Gov. Gavin Newsom proposes 28th Amendment for gun control

the elastic

livin' outside of the matrix
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
17,586
Reputation
7,521
Daps
79,265
Reppin
the bay/norcal

Governor Gavin Newsom proposed a 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution to enshrine fundamental, broadly supported gun safety measures into law. While leaving the 2nd Amendment unchanged and respecting America’s gun-owning tradition, the Governor’s proposal guarantees common sense constitutional protections and gun safety measures that Democrats, Republicans, independent voters, and gun owners overwhelmingly support – including universal background checks, raising the firearm purchase age to 21, instituting a firearm purchase waiting period, and barring the civilian purchase of assault weapons.

“Our ability to make a more perfect union is literally written into the Constitution,” said Governor Gavin Newsom. “So today, I’m proposing the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution to do just that. The 28th Amendment will enshrine in the Constitution common sense gun safety measures that Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and gun owners overwhelmingly support – while leaving the 2nd Amendment unchanged and respecting America’s gun-owning tradition.”

The 28th Amendment will permanently enshrine four broadly supported gun safety principles into the U.S. Constitution:

  • Raising the federal minimum age to purchase a firearm from 18 to 21;
  • Mandating universal background checks to prevent truly dangerous people from purchasing a gun that could be used in a crime;
  • Instituting a reasonable waiting period for all gun purchases; and
  • Barring civilian purchase of assault weapons that serve no other purpose than to kill as many people as possible in a short amount of time – weapons of war our nation’s founders never foresaw.
Additionally, the 28th Amendment will affirm Congress, states, and local governments can enact additional common-sense gun safety regulations that save lives.

Passage of the 28th Amendment will require a convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, also known as an Article V Convention or amendatory convention. Working in partnership with members of the California State Senate and Assembly, California will be the first state in the nation to call for such a convention with a joint resolution being introduced by California State Senator Aisha Wahab and Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer. The Governor will work with grassroots supporters, elected and civic leaders, and broad and diverse coalitions across the nation to fight for the passage of similar resolutions in other state legislatures to ensure the convening of a constitutional convention limited to this subject. 33 other states, in addition to California, would need to take action to convene such a convention.

:jbhmm:
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
23,583
Reputation
13,271
Daps
136,592
If he intends to run for president some day that would hurt him. That's a non starter in red states. The right to gun down as many of your fellow citizens(and their children) you can is something a lot of Americans are willing to kill and die for.

You can expect 'back the blue' types to turn overnight if police are now empowered to confiscate their AR 15s and modified pistols.

He's better off proposing an ammendment that clarifies that the right to bear arms is not an individual right, but the right of a militia or state police/guard. That is the intent of the legislation, its to make sure a colony could defend itself if attacked, not for a maniac to amass as much arms as possible to murder everyone who looks at him the wrong way. What we have currently is a radical interpretation and not a conservative interpretation of what is written in the document.
 

the elastic

livin' outside of the matrix
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
17,586
Reputation
7,521
Daps
79,265
Reppin
the bay/norcal
If he intends to run for president some day that would hurt him. That's a non starter in red states. The right to gun down as many of your fellow citizens(and their children) you can is something a lot of Americans are willing to kill for.

You can expect 'back the blue' types to turn overnight if police are now empowered to confiscate their AR 15s and modified pistols.
It would hurt him with single-issue gun voters and certain independent voters, but I don't think it would be as devastating as one would assume. It's all about how he sells it and how bad he can make the opponents of sensible gun control look to the average American. If he can get permission from school shooting parents to show autopsy pics, I can wager that a sizable amount of people can be moved.
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
23,583
Reputation
13,271
Daps
136,592
It would hurt him with single-issue gun voters and certain independent voters, but I don't think it would be as devastating as one would assume. It's all about how he sells it and how bad he can make the opponents of sensible gun control look to the average American. If he can get permission from school shooting parents to show autopsy pics, I can wager that a sizable amount of people can be moved.
I hope I'm wrong but the gun debate in America is settled. Once other states refused to push for tighter legislation after elementary school kids were killed it was obvious where the American people stand on gun violence. The Newtown murders marked the end of the gun debate because Americans as a whole decided that they don't care if kids are killed. If you don't give a shyt if a 5 year old is shot in the face, you won't care about preventing anyone else getting hurt.
 

the elastic

livin' outside of the matrix
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
17,586
Reputation
7,521
Daps
79,265
Reppin
the bay/norcal
I hope I'm wrong but the gun debate in America is settled. Once other states refused to push for tighter legislation after elementary school kids were killed it was obvious where the American people stand on gun violence. The Newtown murders marked the end of the gun debate because Americans as a whole decided that they don't care if kids are killed. If you don't give a shyt if a 5 year old is shot in the face, you won't care about preventing anyone else getting hurt.
Dems gotta take the Till approach. Show em exactly what the aftermath of unchecked gun control does. You think that approach would have made a difference for Newtown?
 

Sir Richard Spirit

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
7,431
Reputation
1,262
Daps
23,345
This is how you suppose to run for president. I don’t agree with half the shyt he says, but I respect the fresh idea. It may not be new, but it’s definitely not something thrown out there often.

Wish him well out there. He stay away from the scandals he’ll be president one day.
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
44,511
Reputation
9,799
Daps
108,088
Unless the government is really about to tell Americans "We are coming to take your assault rifles:ufdup:". They are better off saying nothing at all.
 

Yapdatfool

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
8,822
Reputation
1,356
Daps
23,370
Reppin
NULL
Does he know how difficult doing anything with amendments in this political climate even is?
 

King Jove

King Of †he Gawds
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
33,693
Reputation
10,815
Daps
206,176
Reppin
[redacted]
Nothing more than political theater. Has absolutely no chance in passing and he knows it.

If you want to raise the age to purchase a gun, then also raise the age to join the military or get drafted. If a 18-20 year old is too immature to buy a gun, then they are too immature to die for warmongering politicians as well.

Universal background checks are fine.

They have to define what is a "reasonable waiting period". Vague language like this is not transparent.

WTF is an "assault weapon"? Real assault weapons are barred from most civilians. The only real assault weapons are the ones the government is giving to white people in Ukraine with my tax dollars. And how does it even fix the problem? Most gun violence in this country is with non-"assault weapons". Are they gonna ban "assault weapons" from white supremacist race soldiers in badges that use them on black people as well?
 
Last edited:

BobbyWojak

Superstar
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Messages
8,402
Reputation
1,672
Daps
29,190
Barring civilian purchase of assault weapons that serve no other purpose than to kill as many people as possible in a short amount of time – weapons of war our nation’s founders never foresaw.

He needs to drop this part :snoop:
 
Top