Iceland Lawmakers to Ban Male Circumcision

AlainLocke

Banned
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
16,259
Reputation
2,640
Daps
74,082
You probably right. It might be all in their head. But the skin is rolled back when you’re in some p*ssy so they might be feeling all that extra real estate, the frenulum and all that shyt.

Nah...I mean the appearance of the shyt...

I had chicks just like the look of my shyt...

They don't know...


American chicks just been fed hella lies about penises...fortunately it ain't the 40s and shyt anymore and Americans ain't mutilating their sons as much as they used to...
 

Collateral

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2014
Messages
36,110
Reputation
8,020
Daps
218,170
Nah...I mean the appearance of the shyt...

I had chicks just like the look of my shyt...

They don't know...


American chicks just been fed hella lies about penises...fortunately it ain't the 40s and shyt anymore and Americans ain't mutilating their sons as much as they used to...
Not just women, dudes too. Just look at some of the replies in this thread :heh:
 
  • Dap
Reactions: Ros

MR. SNIFLES

**** YOU THUNDAAAAAAAAAAH
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
20,824
Reputation
6,621
Daps
83,953
Reppin
THUNDER BUDDIES
tumblr_ncdn6v1y7i1spetlmo1_400.gif
 

AlainLocke

Banned
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
16,259
Reputation
2,640
Daps
74,082
There is conflicting evidence, but I have read that the difference is mircotears that can occur from sex. Not enough to feel any discomfort, but enough for body fluids to find their way into the blood stream easier.

But high risk behavior is high risk at the end of the day, and normally transmission rates between hetrosexual couples is less risky because it’s primarily vaginal. (It’s also possible to have sex with someone multiple times who’s burning and not get an STD.) “Prepped” vaginas are less likely to have any tearing because of natural lubrication, unlike anal sex, where again, even though the one receiving doesn’t feel any mircotears they still can occur and increase of the risk of transmission.

This article makes an excellent argument for anybody wanting to know why circumcision is stupid..


Does Female Genital Mutilation Have Health Benefits? The Problem with Medicalizing Morality | Practical Ethics

My point is this...

American men are more circumcised than any other Western man...

There was an AIDS/STD epidemic in the USA...and there still is one in Black America

Africans due to Islam and tribalism...circumcise their boys... and there's an AIDS epidemic there

Circumcision doesn't prevent or even reduce any risks to make it worth doing...

And even if it did...the removal of breast tissue reduces breast cancer but nobody ever take their 13 year old daughter and have her breast tissue scooped out to avoid breast cancer...

The issue is about body integrity and do parents have the right to have unnecessary medical procedures done to their kids and it really boils down to...are children property of their parents


Cutting off the foreskin is mainly promoted in the West by the USA for a medical reason...when circumcision in the USA was about preventing boys from masturbating...which why it was widely adopted in the first place...and before that...genital cutting simply was ritual and cultural practice to identify members of a tribe or religious group

Today is still promoted under the guise of..."well I am cut so my son will be..." or worrying about if a woman decades from now will accept his penis...

Ultimately there is a gender bias...and nobody in the West approve of a girl to be circumcised or ritually marked like in Indonesia or Malaysia and it's less invasive than male circumcision. It is even politically distasteful and backwards to even suggest that Muslims and other groups to be allowed to practice female genital cutting or marking in a medical setting in the West.


Female circumcision has been correlated to reduced HIV infection rates in Africa...but how many Western women are willing to get cut to reduce risk of HIV? Are we gonna start suggesting we cut girls now?

https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=iph_theses

INTRODUCTION: Kenya like the rest of Sub-Saharan Africa continues to be plagued with high rates of AIDS/HIV. Research has shown that cultural practices have serious implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS, as well as other communicable diseases. One of the practices that have been speculated to have an impact on AIDS/HIV is female genital mutilation (FGM). Despite efforts to eradicate the practice, prevalence of FGM in Kenya remains relatively high. Researchers have postulated that various forms of FGM may be associated with the spread of HIV/AIDS. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between FGM and HIV/AIDS using a representative sample of Kenyan girls and women. METHODS: Data (n=3271) from the Kenya 2003 Demographic and Health Survey was used for this study. Chi-square test was used to examine the distribution of selected risk factors across HIV/AIDS status. Odds ratios from multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine association between FGM and HIV/AIDS. RESULTS: This study shows an inverse association (OR=0.508; 95% CI: 0.376-0.687) between FGM and HIV/AIDS, after adjusting for confounding variables.
 
Last edited:

AlainLocke

Banned
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
16,259
Reputation
2,640
Daps
74,082
Not just women, dudes too. Just look at some of the replies in this thread :heh:

I feel bad for a lot of dudes because they don't know that the foreskin is actually the most sensitive part of the penis and don't know that it's the most important part during sex cause it holds all the juices...and it keeps the tip soft and cushy....instead of dry and crusty...

So the reason why cut dudes be having jam their dikk in a bytch is because they can't feel shyt like uncut guys...it ain't cause they trying to fukk her rough

Reason why a chick may dry out is because the cut penis rubbed her shyt raw instead of absorbing it...cause the cut penis causes more friction than normal


Reduce the sexual pleasure of your sons brehs...:yeshrug:
 
Last edited:

Collateral

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2014
Messages
36,110
Reputation
8,020
Daps
218,170
I feel bad for a lot of dudes because they don't know that the foreskin is actually the most sensitive part of the penis and don't know that it's the most important part during sex cause it holds all the juices...and it keeps the tip soft and cushy....instead of dry and crusty...

So the reason why uncut dudes be having jam their dikk in a bytch is because they can't feel shyt like uncut guys...it ain't cause they trying to fukk her rough

Reason why a chick may dry out is because the cut penis rubbed her shyt raw instead of absorbing it...cause the cut penis causes more friction than normal


Reduce the sexual pleasure of your sons brehs...:yeshrug:
100% facts dude.
 

Family Man

Banned
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
13,175
Reputation
1,954
Daps
54,988
A doctor I used a few years ago botched a baby boy's circumcision and cut off too much of his penis. Parents got paid a couple of million but how do you tell you son he is missing part of his dikk because you took him to get part of it (foreskin) cut off without medical necessity and now he's missing a good chunk of it?
That's one of the main reasons I did not get my son circumcised. I ain't chancing something going wrong just because. I couldn't come up with one benefit for my son getting circumcised that would outweigh the risk of the actual operation itself.

What I learned also is that these doctors and hospitals make a shyt load of money off of these types of procedures.
 
Last edited:
Top