If you're Kevin Sumlin and USC comes calling.....

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,733
Reppin
NULL
In the 60's and 70's, most of the NFL talent was coming out of HBCU's.

The 80's and 90's is when all D1 PWI had fully intergrated football teams.
:dwillhuh:

What does this have to do with anything? Dude you stay off topic.. please stop quoting me.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
58,163
Reputation
9,735
Daps
179,362
Are you jaded about them kicking OU's ass or something? I've never seen you take such a terrible stance on something college football related.

It's already been established that every team has gone through a bad stretch. Just before Saban got there, Bama had years where they went 4-7, 3-8, 6-6. This takes nothing away from the big picture, that they are great recently and were great in the past. You and these other rugrats can ignore those facts all you want and keep selecting pockets of years that skew your flimsy argument. Fact is they have the history and the very recent success that 99% of other schools do not have. That's why USC will always be a better job than A&M.

20 consecutive years is not a "pocket of years" :heh:

I'm really not sure what ur trying to prove, but you're jumping from square to square.

OU was the most successful program of the 00's when it comes to wins, were great in the 60's, 70's, part of the 80's. But even I wouldnt say we're teh #1 or #2 program of all time. Nor would I say for certainty that OU is a better coaching job than say Ohio State. Who cares about the 1930s when there were no black players

What you need to realize is, HISTORY IS ALWAYS BEING RE-WRITTEN. If A&M went on an Alabama type run over the next 5 years, you're still gonna tel me it's a lower-tier job than USC?

Some of you are like Nebraska fans still thinking it's 1995.

I'm done arguing about this b/c you're arguing in circles about a point that I NEVER made
 

Silkk

Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
215,999
Reputation
22,549
Daps
542,417
You seriously asking this question? :wtf: The fukk else do you want? Saban isn't coming to L.A. breh.
Sumlin's defense is terrible, there are a lot of good coaches besides him and saban
 

Silkk

Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
215,999
Reputation
22,549
Daps
542,417
Breh did you forget what conference USC plays in? Defense is non existence out there.
A Dominant defense is what is needed in the pac 12. Look at Stanford now, us under Pete and even now under Coach O.

Dominant Defense > Dominant Offense
 

Yogi

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
3,799
Reputation
344
Daps
17,203
Reppin
NULL
He staying at A&M. They will be a monster in a couple of years.


Kevin Sumlin, the hottest commodity in the college coaching world this fall, has recommitted to stay as the head coach at Texas A&M, sources told CBSSports.com on Saturday.

Later in the day Saturday, the school announced that it has reached an agreement in principle with Sumlin on new six-year contract, AD Eric Hyman said.

The 49-year-old Sumlin, who in 2012 led Texas A&M to its first top-5 finish in 56 seasons, is 19-5 in his two seasons with the Aggies. In his time at A&M, Sumlin helped groom Johnny Manziel into a Heisman Trophy winner last year and beat No. 1 Alabama in Tuscaloosa. Before Sumlin's arrival in College Station, the Aggies hadn't finished in the top 10 in 18 years.

Combining his time running the University of Houston program, Sumlin is 54-22 in six seasons as a head coach. In 2011, he led the Cougars to a school-record 12 wins. Last winter, Sumlin turned down opportunities for substantially more money from the NFL to remain at A&M.

Sumlin was considered to be the top target for Southern California in the wake of the Trojans firing coach Lane Kiffin earlier in the fall, according to sources.
 
Top