"I believe Goodell railroaded Tom Brady" UPDATE: Transcripts Released - NFL, RAVENS & COLTS EXPOSED

[NV-ME]

giants fans who say this shyt ether themselves so hard. so you beat a team that cheated? as in, the team that, under this hypothetical, should not have even been in the super bowl, and in their place should have been the chargers/ravens, who could have just as easily beaten the giants in both years, thus leaving the giants with 0 super bowls since the first Bush administration?


That just casts further doubt onto the Giants' two trophies from that timeframe, which is why it's so much more embarrassing for all giants fans who continue echoing this sentiment just like yours

eli: 2-0 in feb

 

[Spiritual Stratocaster]

giants fans who say this shyt ether themselves so hard. so you beat a team that cheated? as in, the team that, under this hypothetical, should not have even been in the super bowl, and in their place should have been the chargers/ravens, who could have just as easily beaten the giants in both years, thus leaving the giants with 0 super bowls since the first Bush administration?


That just casts further doubt onto the Giants' two trophies from that timeframe, which is why it's so much more embarrassing for all giants fans who continue echoing this sentiment just like yours

 

[ill]

You mother fukkers better start apologizing to the Gawd Brady

 

[Maluma]

of course pats fans got it right the whole time (ever since January, it was so obvious if you even remotely understand the ideal gas law, and then the last few weeks when it became obvious the NFL did some shady shyt to illegally hand down a suspension) and low IQ seattle fans like @VMR exposed themselves hard for a good 8 months (well, their entire lives as seahawks fans but thats besides the point.

time for the @cook to hand all the mental midgets one of these:

@BucciMane

 

[cook]

@JUSE_HEDD

@JUSE_HEDD

@JUSE_HEDD



Anyone seen @JUSE_HEDD ????

His last post was Monday

but wait ....
JUSE_HEDD was last seen: Yesterday at 10:34 PM


sohh he's been online but suddenly berry berry quiet

 

[ill]

@JUSE_HEDD

@JUSE_HEDD

@JUSE_HEDD



Anyone seen @JUSE_HEDD ????

His last post was Monday

but wait ....
JUSE_HEDD was last seen: Yesterday at 10:34 PM


sohh he's been online but suddenly berry berry quiet

This dude needs to be called out over and over. @JUSE_HEDD Where you at??

Its gonna be alright, breh. No need to jump off any tall buildings.. All this means is that Peyton is retiring with that one and only Lombardi trophy. Sorry buddy but the Gawd is back!

 

[NYC Rebel]

The NFL fukked up by not telling Brady that he was subject to punishment had he not turn over his information in a timely fashion. That was more a fukk up when NFL's part than Innocence regarding Brady

 

[No1]

The NFL fukked up by not telling Brady that he was subject to punishment had he not turn over his information in a timely fashion. That was more a fukk up when NFL's part than Innocence regarding Brady

 

[NYC Rebel]

Exactly what did you debunk?

That is where the ruling stands. It doesn't address Brady's innocence.

 

[Maluma]

Exactly what did you debunk?

That is where the ruling stands. It doesn't address Brady's innocence.

act like this is the ONLY THING Berman talked about in his 40 page ruling brehs

 

[NYC Rebel]

act like this is the ONLY THING Berman talked about in his 40 page ruling brehs

bottomline, the NFL deserved this ruling because they came at Brady w/o telling him the implications for not completly cooperating

I really don't have to get all verbose or grandiose about the ruling. At the end of the day, that was the reason.

 

[No1]

bottomline, the NFL deserved this ruling because they came at Brady w/o telling him the implications for not completly cooperating

I really don't have to get all verbose or grandiose about the ruling. At the end of the day, that was the reason.

No, it was not the only reason. The Brady camp brought up 5 different reasons it should be overturned. The judge did not rule on one of them and agreed on 3 of them. One of them was that the investigation was the NFL refused to provide Brady with the evidence against him by not allowing Pash to testify or allowing them to see Well's notes. Pash edited the Wells report (NFL counsel) and when Brady asked to s Well's notes he claimed "attorney-client privilege." Translation --> I am workinng for the NFL and I am not impartial. I won't evne waste my time further because you're just a stubborn ass nikka and it shows in every subject you partake it. It works on a lot of social issues because you are on the right side on principal but when you're wrong you have tunnel vision. Even reporters who thought Brady was guilty in the first place said after now having all the facts the est you can claim is that "you don't know." Yet, here you are, a dude who was so proudly screaming about it was clear now caring about nuance all of a sudden.

The NFL's Wells Report has been obliterated by every legal scholar worth a damn and it even reached the point where a Nobel Laureate weighed in and said the science was ass. But you are so fukking biased that you accepted a report conducted by the same nikkas who are brught in whenever big tobacco wants science in their favor. Does that look like the NFL wanted a legitimate report? I expected the rest of those irrational support anything even if it's domestic violence because it's a black-dude ass nikkas to act like that but I expected you to actually review the shyt. You say that it did not prove he was innocent, it was never proven he was guilty of anything either and in a legitimate court the case would have been tossed out.

 

[NYC Rebel]

No, it was not the only reason. The Brady camp brought up 5 different reasons it should be overturned. The judge did not rule on one of them and agreed on 3 of them. One of them was that the investigation was the NFL refused to provide Brady with the evidence against him by not allowing Pash to testify or allowing them to see Well's notes. Pash edited the Wells report (NFL counsel) and when Brady asked to s Well's notes he claimed "attorney-client privilege." Translation --> I am workinng for the NFL and I am not impartial. I won't evne waste my time further because you're just a stubborn ass nikka and it shows in every subject you partake it. It works on a lot of social issues because you are on the right side on principal but when you're wrong you have tunnel vision. Even reporters who thought Brady was guilty in the first place said after now having all the facts the est you can claim is that "you don't know." Yet, here you are, a dude who was so proudly screaming about it was clear now caring about nuance all of a sudden.

The NFL's Wells Report has been obliterated by every legal scholar worth a damn and it even reached the point where a Nobel Laureate weighed in and said the science was ass. But you are so fukking biased that you accepted a report conducted by the same nikkas who are brught in whenever big tobacco wants science in their favor. Does that look like the NFL wanted a legitimate report? I expected the rest of those irrational support anything even if it's domestic violence because it's a black-dude ass nikkas to act like that but I expected you to actually review the shyt. You say that it did not prove he was innocent, it was never proven he was guilty of anything either and in a legitimate court the case would have been tossed out.

It was the main reason bruh. I don't care about what reporters are now saying. There's really no way are d that "deflator" comment or believing that equipment guys knows what's best for Brady grip on a football. At the end of the day, as an employer, you tell who your re investigating the punishment tied to their names n compliance.....and the NFL didn't and paid a just price for it.

 

[Maluma]

NYC rebel embarrassing himself hard ITT

 

[Raquinotj]

This site is absolutely pathetic.
Like the definition of throwing shyt to the wall and hoping it sticks.
I guess since "everyone cheats" it's OK for the Pats to.
You'd have to be a complete idiot to take this site serious, and I hope it's a trollsite aimed at trolling delusional Patriots fans into thinking their team isn't at fault.

This site lists "SuckforLuckgate" as being a 4.5/5 severity level in cheating.
Nevermind that the Colts were just trash, because Polian mismanaged the roster. And nevermind that Indy cleaned house and fired pretty much everyone after the season. Polian/Caldwell and friends deliberately lost games in order to tank for Luck? Even though they were all fired before he arrived? Why?

They also list Deflategate as a 1.5/5 severity for the Colts, but a 0 severity for the Patriots. They pretty much downplay any Pats cheating.


They also list the Colts allegedly pumping in noise as a 1.5/5 severity infraction, despite the fact that the NFL cleared them. And it was the fakkit ass Pats who tried to snitch and failed. At least Indy can snitch correctly, Indy put the Patriots in a $1,000,000 hole. See you next year in the first round of the draft

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/06/sports/football/06patriots.html?_r=0



Only a dumbass fanbase like the Pats would try to bring up the Colts "pumping in noise" (cleared by NFL) and sidestepp the fact that the Pats tried to snitch...while being mad at the Colts for snitching on the Patriots (2015) for actually being outside of the rules. Support teams that not only cheat, but also try to snitch on other teams for cheating. No honor among thieves scumbaggery.

Hope they uphold the suspension so you lames can boycott and Brady,Belichick,Pats,Maine,New Hampshire and all them shyts can go to Canada and join the CFL.

You Mad Son...

Let this Marinate tho

#The4GOD...