I cringe everytime you losers use efficiency as an argument point...

YBE

Banned
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
5,125
Reputation
11
Daps
5,518
Especially when you ignore the differences in each player's game......scoring mostly in the post, from shooting or slashing/driving all game. It's the most low level argument there is.





































.587 .280 .751 11.9 3.2 1.3 1.3 28.3 - Barkley
.531 .362 .771 7.9 6.2 1.9 0.8 27.1 - Lebron
.496 .387 .860 8.0 3.5 1.3 1.2 28.0 - Durant


"Chuck scored more points more efficiently than LeBron & KD. I guess he's better" :jawalrus:

sir+charles.jpg
 

AAKing23

92' til Infinity....
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
42,250
Reputation
6,988
Daps
154,559
Reppin
NJ-PA
eI agree :russ:


Just because a nikka took 100 shots 5ft from the rim and made 70% of them don't mean he better than a dude who shoots a lower percentage that takes tougher shots. :childplease:
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,132
Reputation
1,360
Daps
37,300
Reppin
Los Angeles
Especially when you ignore the differences in each player's game......scoring mostly in the post, from shooting or slashing/driving all game. It's the most low level argument there is.





































.587 .280 .751 11.9 3.2 1.3 1.3 28.3 - Barkley
.531 .362 .771 7.9 6.2 1.9 0.8 27.1 - Lebron
.496 .387 .860 8.0 3.5 1.3 1.2 28.0 - Durant


"Chuck scored more points more efficiently than LeBron & KD. I guess he's better" :jawalrus:

sir+charles.jpg

Yet you would say Barkley is better because he scored more :yeshrug:
 
Top