Replace him with a above average-all star SF we are.. We did play well when Paul was out with his shoulder injury. Blake beasted![]()
^^And this is a Paul stan telling yall this. Keep believing what ESPN and PER is telling you.
Replace him with a above average-all star SF we are.. We did play well when Paul was out with his shoulder injury. Blake beasted![]()
Blake stan actually^^And this is a Paul stan telling yall this. Keep believing what ESPN and PER is telling you.


at Chris Paul being anywhere near Jason Kidd

Didn't make it before him either. Notice his uptick in points from 6.2 to 17.1 during Paul's rookie season.He got older and had an injury. His highest point per game with Chris was 21. He avg 17 at age 32 without Chris. You think if he was younger he couldnt average 20 per game without him?

Didn't make it before him either. Notice his uptick in points from 6.2 to 17.1 during Paul's rookie season.![]()

The b. b b he never had a jumpshot/he played in the weak east crowd is hilarious. As if the players surrounding him where about shyt. Kidd lost to the 04 pistons/-3 spurs and 02 Lakers in his prime. Has any team Chris Paul lost to equal those squads? Ill wait![]()
Then you have to be honest and admit Steve Nash was just as good at running a squad but with a better overall offensive game, just no defense.
As I stated already, Kidd and Nash, while they were fun to watch in their primes, had major deficiencies that Chris Paul does not have.
. Kidd hit his shots when they needed to. He wasnt beating the three teams I mentioned regardless even though he had a chance vs the Pistons. Meanwhile Chris is so great he cant beat a team like Memphis?It doesnt matter about major deficiencies when the job gets done, thats what you nikkas dont understand. Chris Paul can do everything so well except WIN.. Kidd hit his shots when they needed to. He wasnt beating the three teams I mentioned regardless even though he had a chance vs the Pistons. Meanwhile Chris is so great he cant beat a team like Memphis?