Hillary Clinton says Republicans are grooming Tulsi Gabbard for a 3rd party run (edit: not Russians)

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
33,258
Reputation
3,903
Daps
77,518
Reppin
New York
That's y'all's move? To equate repeating actual facts from Fox's news coverage with posting lies from racist right-wing bloggers? That's really the best you have to offer?

Claim they don't have time to factcheck the lies they circulate but they do have time to keep my name in their mouth for calling them out on it. :snoop:
Uh it's an article with quotes from anonymous sources. That passes the test of responsible journalism for you?
Why are you acting like fact-checking an article takes the same effort as typing your screen name on a message board? One takes seconds the other a good amount of minutes at least if done properly. Don't be disingenuous.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,101
Reppin
the ether
Uh it's an article with quotes from anonymous sources. That passes the test of responsible journalism for you?
Why are you acting like fact-checking an article takes the same effort as typing your screen name on a message board? One takes seconds the other a good amount of minutes at least if done properly. Don't be disingenuous.
Anonymous sources HAVE to be used as some points or you don't have much journalism at all. You pass the test of responsible journalism with accountability and a track record. If you think Tim Pool has the same accountability and track record that is required of mainstream journalists than you're showing your ass.

Every single time I have spoken on Tulsi you have waded into an online defense of her and counter my point. Every time. But a right-wing poster notorious for repeating disingenuous and racist sources posted a tweet from a source that we've called out before for being an untrustworthy bigot, and you didn't have time to check that shyt?

Don't blame me, you did it.



She met with Wall St. people and a Democratic strategist who used to work for Obama. Hillary said either Russians or Republicans were 'grooming' her. And she hasn't announced any third party run yet.
What do you mean, "either"? The interview has been posted and once you know to pay attention to where the error was made then it's not in question anymore. She was asked about the Republicans and responded with "they", the Russians weren't even mentioned until later in the answer.


Since you seem to want to roll with her no matter what she does, can we get you on the record ahead of time? If at any point she states that she is running third-party, is thinking about running third-party, or believes that running third-party would be a good idea, what will you have to say about her?
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
33,258
Reputation
3,903
Daps
77,518
Reppin
New York
Anonymous sources HAVE to be used as some points or you don't have much journalism at all. You pass the test of responsible journalism with accountability and a track record. If you think Tim Pool has the same accountability and track record that is required of mainstream journalists than you're showing your ass.

Every single time I have spoken on Tulsi you have waded into an online defense of her and counter my point. Every time. But a right-wing poster notorious for repeating disingenuous and racist sources posted a tweet from a source that we've called out before for being an untrustworthy bigot, and you didn't have time to check that shyt?

Don't blame me, you did it.




What do you mean, "either"? The interview has been posted and once you know to pay attention to where the error was made then it's not in question anymore. She was asked about the Republicans and responded with "they", the Russians weren't even mentioned until later in the answer.


Since you seem to want to roll with her no matter what she does, can we get you on the record ahead of time? If at any point she states that she is running third-party, is thinking about running third-party, or believes that running third-party would be a good idea, what will you have to say about her?
Dude it wasn't that deep to me. I barely know who Tim Poole is, I'm really not paying attention to him at all. I saw and read the post and took the information at face value. If he is wrong, I was misinformed.
I'm just being fecitious and pointing out they to published misinformation just like Mr. Poole.
It's a free country/democracy she can do whatever she wants. I will definitely not be voting for her if Bernie, Liz or Yang are the nominee. And if Biden or anyone else is the nominee I might consider it but will still likely vote the Democratic nominee.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,048
Daps
132,808
She met with Wall St. people and a Democratic strategist who used to work for Obama. Hillary said either Russians or Republicans were 'grooming' her. And she hasn't announced any third party run yet.
So why do you think she’s not running for Congress re-election? :sas1:

Why’d she just announce it, and why hasn’t she be raising money for it this whole time? :sas2:

Why has she backed off M4A and is moving to the right on policy matters recently? :sas1:

Why is she making up these dumb fake reasons to threaten a boycott of the DNC? :sas2:

Why did she randomly say she doesn’t believe anyone is “deplorable” at the last debate? :sas1:

Why did she decry identity politics unprompted in the debates :sas2:

Why does she run to Tucker Carlson and Fox News every time she wants to bash Dems? :sas1:

Why has she tried to play the role of hatchet woman in every Democratic debate :sas2:

Why is she always an apologist for Trump on Russia now Ukraine/impeachment? :sas1:

Why’d she just randomly have a meeting with Scaramucci and a bunch of wall street donors? :sas2:

You probably think all of that is because she’s a principled independent thinker :mjlol:
 
Top