steph_harden
Superstar
Kyrie or Rozier?
Scary Terry is a blossoming star and is too good to play behind Kyrie going forward. So seems like a no brainer that the Celtics should see what they can get for Rozier....except for the fact that he's 4yrs younger, a better defender and has perfectly healthy knees.
So do you trade a young healthy stud with limitless potential?...whose game keeps rapidly improving? Or do you keep the super talented still young vet who has major injury milage and may or may not have many years left at an elite level?
Knowing the Celts they'd prob try to package Kyrie to get another superstar. But do you really do that? Kyrie is proven and who knows if Rozier will ever get to that level. And at the same time if Kyrie breaks down in a few years the Celts would look stupid as fukk for trading Rozier away.
Seems like a good problem to have doe
Scary Terry is a blossoming star and is too good to play behind Kyrie going forward. So seems like a no brainer that the Celtics should see what they can get for Rozier....except for the fact that he's 4yrs younger, a better defender and has perfectly healthy knees.

So do you trade a young healthy stud with limitless potential?...whose game keeps rapidly improving? Or do you keep the super talented still young vet who has major injury milage and may or may not have many years left at an elite level?
Knowing the Celts they'd prob try to package Kyrie to get another superstar. But do you really do that? Kyrie is proven and who knows if Rozier will ever get to that level. And at the same time if Kyrie breaks down in a few years the Celts would look stupid as fukk for trading Rozier away.
Seems like a good problem to have doe

...Rozier


Imagine kyrie and Hayward on some kobe and Pau shyt while Tatum/brown/Rozier still being big in contributing and Al doing Al
