I agree with Scottie Warriors wasn’t a dynasty

Was Golden State Really a Dynasty

  • Yes

    Votes: 29 93.5%
  • Nope

    Votes: 2 6.5%

  • Total voters
    31

Yagirlcheatinonus

Icon Poster
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
11,630
Reputation
-64
Daps
19,112
Reppin
NULL
Great teams are often remembered for their ability to dominate eras without compromise, to define a style of play and stand unchallenged for years.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the 2010s, no franchise commanded more attention than the Golden State Warriors. They turned long-range shooting into a weapon of mass destruction, shattered regular-season records, and forced an entire league to adapt.

Yet for all the accolades and historic runs, there remains a section of the basketball world that does not consider them one of the greatest teams in NBA history.

Among the voices in that group is Chicago Bulls legend Scottie Pippen, whose six championships in the 1990s give him a rare vantage point when judging dynasties.

ADVERTISEMENT

Not a dynasty​

Pippen’s perspective is shaped by his era, which was defined by rosters built to last, squads that faced the same core opponents year after year and overcame them without significant external reinforcements. That context colors his view of the Warriors, whose journey from upstart contender to perennial champion included a seismic shift in the summer of 2016.

“You say they’re on a dynasty run, but I don’t see it that way,” Pippen said. “They picked up probably the best player in the game after they won their first championship. I don’t consider that a dynasty run. They went out and got the best player in the game after they won their first championship and after they lost in the Finals defending their first title.”

ADVERTISEMENT

When the Bulls reigned in the 1990s, the roster evolved slowly, and victories came against Hall of Fame competition without a blockbuster mid-reign acquisition of the league’s top player. In June 2016, the Golden State had just completed a record-breaking 73-9 regular season, an achievement that seemed destined to cement them among the all-time greats.

However, their campaign ended in shock when LeBron James and the Cavaliers erased a 3-1 deficit in the Finals, delivering Cleveland its first championship in franchise history. The Warriors responded with a move that shook the league. Kevin Durant, a four-time scoring champion and the 2014 MVP, left the Oklahoma City Thunder to join the very team that had eliminated him weeks earlier.

The Golden State dynasty​

Statistics alone might suggest that the Warriors belong in the pantheon. Between 2015 and 2022, they secured four championships, weathered injuries, roster turnover, and even a two-year absence from playoff contention, only to return and win again. In that same span, no other franchise claimed more than one title.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t see them as a dynasty,” Pippen said. “I think bringing Kevin Durant in really changed my respect as to where I rank this team going forward in terms of a dynasty.”

He feels that Durant's addition tipped the balance in a way that distorts the historical comparison. His respect for the Warriors' original core of Steph Curry, Klay Thompson, and Draymond Green is clear, but he separates their 2015 title and 2022 comeback from the Durant-led years, which he views differently in the dynasty conversation.

What remains undeniable is that Golden State built a dominant team. Whether or not they sit alongside the 1990s Bulls, the 1980s Los Angeles Lakers, or the early 2000s San Antonio Spurs is a conversation that will likely never reach full consensus.
 

MyApps

All Star
Joined
Jan 22, 2016
Messages
2,425
Reputation
225
Daps
6,283
Reppin
Oakland
If the warriors aren't a dynasty, the 80s Celtics DAMN SURE weren't a dynasty either.

Hell with Scottie's logic, the 80s Lakers weren't a dynasty either.
 

10bandz

RIP to the GOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Messages
45,924
Reputation
8,919
Daps
227,951
If the warriors aren't a dynasty, the 80s Celtics DAMN SURE weren't a dynasty either.

Hell with Scottie's logic, the 80s Lakers weren't a dynasty either.


The 80s Celtics werent a dynasty. 3 titles spaced out over 9 years, got swept in the 1st round by the Bucks and lost several ECFs

80s Lakers were cemented as a dynasty in 88 when they repeated.
 

MyApps

All Star
Joined
Jan 22, 2016
Messages
2,425
Reputation
225
Daps
6,283
Reppin
Oakland
The 80s Celtics werent a dynasty. 3 titles spaced out over 9 years, got swept in the 1st round by the Bucks and lost several ECFs

80s Lakers were cemented as a dynasty in 88 when they repeated.
Many circles would argue they were a dynasty.

CoDynasty with the Lakers, which is what made the 80s so great.

Not saying it's true, but people believe it.

Just like people believe Bron is the GOAT

:yeshrug:
 

Harry B

Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
33,032
Reputation
-866
Daps
66,825
I love when people talk about man coined terms like face of the league, dynasty and on like it’s science. When in reality it was just some random young journalist who probably was just excited and talking outta his ass when he coined the term :mjlol:


I don’t know what they were but I know that they would smoke any so called dynasty in 5 games or less :umad:
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
45,915
Reputation
7,516
Daps
142,069
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
They are a dynasty imo, 3 chips in 4 years, 4 chips in 8 years overall with the same drafted core of Steph, Klay and Draymond. Plus they went to the finals 5 straight years in a row. They got a big boost from KD though so that kinda tarnish them somewhat.
Would you or others say that if your team was the one that benefitted from it?
 

Mandizi

5-I-3 till I D-I-E
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,749
Reputation
772
Daps
18,006
Reppin
Cincy
If the warriors aren't a dynasty, the 80s Celtics DAMN SURE weren't a dynasty either.

Hell with Scottie's logic, the 80s Lakers weren't a dynasty either.
Lakers 5 titles in 9 years >>> Warriors 4 titles in 8 years
 
Top