Huey P Newton’s 1979 murder trial accusing him of shooting a 17 year old prostitute was insane

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
336,173
Reputation
-34,801
Daps
640,182
Reppin
The Deep State
would he be found guilty today ? :lupe: :francis:



Huey Newton Defense Contends A Key Witness Was Real Killer

Summarize

March 13, 1979
By Wallace Turner; Special to The New York Times

Huey Newton Defense Contends A Key Witness Was Real Killer
The New York Times Archives
See the article in its original context from
March 13, 1979, Section A, Page 16Buy Reprints
View on timesmachine
TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for home delivery and digital subscribers.

About the Archive

This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.

Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.

OAKLAND, Calif., March 12 — An alibi buttressed by identification of the “real’ killer” unfolded in court today as Huey P. Newton's defense to the charge that he shot and killed a 17‐year‐old prostitute who was working her street corner.

In his opening statement, Michael Kennedy, the New York lawyer defending Mr. Newton. disclosed the defense of the founder of the Black Panther Party to, a murder charge in Alameda County Superior Court.

A bodyguard for Mr. Newton testified later that he saw Caries Buie shoot the prostitute. Mr. Buie, 25 years old, testified last week as a prosecution witness, under Federal protection. Mr. Newton is also scheduled to testify.

Mr. Buie said that about 1 A.M. on Aug. 6. 1974, at an Oakland corner where he was selling marijuana to prostitutes, he saw a Lincoln Continental with two men in it, both black. One of them summoned one of the prostitutes, but they would not go to the car, he said.

Then, Mr. Buie testified, he recognized Mr. Newton, whom he knew slightly, leaving the car to walk over to Kathleen Smith. 17, one of the women on the corner. They quarreled, he said, and then Mr. Newton drew a silver‐colored gun and shot Miss Smith in the face.

Another prosecution witness was Michelle Jenkins, 20, who had been at the same corner. She said she had seen Mr. Newton,get out of the car and confront Miss Smith after the women refused to go to the car. She said that her pimp had warned her to stay away from big cars with black men in them because the men probably were competing pimps.

Miss Jenkins said she, too, knew Mr. Newton and that she heard him say to Miss Smith. “Don't you know who you're talking to and who I am?” Miss Jenkins also said she had seen Mr. Newton shoot Miss Smith.

Larry Henson, a member of the Panther security squad since 1973, took the stand today to swear that he saw Mr. Buie shoot Miss Smith. Mr. Henson said that he was introduced to Mr. Buie. earlier that night by Robert Heard. another sec*nty squad member. They offered Mr. Buie a ride, Mr. Henson said, and took him to the intersection he sped tied.

Mr. Henson said he saw Mr. Buie walk away from the car toward a woman on the corner, pull a gun and shoot her, then wheel and return to the cat. But, said Mr. Henson, he and Mr. Heard drove away.

Mr. Heard presumably is not available as a witness because he disappeared after he and Mr. Newton were involved in tavern fight near Santa Cruz last year. Mr. Newton's charges were dropped. but those against Mr. Heard are pending.

The alibi witness who testified today is Donald Freed, a Los Angeles writer who is associated with Mark Lane in the Committee of Inquiry, a organization of persons interested in conspiracy theories in volving assassinations. Mr. Freed is the author of “Executive Action,” a novel patterned on the assassination of President Kennedy that became a movie.

Mr. Freed testified that on the night when Miss Smith was killed, he was with Mr. Newton all night in Mr. Newton's apartment where they worked on the manuscript of “Jesus, the Son of God.” for Radical Religion, a Berkeley quarter ly. Other sources said the article also was Mr. Newton's master's thesis at the Unicersity of California at Santa Cruz, where he is a graduate student in the history of consciousness program.

Pressed to ay why he had not spoken out earlier, Mr Freed said that he told Charles R. Garry. a San Francisco lawyer who formerly represented Mr. Newton, and that Mr. Garry had told him to keep quiet.

Mr. Garry said he would have no comment on the testimony because it jnvolved attorney‐client privilege. Mr. Garry represented Mr. Newton from 1968 until Mr. Newton jumped bad and fled to Cuba in 1974 after the murder of the prostitute.

Mr. Newton returned home in July 1977. He was tried and acquitted last fail of assault charges involving the pistolwhipping of a tailor. Mr. Newton was convicted of a companion charge of being a former convict in possession of a gun and was sentenced to two years. He has appealed.

Sign up for California Today
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
336,173
Reputation
-34,801
Daps
640,182
Reppin
The Deep State

Murder Trial of Newton Ends in Mistrial on Coast
Summarize
March 25, 1979
By Wallace Turner Special to The New York Times

Murder Trial of Newton Ends in Mistrial on Coast
The New York Times Archives
See the article in its original context from
March 25, 1979, Page 26Buy Reprints
View on timesmachine
TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for home delivery and digital subscribers.

About the Archive

This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.

Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.

OAKLAND, Calif., March 24 — The murder trial of Huey P. Newton, the Black Panther leader, ended in a mistrial today with the jury divided 10 to 2 for ac??.

Judge Carl Anderson of Superior Court declared the mistrial at noon after the jury had deliberated for 21 hours and failed to reach a verdict on four ballots. Mr. Newton, 37 years old, stood accused of slaying a 17‐year‐old prostitute on an Oakland street corner in 1974. He has said he was elsewhere when the woman was fatally wounded.

The prosecutor, Tom Orloff, said that a decision on whether to retry the case rested with District Attorney Lowell Jensen of Alameda County. Mr. Newton will be arraigned on the murder charge again on Tuesday.

“If I was the D.A., I wouldn't try me again,” Mr. Newton told reporters after the jury was dismissed. “The trial was a farce. I should have been acquitted after an hour.”

Mr. Newton's attorney, Michael Kennedy, said, “The two holdouts represent fear and loathing in Oakland.”

This morning, before the mistrial was declared, Mr. Kennedy urged Judge Anderson to dismiss Dorothy Silva, one of the two jurors who voted for conviction. Mr. Kennedy made the motion after the jury's foreman, Janet Hurly, disclosed that when alternate jurors were dismissed as deliberations began one of them had passed a note which said “hang him” to the Silva woman.

Judge Anderson ruled that the incident did not justify dismissal.

Neither of the two jurors who voted for conviction could be reached for comment after the jury was dismissed.

Mr. Jensen is no stranger to hung juries in Huey Newton murder trials. He prosecuted Mr. Newton twice with that result in the death of an Oakland policeman a decade ago and finally dismissed the charge. Mr. Orloff, a Deputy District Attorney, said that he hoped to prosecute the latest case again because, he said, “I will have time to investigate the validity of the defense, which I did not have time to do during this trial.”

The murder charge against Mr. Newton was one of the factors that caused him to flee to Mexico and then to Cuba in 1974. That flight, and the events that occurred when he returned in 1977, have had an immense effect on the Black Panthers.

When he went away, others stepped forward to support Elaine Brown, who became the organization's leader, in a move that saw Panthers assume important roles in lower levels of government in Oakland and Berkeley. When Mr. Newton returned, this effort faltered.

In its place came an emphasis on the idea that the black militant organization was tied to Mr. Newton's fortunes. Miss Brown left Oakland and now lives in Los Angeles. No other leader in the organization rivals Mr. Newton.

The trial was a series of misadventures for the prosecution. Before it opened, the prosecution announced that there were four witnesses who would identify Mr. Newton as the man who fired a pistol at Kathleen Smith, a 17‐year‐old prostitute, after an argument on an Oakland street corner at 1:30 A.M. Aug. 6, 1974. The bullet penetrated her brain. She died three months later without regaining consciousness.

The prosecution had learned by opening day that one of its “witnesses,” a prostitute who was serving a sentence for murder, could not have seen the killing, as she had said she had, because she was in county jail that night.

Another purported witness who failed to testify at the trial was Raphelle Gary, alias Crystal Gray, a prostitute, who may have been the target of a Black Panther assassination squad. From the beginning of the investigation Oakland authorities had Miss Gary's story, which was that she saw Mr. Newton shoot Miss Smith.

About four months after Mr. Newton returned from Cuba, a mysterious attack was made against the back door of one of Miss Gary's neighbors. The neighbor fired through the door, and shots were returned. Police officers found a Black Panther dead in the lawn, and another was identified as having asked for medical treatment for a gunshot wound in the hand.

The wounded Panther disappeared. A campanion, who took him to the hospital to request treatment, was found wounded, paralyzed and left for dead in a shallow grave. He told police that he thought the other man had been killed by a Panther assassination squad.

Miss Gary was not called as a prosecution witness in the trial, although in pretrial proceedings she identified Mr. Newton as the man who shot Miss Smith. No explanation was offered by the prosecutor, but others said the state was unwilling to pay the price she demanded for her testimony—leniency for a friend.

Switch in Testimony

The third of the prosecution witnesses who had been expected to identify Mr. Newton as the killer was Michelle Jenkins, 20, a prostitute who also was working the corner that night. She testified on March 7, and as predicted, said the shot was fired by Mr. Newton.

But two weeks later she was called as a defense witness and said that Mr. Newton was not the man who fired the shot. She did not know who fired the shot, she said, but was certain it was not Mr. Newton.

However, the fourth identifying witness, Caries Buie, 25, performed as expected. He is living under protection of United States marshals.

One of the first defense witnesses was Larry Henson, one of Mr. Newton's bodyguards, who said that he saw Mr. Buie walk up to Miss Smith and shoot her in the face.

Sign up for California Today
 
Top