How high do you put looks on the relationship requirements rubric?
- Thread starter yardman
- Start date
There has to be some kind of attraction. Why get in a relationship with somebody you have no attraction to.
For me if I am sexually attracted to her and I can walk with her in public and be proud/happy in her company, that is high in priority. Yes personality is important but there has to be balance. Of course you can't just partner with a pretty face alone.
For me if I am sexually attracted to her and I can walk with her in public and be proud/happy in her company, that is high in priority. Yes personality is important but there has to be balance. Of course you can't just partner with a pretty face alone.
Armchair Militant
Stay woke
Very high
NOSaintsFan02
Superstar
Very high but its not my be all end all.
My ex I think was stunning in the face. But damn she was a bytch. Took me awhile but I finally realized I needed to let go for my (our) sanity and true happiness.
My new girl I'm very attracted to. She may not catch a person's eye like my ex does but damn if she isn't the sweetest girl and being with her makes me realize just now important attitude and compatibility is in a relationship.
My ex I think was stunning in the face. But damn she was a bytch. Took me awhile but I finally realized I needed to let go for my (our) sanity and true happiness.
My new girl I'm very attracted to. She may not catch a person's eye like my ex does but damn if she isn't the sweetest girl and being with her makes me realize just now important attitude and compatibility is in a relationship.
That question can be interpreted side ways 
...I have to be attracted to her yes.
But there is a wide range of looks that I call attractive. 
Like below, some are more / less attractive than the others but I find all of them in the range of what I generally find attractive. That said it's not a hierarchy of traits, there just are set of things that have to fit. If they fit we good, there is no order...
...I have to be attracted to her yes. But there is a wide range of looks that I call attractive. Like below, some are more / less attractive than the others but I find all of them in the range of what I generally find attractive. That said it's not a hierarchy of traits, there just are set of things that have to fit. If they fit we good, there is no order...
SheWantTheD
Veteran
They all look the same brehThat question can be interpreted side ways
Like below, some are more / less attractive than the others but I find all of them in the range of what I generally find attractive. That said it's not a hierarchy of traits, there just are set of things that have to fit. If they fit we good, there is no order...
Id take a chance on all these girlsThat question can be interpreted side ways
Like below, some are more / less attractive than the others but I find all of them in the range of what I generally find attractive. That said it's not a hierarchy of traits, there just are set of things that have to fit. If they fit we good, there is no order...
Piff Perkins
Veteran
It's not the highest rank. I'd put personality far above looks. Do we gel together, can we have fun doing nothing as well as when we're out on the town, can I trust her, etc. Also I'd put intelligence higher. Not talking about book smarts (although that matters to a certain degree), I'm talking about...is she smart enough not to be heavily in debt, does she handle money well, can I trust her to make good decisions, is she curious intellectually (which partially boils down to her not being religious), etc.
Looks are important as well obviously. You can't deny that being attracted to someone matters. But there are more important things to consider, especially if it's a potentially serious relationship...
Looks are important as well obviously. You can't deny that being attracted to someone matters. But there are more important things to consider, especially if it's a potentially serious relationship...
I think I value looks alot.
But I find most black women attractive.
If you take care of yourself and you're black, you probably look at the very least decent.
I don't think i have low standards, I just think black women look amazing... no simp.
I mean seriously tho, I think its hard to find an ugly in-shape black woman.
But I find most black women attractive.
If you take care of yourself and you're black, you probably look at the very least decent.
I don't think i have low standards, I just think black women look amazing... no simp
.I mean seriously tho, I think its hard to find an ugly in-shape black woman.
I value looks way more than I'm comfortable with.
...I want to at least be attracted to her, geez...otherwise, I'm gonna cheat on her...It's so shallow, but that's just what it is. I can't move forward with a woman I think is ugly..
...I want to at least be attracted to her, geez...otherwise, I'm gonna cheat on her...It's so shallow, but that's just what it is. I can't move forward with a woman I think is ugly..
R.E.N. Spells Ren
Veteran
Looks mean everything, then nothing at all.
I must be attracted to her in order to be in a relationship with her. But beyond that, it doesn't matter. So I wouldn't throw a 7 in the bushes for a dime simply cuz she looks better, but I wouldn't date a sub-5 at all, no matter how positive her other attributes are.
I must be attracted to her in order to be in a relationship with her. But beyond that, it doesn't matter. So I wouldn't throw a 7 in the bushes for a dime simply cuz she looks better, but I wouldn't date a sub-5 at all, no matter how positive her other attributes are.
LeftCoast
All Star
my only requirements is a fat ass and not be obese, I can work around errything else.
Personally I don't feel most men are all that picky, if she can pass a basic "is she attractive?" test she in ....I mean nikkas be talkn bout "paper bagging" chicks and shyt so 