How much money would you need to just straight up take over a poor country?

CarbonBraddock

You will be trolled
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
17,171
Reputation
8,198
Daps
80,824
Like remove the people in power and put yourself in there? I feel like it would be a lot, like at least a billion dollars, but it may not take that much since this is a poor country after all. At the same time, you do have to buy guns, ammo, and all that shyt. Here is how i think it would go, you form a PMC and go over there and tear shyt up, which shouldn't be too hard. Discuss.
 

Logmanjames

All Star
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
807
Reputation
160
Daps
3,042
Money in this case would be secondary to power IMO. Not that they're mutually exclusive, but knowing the right people, running a propaganda machine would go a lot better
 

Nemesis

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,397
Reputation
2,361
Daps
25,405
Reppin
NULL
Like remove the people in power and put yourself in there? I feel like it would be a lot, like at least a billion dollars, but it may not take that much since this is a poor country after all. At the same time, you do have to buy guns, ammo, and all that shyt. Here is how i think it would go, you form a PMC and go over there and tear shyt up, which shouldn't be too hard. Discuss.


a billion wont cut it ....... every country you can think of has GDP in at least the tens of billions.......

you could only do it with the help of an insider i.e someone in the armed forces , via a military coup, without that your fukked.... and even if you do that if its not a popular uprising youre fukked, the people will come out against you....

if you are not a native of the country you are invading you are fukked, you wont be accepted by anyone.......be ready to face charges plus a UN peacekeeping force
 

CarbonBraddock

You will be trolled
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
17,171
Reputation
8,198
Daps
80,824
The propoganda game would be much more important than money

why? you would need the money to do anything even from the start. if you go to a really poor country and start improving shyt, that would be incredible propaganda to begin with.
 

Logmanjames

All Star
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
807
Reputation
160
Daps
3,042
the money wouldn't get you the power?
It could, which is why I said that they're not mutually exclusive. It's just that I feel power is the only necessity, money would be a means to that end. I'd imagine even if you needed money the connections you'd gain with power could account for that. It's just a matter of which one you start with i suppose, and I'd rather start with power
 

CarbonBraddock

You will be trolled
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
17,171
Reputation
8,198
Daps
80,824
a billion wont cut it ....... every country you can think of has GDP in at least the tens of billions.......

you could only do it with the help of an insider i.e someone in the armed forces , via a military coup, without that your fukked.... and even if you do that if its not a popular uprising youre fukked, the people will come out against you....

if you are not a native of the country you are invading you are fukked, you wont be accepted by anyone.......be ready to face charges plus a UN peacekeeping force
if u could get the insider, why would it not be popular if you are doing shyt to help poor people?
 

Nemesis

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,397
Reputation
2,361
Daps
25,405
Reppin
NULL
if u could get the insider, why would it not be popular if you are doing shyt to help poor people?


because in order to stay in power you would have to keep a percentage of the people happy, every dictator you can think of has supporters if not they wouldnt last a week,

plus if you are a foreigner you would get murked even before you started
 
Top