If the ground can't force a fumble, how can it force an incomplete?
- Thread starter Danny Up
- Start date
Bilz
Superstar
The rule is stupid as fukk, as is the way they're interpreting it. The way they SHOULD be viewing it as if a guy dives for a ball and catches it while airborne but it comes loose as he hits the ground, it's an incomplete. No one has any issue with that. But if you come down with both feet and the ball doesn't come loose until after you get tackled and hit the ground, there is no sense to that shyt being ruled incomplete.
They think they're making the rule black and white but they're not. Whether or not a guy made a "football move" is STILL a judgement call and a matter of opinion.
