How white backed unions used licensing to kill black barbershops.

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,333
Daps
89,592
How Unions Used Licensing to Crush Ethnic Barbershops

How Unions Used Licensing to Crush Ethnic Barbershops
barber.PNG


12/21/2016
Ryan McMaken

For far too long, historians who wrote on inter-racial and inter-ethnic relations focused almost exclusively on the victimization of various groups while ignoring the entrepreneurship and mutual aid that took place within those same ethnic groups.

Fortunately, the situation has been changing in recent decades. In my article "The Trouble With Public Accommodation," for example, I looked at how some relatively recent scholarship has chronicled the economic importance of ethnic enclaves and small business development in increasing entrepreneurship among non-Anglo ethnic groups and among immigrant groups in general. Works of note on this topic include An American Story: Mexican American Entrepreneurship and Wealth Creation by Mary Ann Villarreal, and a collection of essays called Landscapes of the Ethnic Economy.

Now, a new book by Douglas Bristol examines how barbershops became an economic fixture for black business owners and black entrepreneurs during the 19th-century, both before and after the Civil War. Bristol's book, Knights of the Razor: Black Barbers in Slavery and Freedom, examines not only how barber shops formed both a social and economic function within the black community, but also how barbers were able to build barbershop-based capital into other ventures such as insurance firms.

As with so many businesses founded by Japanese-American and Mexican-American entrepreneurs, many black-owned barbershops (and the other businesses they spawned) were founded to fill a need in the face of legal and social barriers to economic advancement, such as anti-Japanese and anti-Mexican laws in California and Texas, respectively.

Bristol also notes how barbering assisted established black business shop owners in mentoring and training younger men who would go on to build businesses of their own.

Bristol notes, however, that after the Civil War German immigrants used political influence through labor unions to lobby and win government regulation of barbershops through licensing.

By the 1880s, new barbering schools had led to an influx of new barbers who, as Bristol explains "drove down prices for shaves and haircuts." There was still no shortage of the so-called "first-class" barbershops where higher prices could be had, but new young barbers were providing more low-cost options to lower-income customers.

In the minds of interventionism-minded barbers, of course, this had to be stopped. Fortunately for them, it was also at this time that reformers began to complain that barber shops were rife with disease and were a menace to public health.

Bristol explains how the first barber licensing laws soon followed. In this interview, Bristol notes:

There was a union, the Journeymen Barbers International Union of America which was associated with the American Federation of Labor. The leaders, mostly 2nd and 3rd generation German immigrants, saw their opportunity to seize on the issue of sanitation to limit competition, and while they're at it finally exclude blacks from the first-class barbershops. The pretext for the licensing laws was to ensure sanitation of barbershops and protect public health...They really traded on gross stereotypes about Italian-Americans or African-Americans being disease carriers... So starting in the 1880s, we see the first [licensing] laws being passed.​

In the decades that followed, advocates for marriage licenses, minimum wages, and controls on private ownership of weapons also capitalized on racial and ethnic stereotypes to increase government power. The state, of course, happily played along.

Bristol's full interview can be heard below:


========

If any of you want, I have a excellent book that documents white american attack on black businesses via regulatory measures like minimum wage and other various licensing programs.

Walter Williams called Race and Economics, it has a chapter documenting the process throughly and highly sourced. If you want it, PM me and I will send it to you.
 

JahFocus CS

Get It How You Get It
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
20,461
Reputation
3,755
Daps
82,445
Reppin
Republic of New Afrika
Interesting find. But although the history of these specific laws and campaigns may be interesting, you're clearly using this to try to push and reinforce anti-union and anti-working class rhetoric and misconceptions on here.
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,333
Daps
89,592
Interesting find. But although the history of these specific laws and campaigns may be interesting, you're clearly using this to try to push and reinforce anti-union and anti-working class rhetoric and misconceptions on here.
Unions are anti black americans in the US.
Like I said to Serious, if you want the Walter Williams book where he details the union policies to hurt blacks let me know.
I'll post a snippet of the chapter of the book.

Davis-Bacon Act
As can be seen from the congressional testimony of its supporters, the Davis-Bacon Act was aimed at decoupling that foothold. Said Representative Clayton Allgood, "Reference has been made to a contractor from Alabama who went to New York with bootleg labor. This is a fact. That contractor has
cheap colored labor that he transports, and he puts them in cabins, and it is labor of that sort that is in competition with white labor throughout the country. This bill has merit, and with the extensive building program now being entered into, it is very important that we enact this Representative John J. Cochran of Missouri voiced similar sentiments, saying he had "received numerous complaints in recent months about southern contractors employing low-paid colored mechanics getting work and bringing the employees from the South"19 William Green, president of the American Federation of Labor, made clear the unions' interests: "[C]olored labor is being sought to demoralize wage rates In addition to black workers, those of non-European descent were targeted. In 1927, Representative
Bacon entered in the Congressional Record a statement by thirty-four university professors concerning the new immigration law: "We urge the extension of the quota system to all countries of North and South America from which we have substantial migration and in which the population is
not predominantly of the white race.... Only by this method can that large proportion of our population which is descended from the colonists... have their proper racial representation....Congress wisely concluded that onlyby such a system of proportional representation ... could the racial status quo be​

Effects of Davis -Bacon Act
According to Vedder and Galloway, prior to the enactment of the Davis-Bacon Act, black and white construction unemployment registered similar levels. After the enactment of the Davis-Bacon Act, however, black unemployment rose relative to that of whites." Vedder and Galloway also argue that 1930 to 1950 was a period of unprecedented and rapidlyincreasing government intervention in the economy. This period saw enactment of the bulk of legislation restraining the setting of private wage, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act, Davis-Bacon Act, Walsh-Healey Act, and National Labor Relations Act. The Social Security Act also played a role, forcing employers to pay for a newly imposed fringe benefit.32 Vedder and Galloway also note that this period saw a rapid increase in the black/white unemployment ratio.​


Licensing blacks out of employment

In stark contrast to today, black leaders of the past were deeply suspicious about union motivation and recognized their harm and hostility to blacks. W. E. B. Dubois said, "nstead of taking the part of the Negro and helping him toward physical and economic freedom, the America labor movement from the beginning has tried to achieve freedom at the expense of the Negro." Later he added, "The white employers, North and South, literally gave the Negroes work when white men refused to work with him; when he's scabbed forbread and butter the employers defended him against mob violence of white laborers; they gave him educational institutions when white labor would have left him in ignorance."20 Said Marcus Garvey, in urging blacks to undercut union wages as a means to employment and combating union racism, "the only convenient friend the Negro worker or laborer has in America at the present time is the white capitalist."" Similarly, in 1924, Howard University's Professor Kelly Miller urged blacks to "stand shoulder to shoulder with the captains of industry" in opposition to labor unions.22 J. E. Bruce wrote that unions were a "greedy, grasping, ruthless, intolerant, overbearing, dictatorial combination of half-educated white men.... I am against them because they are against the Negro.23 Both Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washing ton were lifelong foes of ...


..
Black newspapers and the Urban League understood the economics of the conflict, and took a conciliatory posture towards Chicago's racist unions saying, "We have arrayed ourselves on the side of capital to a great extent; yet capital has not played square with us; it has used us as strikebreakers, then when the calm came turned us adrift." Adding that if it were to the race's "economic, social and political interest to join with organized labor now, it should not make the least bit of difference what was their attitude toward us in the past, even if that past was as recent as yesterday. If they extend the olive branch in good faith accept it today."35 Months later, after a convention of the American Federation of Labor (AFL), when its constituent unions did nothing to remove exclusion and segregation clauses, the Chicago Defender bitterly complained, "Unwillingly, we assume the role of strikebreakers. The unions drive us to it."36 Black workers put their antipathy toward unions more forcefully: "fukk the union, fukk you in the [union] button."​

...

Section 7a of the NRA certified unions as exclusive bargaining agents. The NAACP's Roy Wilkins said that the AFLs strategy was to use sec tion 7a "to organize a union for all workers, and to either agree with employers to push Negroes out of the industry or, having effected an agreement with the employer, proceed to make the union Black spokesmen and the black press were fully aware of the effects of the act. They referred to it variously as the "Negro Run Around," "Negroes Rarely Allowed," "Negroes Ruined Again," "Negroes Robbed Again," "No Roosevelt Again;' and the "Negro RemovalAct."4' Professor Herbert Hill said that "the legislation intended to be the cornerstone of President Roosevelt's program to protect and uplift the working class had ... become a millstone around the Black worker's In 1935, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the NRA unconstitutiona1.43 New Dealers mourned,44 but the black community

The celebration was short-lived. In 1935, Section 7a of the NRA became Section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), popularly known as the Wagner Act, which established unions as the sole collective bargaining unit once the union became certified by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The Wagner Act banned company unions and allowed unions to establish closed shops that had the power to bar non-members from employment. Originally, the Wagner Act contained a clause barring unions from discriminating against blacks. At the time, Howard's Professor Miller predicted "the doom of the Negro in America industry if the Wagner Act did not contain a clause protecting Under AFL political pressure, Senator Wagner dropped the anti-discrimination clause in order to retain union support and insure the act's passage.47 Most New Dealers thought that discrimination against blacks was an acceptable and inevitable cost of economic recovery.48 The Wagner Act was widely thought to be unconstitutional;49 however, the "new" Supreme Court, having abandoned judicial review of economic legislation, upheld its constitutionality.50 This translated the unequal treatment of blacks by unions into a loss of previously available employment opportunities. In 1945, the NLRB made a face-saving ruling that a statutory bargaining agent must represent all employees fairly without regard to race.51 However, the board also ruled that segregation and exclusion of blacks from union membership did not constitute an unfair labor practice. And it held that segregating blacks and whites into separate local unions was not a form of discrimination per se.52

New Deal legislation was clearly devastating for the black worker. In 1930, the national total unemployment rate was 6.13 percent. However, in that year, unemployment for blacks stood at 5.17 percent, almost a full percentage point below that for whites. Nineteen thirty was to be the last year
when a larger percentage of whites than of blacks would be unemployed.53


.
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,703
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,606
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Unions are racist and inefficient. They're ruining American competitiveness. The best bet here is to destroy all unions and get rid of minimum wages, so that the free market decides whose worth what. That way, Black people will be at full employment. The minimum wage is excluding millions of Blacks from the labour force. Just think of the Millions of new jobs that would be open, if companies could just pay them 5.25 an hour :wow:
 

JahFocus CS

Get It How You Get It
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
20,461
Reputation
3,755
Daps
82,445
Reppin
Republic of New Afrika
Unions are racist and inefficient. They're ruining American competitiveness. The best bet here is to destroy all unions and get rid of minimum wages, so that the free market decides whose worth what. That way, Black people will be at full employment. The minimum wage is excluding millions of Blacks from the labour force. Just think of the Millions of new jobs that would be open, if companies could just pay them 5.25 an hour :wow:

The unemployment rate in the Black community was 0% during slavery. :wow:
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,333
Daps
89,592
Unions are racist and inefficient. They're ruining American competitiveness. The best bet here is to destroy all unions and get rid of minimum wages, so that the free market decides whose worth what. That way, Black people will be at full employment. The minimum wage is excluding millions of Blacks from the labour force. Just think of the Millions of new jobs that would be open, if companies could just pay them 5.25 an hour :wow:
If a company offered 5.25 or lower and hour and someone wanted to take it, why would you be against it?
I would think if the issue is blacks needing to acquire capital so we can seperate and do our own thing without the white power structure, eliminating an avenue of achieving that capital, whether you look down at it or not, would be counter productive.
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,333
Daps
89,592
The unemployment rate in the Black community was 0% during slavery. :wow:

What was the unemployment after slavery, what was the unemployment in 1930 for blacks, oh, better to be economically crippled and big white folks for a handout to help us out, than allow us to work and do for ourselves and build our own infrastructure and own pathways for economic success like every other community in this nation, except us.

Then you can get on a website and make post after post shytting on black americans not having control of their own businesses and etc right.
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,703
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,606
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
If a company offered 5.25 or lower and hour and someone wanted to take it, why would you be against it?
I would think if the issue is blacks needing to acquire capital so we can seperate and do our own thing without the white power structure, eliminating an avenue of achieving that capital, whether you look down at it or not, would be counter productive.

Because... 5.25 is a slave wage? :dead:

How could anyone afford food or rent with 5.25? You realize the government is going to cover the cost of living?
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,333
Daps
89,592
Because... 5.25 is a slave wage? :dead:

How could anyone afford food or rent with 5.25? You realize the government is going to cover the cost of living?
Slaves didn't have a choice for what work they performed and they didn't get a wage, they were property.
So saying a wage that someone accepts voluntarily for a job is slave wage makes no logical sense whatsoever.

As for what they could afford with 5.25 an hour, more than the alternative of 0.00 dollars an hour that they make by not having a opportunity to work at all.
The government is coving the cost of those same people being jobless now, so it would be worse if they had less to cover? That makes no logical sense.
 

JahFocus CS

Get It How You Get It
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
20,461
Reputation
3,755
Daps
82,445
Reppin
Republic of New Afrika
lmao more of this right-libertarian nonsense

Under capitalism, the alternative for a working class person (who has nothing to sell but their labor) to not renting himself out (aka "being employed") is starving and being homeless. That's no choice at all. There's no "voluntarily accepting" a shyt job under those conditions. There's no choice.

As for your other post about the unions @David_TheMan, I will get to it tomorrow probably.
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,333
Daps
89,592
lmao more of this right-libertarian nonsense

Under capitalism, the alternative for a working class person (who has nothing to sell but their labor) to not renting himself out (aka "being employed") is starving and being homeless. That's no choice at all. There's no "voluntarily accepting" a shyt job under those conditions. There's no choice.
s
As for your other post about the unions @David_TheMan, I will get to it tomorrow probably.

If you don't work and don't want to work for income you deserve to starve, you certainly don't have a right to steal the resources from those who have sacrificed their body to work and gain income, to give to those who refuse to do so.

Yes you have to choice, work or find a marketable skill to gain resources or dont , it is entirely voluntary.

A shyt job is a job, if you think you are entitle to a good job with no skill you should find out exactly what you your entitlement gets you, nothing and again that is most definitely a choice.

As for unions its fact, lke I said I'm happy to send you a link or get the book to you if you want it.
 

JahFocus CS

Get It How You Get It
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
20,461
Reputation
3,755
Daps
82,445
Reppin
Republic of New Afrika
If you don't work and don't want to work for income you deserve to starve, you certainly don't have a right to steal the resources from those who have sacrificed their body to work and gain income, to give to those who refuse to do so.

Yes you have to choice, work or find a marketable skill to gain resources or dont , it is entirely voluntary.

A shyt job is a job, if you think you are entitle to a good job with no skill you should find out exactly what you your entitlement gets you, nothing and again that is most definitely a choice.

As for unions its fact, lke I said I'm happy to send you a link or get the book to you if you want it.

same tired nonsense the ruling class has been pushing on people for like 300 years now.

The working class should democratically be deciding what is produced, how it is produced, and how it is distributed. Period. Not having to rent themselves out on the marketplace to the ruling class.

Under chattel slavery, enslaved folks' labor was controlled by one slaveholder/slaveholding family.
Under capitalism, the labor of the entire working class -- billions of people -- is controlled by a small elite who control the means of production.

What you are peddling has absolutely nothing to offer the masses of people, and particularly Afrikans, who have suffered enough under capitalism.
 
Last edited:
Top