NYT should come out of this looking the worst. They can't even transcribe a podcast?Take back what I said earlier about Hillary.
Gabbard looking even more funny in the light but also the NY Times is also looking really goofy.

NYT should come out of this looking the worst. They can't even transcribe a podcast?Take back what I said earlier about Hillary.
Gabbard looking even more funny in the light but also the NY Times is also looking really goofy.


I suppose there isn't much of a difference these days....
Anyways you would think Gabbard or team would've listened to the podcast first before releasing a statement and repeatedly doubling down
Consciousness of guilt or continuing her role of disrupting the election? She's already repeatedly attacked the DNC, saying the media and polls are rigged...
Maybe she is an asset and or being groomed she sure plays the part
![]()
Everything you said can be applied to Christianity as well is my point. You're argument is pathetic, religious persecution isn't the move B.So, you've run outta gas? Pathetic as usual.
It is weird how she never goes after Biden. She went after Harris *hard* over her attack on Biden. So odd for an anti-war peacenik.
So all that Russia shyt is now uh nevermind?I suppose there isn't much of a difference these days....
Anyways you would think Gabbard or team would've listened to the podcast first before releasing a statement and repeatedly doubling down
Consciousness of guilt or continuing her role of disrupting the election? She's already repeatedly attacked the DNC, saying the media and polls are rigged...
Maybe she is an asset and or being groomed she sure plays the part
![]()

Too bad it was mostly lies and uninformed bullshyt.I know most progressives are defensing Tulsi but I’m sorry but Hillary g-checked that bytch for her crypto-Republican bullshyt.
Now when she starts doing her usual bullshyt: threatening to boycott the debates, juelzing in defense of Russian hacking, doing “both sides,” etc. it’s already in the air. Shrewd political move...probably the only good thing since she’s done since she lost to the orange ape.
Now she can go back to woods and stfu. Tulsi will be on RT in a year. fukk both of them...mildly entertaining spat.
I know. I watch some RT. I didn’t say being on there makes someone an asset. Just that I think she will be up there a lot after she loses her primary a year from now. Unless Putin gives her the assistToo bad it was mostly lies and uninformed bullshyt.
Larry King and Chris Hedges are currently on RT, and Ed Shultz was before he passed away. I guess they are Russian or Republican assets to, whichever is the narrative today. lol

Maybe the rest of the House can sign her Protect Our Elections Act before that helping it get some traction with the Senate and President making Putin's help impossible.I know. I watch some RT. I didn’t say being on there makes someone an asset. Just that I think she will be up there a lot in a year after she loses her primary a year from now. Unless Putin gives her the assist![]()

Yes she has proven she isn't as smart as she would like us to believe.it shows the ineptitude of the candidate tulsi.
So all that Russia shyt is now uh nevermind?![]()

So all that Russia shyt is now uh nevermind?![]()
Always follow the money. 1st it's ads. And we know that's already happening. Next it'll be donors.
I'm not going as far as to say she's a Russian asset, patsy, or proxy. I'm simply saying the Russians are backing her even though she didn't ask for it.
Honestly, I think she's a reverse Warren. Whereas Warren went from GOP to Dem. Tulsi is going from Dem to GOP. And Russia is taking full advantage of that.


Wake me up when she is officially a Republican. lol @ acting like you said something profound when it hasn't happened.

Wake me up when she is officially a Republican. lol @ acting like you said something profound when it hasn't happened.![]()

