If Jordan never retired, how many in a row would they have won?

[PS5 Pro]

I'd say 4 in a row, and 7 out of 8yrs with the only loss coming to Houston during their 2nd finals meeting

Personally, I always wondered if Houston would have beaten them? I felt one of those teams would have if not both. And wouldn't be shocked if they won NONE of them as well.

I just felt that was the best team Jordan would have faced in the finals

 

[360Waves]

Negative reputation.
Negative dap ratio.

Now I know why. Trash thread.

 

[smitty22]

Finals need to hurry up n start

 

[PS5 Pro]

Negative reputation.
Negative dap ratio.

Now I know why. Trash thread.

Bruh, NY did lose to MJ and thus... oh wait, yall lost to Houston

To be honest, those New York teams are probably my favorite teams of all time.
John Stock/Allan Houston/Xavier McDaniels/Ewing/Charles Oakley dem were my nikkaz
All them nikkaz was forced to lean by the greatest to ever do it.

4 in a row, 7 of 8. Now if you would like to drop your opinion, please do. If not, not sure why your mother gave birth. But it wasn't for this bruh

 

[RoCKetSity256]

three

 

[MikelArteta]

8
They won 55 games the year after Jordan retired

 

[ill]

8
They won 55 games the year after Jordan retired

This. The Rockets aint shyt and would have lost both years if Jordan was still playing.

 

[Originalman]

Minimum of a 19 peat my friend.

 

[Juggalo Fred]

the Rockets still win 1 of those 2 titles

 

[Alexander The Great]

think they could have got at least 4 in a row, beating Houston that 1st year. don't know if they beat them the 2nd.

 

[jadillac]

the amount of times this question has been asked on here.

 

[threattonature]

8
They won 55 games the year after Jordan retired

Not that simple though. Would they have still lost Grant the year after winning 55 games. I see no way they would've won that second year with no Grant regardless. Also with Jordan still there would Pippen have made the strides to improve as much as he did with Jordan gone or even Kukoc. I don't think either would've been quite as good if they didn't have to carry the team. Or if they were still winning would they have been willing to take on Rodman. Not to mention the extra year and a wear and tear that would've been on Pippen and Jordan no way would they have still been winning as long as they did.

 

[PS5 Pro]

Not that simple though. Would they have still lost Grant the year after winning 55 games. I see no way they would've won that second year with no Grant regardless. Also with Jordan still there would Pippen have made the strides to improve as much as he did with Jordan gone or even Kukoc. I don't think either would've been quite as good if they didn't have to carry the team. Or if they were still winning would they have been willing to take on Rodman. Not to mention the extra year and a wear and tear that would've been on Pippen and Jordan no way would they have still been winning as long as they did.

Lets also remember the REASON Jordan retired in the first place. How would he have played with his Father murdered/etc.
Yeah, maybe they would have went undefeated. Or maybe Jordan would be looking off into space when a ball was passed to him. And he'd be like
He NEEDED the time away. So maybe he would have burned out at one point during that 8yr stretch?
Tons of possibilities, but I don't see them beating Houston both years. Only because Houston was deep and clutch. Clutch City ;) While Chicago didn't have enough depth to hang... IMO.

the amount of times this question has been asked on here.

Really, this site only been here for 2yrs and this been done over and over again my nikka
Well, you could link it. Until then, and maybe even after then.. this thread shall continue

 

[hayesc0]

12