fukking Seahawks letting these scumbags win another Super Bowl

They try it, but realize they cant keep up, so they try to go to the league on some "They are cheating" sh!t, ask that fakkit Eric ManginiI just don't get how more teams aren't following their playbook. shyt like jumping the snap on long games. Patriots been doing this for the longest, and the shyt always works. Why isn't any other team doing it?
The pick plays I can see the argument that the Pats just execute the shyt perfectly...but jumping a snap on a long gain? just do the shyt too![]()
Okay, let me go ask him.They try it, but realize they cant keep up, so they try to go to the league on some "They are cheating" sh!t, ask that fakkit Eric Mangini
2003 title run the first two playoff games he played below average once again and they still won (one of those games he played bad) posting his rating in the 70's both games. SB he played good
2004 title run he played his first game below average and still won. Did good the next two games.
Honestly he has only balled out once during the playoffs and that was last year (meaning all his games during that post season run)
yea he didnt ball out against the Giants and the Pats lost because of that. That doesnt mean that the system failed nor does it mean the Brady needs to ball out to win. It just means that the Giants on those days played better along with luck
pont being is that the Pats can win games without their QB playing good all the time. Most teams cant say that unless you have a superior D. Just goes to show that Brady has always had a good team around him despite the myth of people saying he has no one.
it goes to show that wins and losses shouldnt be held accountable towards a QB
We can agree to disagree...
Just to end our back and forth debate and put a bow on it...
Your stance is the Patriots would still be a 4 time champ, perfect regular season(18-1), and currently 10-0 with any decent QB (the Matt Cassel's of the world)because of their system, correct?