors.

Researchers found that parental socialization had no detectable influence on children’s intelligence later in life.

“Previous research that has detected parenting-related behaviors affect intelligence is perhaps incorrect because it hasn’t taken into account genetic transmission,” study author Kevin Beaver, a criminology professor at FSU, said in a press release.

Some studies suggest that parents who interact with their kids over family dinners or by reading them bedtimes stories can boost their children’s IQ, while other research suggests that children’s IQs are only a product of their genetics.

Analyzing children who shared no DNA with their adoptive parents eliminated the possibility that parental socialization influenced a child’s intelligence.

“In previous research, it looks as though parenting is having an effect on child intelligence, but in reality the parents who are more intelligent are doing these things and it is masking the genetic transformation of intelligence to their children,” Beaver said.

Beaver noted that the findings don’t suggest that parents shouldn’t engage with their children, but rather that parents don’t have to go to extremes to influence their offspring.

“The way you parent a child is not going to have a detectable effect on their IQ as long as that parenting is within normal bounds,” Beaver said.

The study is published in the November-December 2014 issue of the journal Intelligence.
 

How Sway?

Great Value Man
Supporter
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
25,290
Reputation
4,340
Daps
82,882
Reppin
NULL
IQ test are BS IMO.

And this is coming from someone who scored above the 95th percentile...
 
  • Dap
Reactions: IVS

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,084
Daps
7,068
Reppin
NULL
I believe it's a little both..nurture and nature..
Even with "nature" it's still "nurture" when speaking on intelligence. What I mean is you are not "naturally" intelligent, if that was the case people who are smart in school, and seem to be intelligent will stay that way throughout their life but, i have seen that to not be the case. The older they get, the more stuck they become.

I feel intelligence is using the things you learn, and being able to condense this knowledge into simple ways that benefit you in life. To do this you need a brain with strong connections, and you get this through physical work, mental work, and diet. The diet part helps you keep the brain from breaking down from too much strees, and the free radicals it creates, as well as provide the nutrients to allow for fast communication such as fats for a strong myelin sheath. If parents eat properly, and do the physical/mental work, THEN the child has a higher chance of being "naturally" intelligent. But, it won't last if the child doesn't continue to do what he's supposed to do to maintain that intelligence or let it grow.
 

Goat poster

KANG LIFE
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
20,692
Reputation
3,984
Daps
90,722
Wat good is intelligence that isnt fostered or cultivated for the kid to capitalize on tho.........................

Might not be able to make a kid smarter, but u can still equip them with the tools they need to succeed and be a self-sufficient adult

THIS!!!

There are many cases of people with high IQ's but come from a poor background where it isn't fostered.

The book Outliers points to the story of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Langan

This dude is one of the smartest men EVER according to IQ test, yet since he grew up dirt poor in Montana and dropped out of 2 colleges cause he couldn't afford it he can't find anybody to publish or support his work on an academic level.

I'd be willing to bet it's HELLA black kids in many hoods in the USA that have a similar story.
 

Liu Kang

KING KILLAYAN MBRRRAPPÉ
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
14,085
Reputation
5,584
Daps
30,997
:yeshrug: call it what you want

I still dont think it means anything
I agree with you.
Intelligence as IQ tests measure it seems to be based on how fast one's think or process things as if the brain was a calculator. But it doesn't seem to measure one's education, knowledge or sociability which are also important factors in a child's growth.

Regarding the article, the actual study seems to be more about refuting that the parents involvement (bedtime stories, helping kids do their homework etc.) should somehow "increase" a kid's intelligence. Intelligence being mainly genetics' based doesn't strike me as an absurd thought, I find it quite logical in fact. To me, intelligence is like talent : innate. But having it doesn't mean anything in the end if you don't know how to use it and that is where the parents and teachers come to the rescue.
 

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,756
Daps
2,325
Even with "nature" it's still "nurture" when speaking on intelligence. What I mean is you are not "naturally" intelligent, if that was the case people who are smart in school, and seem to be intelligent will stay that way throughout their life but, i have seen that to not be the case. The older they get, the more stuck they become.

I feel intelligence is using the things you learn, and being able to condense this knowledge into simple ways that benefit you in life. To do this you need a brain with strong connections, and you get this through physical work, mental work, and diet. The diet part helps you keep the brain from breaking down from too much strees, and the free radicals it creates, as well as provide the nutrients to allow for fast communication such as fats for a strong myelin sheath. If parents eat properly, and do the physical/mental work, THEN the child has a higher chance of being "naturally" intelligent. But, it won't last if the child doesn't continue to do what he's supposed to do to maintain that intelligence or let it grow.


There is truth to this. Another study was conducted using the same data (may have been the same study IIRC), and they found a significant correlation between academic achievement and birth weight.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/upshot/heavier-babies-do-better-in-school.html?_r=0&abt=0002&abg=1

Yet within every group the researchers studied, birth weight appeared to have a noticeable effect, even after controlling for a long list of other factors. Mr. Figlio estimates that, all else equal, a 10-pound baby will score an average of 80 points higher on the 1,600-point SAT than a six-pound baby. Another way to see the pattern is to look only at top-scoring students: Among the top 5 percent of test scorers in elementary school, one in three weighed at least eight pounds at birth, compared with only one in four of all babies.


I think the strongest factors in someone's life outcome, are, and these are ranked by importance 1) genetics (billions of genes that set the foundation) 2) prenatal environment (did mom eat the right food or take bad drugs) 3) diseases (viral infections, brain altering pathogens) 4) Peer group (Neighborhood friends to cultural identity).

I don't think how a kid is raised, by his parents, makes that much of a difference. Not as much as the Kid's friends, and the Kid's prenatal nutrition.

Being smart and having fast brain processing is one thing. Having impulse control and being conscientious is another thing entirely. Being an extrovert or introvert is also very important to determining one's life.


Everyone always recites some anecdote like,"Well I know so and so with an IQ of 140+ and look at them". The long-term aggregate data has shown, time and time again, that IQ matters, and it matters a whole lot.
 
Top