KinksandCoils
African American Queen
Every race kills their own. The media just tries to make it seem like we are the only ones that do it.
How is the "What about black on black crime" argument invalid?
- Thread starter The Realist Perspective
- Start date
Because most crime is intraracial
Hopeofmypeople
Veteran
True and Cacs have committed the most heinous crimes in history, just browse around some of the things these Cacs do are darn right devilish.
KinksandCoils
African American Queen
Oh trust me I know
OG Talk
Archived
Its not about crime at all.. Its how about the justice system chooses to deal with criminals...
Every time someone tries to switch the conversation to Black on Black crime, just point them into the direction of justice (or lack of) and not the actual criminal act...
Every time someone tries to switch the conversation to Black on Black crime, just point them into the direction of justice (or lack of) and not the actual criminal act...
daboywonder2002
Superstar
i would like to be educated on this as well. but the difference i see is that whites are protected by the system. but blacks arent given a fair shot. look at zimmerman, look at darren wilson. now from what i see, it seems like we as blacks dont react the same when its black on black crime compared to white on black. we dont riot or retaliate when it's black on black crime. then you have the no snitching rule. of course not everybody follows it but you still have some people that keep their mouth shut. Basically when its black on black crime, there's no need to riot or retaliate because the system is gonna put the black man in jail. When its white on black crime, the system protects the white man so we have to put matters into our own hands
StretfordRed
Afro-European
I wouldn't bother with these dense "people" in this part of the forum
TheGoldCoast
Banned
USSInsiders
Banned
True...it can be used as somewhat of a deflecting tactic but...it is still a very valid point being made. If every black life is precious...who cares who takes the life? Shouldn't we all be equally outraged that a black life has been extinguished? From a black man in casual clothes killing another black man over "beef" to a white man in a police uniform killing a black man over "breaking the law" what's the difference?
Discuss. I really want to see if people can make any bit of sense out of this without negging me, calling me a cac or c00n. I'm sure I'll be disappointed though.
Here's why: because these communities where it's so prevalent were created by a predominantly white society with a power structure bent on keeping minorities disenfranchised and segregated from the rest of society. The black on black violence argument is rooted in the fact that blacks or other minorities are somehow inherently violent. But here's the thing, humans as a whole are inherently violent. It's just an implication that some of us are more violent than others from the sake of complexion alone. A lot of white people truly believe that.
If these communities had the same educational opportunities and quality of life as other places, there's no surprise the violence wouldn't be as bad as it is.
Drugs were purposely pushed into these neighborhoods by the government. The government purposely keeps the land values down so when they knock down these shytty neighborhoods, they can knock down the old housing and build luxury housing/apartments and make profits back 100-fold while keeping their risk virtually non-existent. The poor with no place to go lived in these neighborhoods after migrating from the poor south and elsewhere.
Are there people living in these communities with the power to make a change? Absolutely, but the government did a great job of fukking most of these places up to where they're almost brainwashed from day one that they aren't shyt, and they're never going to be shyt. Drugs and lack of economic opportunities led to people devaluing education so you have an endless cycle of violence and ignorance. The government has an underclass from which they have a permanent supply of soldiers and unskilled workers to perform menial labor. They have a justification to perpetuate the drug war and fund law enforcement.
Aside from all of that, it's simply a red herring. How do confirmed and alleged actions by a white power structure against minorities have anything to do with black on black crime? Easy answer: it doesn't unless you wanna talk about how white people have ravaged and segregated all sorts of minorities for decades upon decades with the intent of weakening them.
Max Goonberg
Superstar
When blacks kill blacks, if they are caught they go to jail.
When whites kill blacks they usually never even sniff jail.
They get the benefit of the doubt while the media demonizes the black victim
To justify his murder. The jury is usually made up of people who share the same
Views and "fears" as the defendant. Trial usually held in a majority white town.the white defendant Wins the case and Lives happily ever after. Rinse and repeat.
When whites kill blacks they usually never even sniff jail.
They get the benefit of the doubt while the media demonizes the black victim
To justify his murder. The jury is usually made up of people who share the same
Views and "fears" as the defendant. Trial usually held in a majority white town.the white defendant Wins the case and Lives happily ever after. Rinse and repeat.
OG_StankBrefs
Da Spice...
Whenever I hear dese ignorant black folks, especially young adults, bring dis silly ass bullshyt argument up I immediately 
And its always conveniently used da most whenever a racially charged murders like Trayvon Martin,etc. happens. fukkin idiots have no clue dey're adopting dese white folks' tactics.
And its always conveniently used da most whenever a racially charged murders like Trayvon Martin,etc. happens. fukkin idiots have no clue dey're adopting dese white folks' tactics.