give this mod a snickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kritic

Kritic

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
8,937
Reputation
495
Daps
5,892
Reppin
NULL
ndoq3
 
C

cook

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
0
Reputation
11,287
Daps
48,012
Enough man. You blew my pm box up and i told you it wasnt a problem and now you do this...its very clear in our rule section your not to repost pms from mods.
 
Digga38

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,280
Daps
7,987
Reppin
Dub-C
cook said:
Enough man. You blew my pm box up and i told you it wasnt a problem and now you do this...its very clear in our rule section your not to repost pms from mods.
Click to expand...

mods cant stand by they own words?
 
C

cook

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
0
Reputation
11,287
Daps
48,012
Digga38 said:
mods cant stand by they own words?
Click to expand...

it has nothing to do with standing by their own words. if we wanted to hold a discussion for every infractions we give then we'd post them publicly ourselves. when i give someone an infraction, its a courtesy to try and prevent that member from getting banned...if we let members post those infractions in an attempt to show us up and create friction then id just say fukk it and ban people instead of giving them a warning. this particular case is a perfect example, he received an infraction and came to me about it which was what he should do. i let him know that i wasn't concerned about the infraction and instead of letting it go and everything being fine, he decides to make a thread like this to disrespect a mod who, right or wrong was just trying to do their job. we put up with much more disrespect than probably any other board on the internet, this is one of the few rules we have to protect ourselves. i rarely, if ever put a members business out there. we'd appreciate it if members didnt do it to us
 
Digga38

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,280
Daps
7,987
Reppin
Dub-C
cook said:
it has nothing to do with standing by their own words. if we wanted to hold a discussion for every infractions we give then we'd post them publicly ourselves. when i give someone an infraction, its a courtesy to try and prevent that member from getting banned...if we let members post those infractions in an attempt to show us up and create friction then id just say fukk it and ban people instead of giving them a warning. this particular case is a perfect example, he received an infraction and came to me about it which was what he should do. i let him know that i wasn't concerned about the infraction and instead of letting it go and everything being fine, he decides to make a thread like this to disrespect a mod who, right or wrong was just trying to do their job. we put up with much more disrespect than probably any other board on the internet, this is one of the few rules we have to protect ourselves. i rarely, if ever put a members business out there. we'd appreciate it if members didnt do it to us
Click to expand...
mod is incapable and biased doing their 'job'

this sig wasnt ban worthy in the fukkin 1st place
 
C

cook

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
0
Reputation
11,287
Daps
48,012
Digga38 said:
mod is incapable and biased doing their 'job'

this sig wasnt ban worthy in the fukkin 1st place
Click to expand...

Which is why I fukking told him it was fine

Edit: this is the exact reason we have that rule. Here I am wasting my fukking time discussing a meaningless infraction with you :snoop:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top