Individualism & the Attack on African Identity

dat aint da same sandwich

links wid dem grits
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
1,607
Reputation
335
Daps
7,256
Reppin
NJ
Individualism & the Attack on African Identity - Hood Communist

69f22630d053bf80e23983ef8cf9d6fe.jpg


In 2021 it’s not difficult to find African (Black) people throughout the U.S. who will tell you with a straight face that they do not believe that they are descendants from Africa. Instead, these folks claim that their ancestry extends for thousands of years within the Western Hemisphere. The correct response to this perspective is “bless the good souls of these people because the cause behind their position is a complete lack of knowledge about Africa beyond what the capitalist system has force fed us for 500+ years”.

The diamond industry that produces the rings that people buy when getting engaged to be married, the gold people buy for their selected jewelry, etc., are propped up based on the exploitative industry of theft of those minerals from Africa. The aluminum that makes sporting rims for vehicles, not to mention foil to wrap our food in, derive from the exploitative bauxite industry in Africa. The production of the most desired and admired vehicles like Tesla, Mercedes Benz, BMW, etc., is based on exploiting Africa’s steel, zinc, lithium, and rubber resources. Also, the oil that provides the fuel for those vehicles is largely stolen from Africa. Even the simple enjoyment of a chocolate bar cannot happen without the exploitative cocoa industry which is based in Africa. This entire systemic apparatus of exploitation of all African resources was built from the colonization of Africa which began approximately 530 years ago. Before these brutal industries were established, the blueprint for this process was created through one of the worst holocausts in human history, the transatlantic slave trade. Literally millions of Africans were violently uprooted from Africa and displaced to the entire Western Hemisphere. The forced labor of these Africans provided the initial seed money that fueled the industrialization period. This period contributed to the development of the capitalist system that is represented by the multinational corporations like Nestle, Tesla, Chevrolet, Toyota, Shell, etc., that dominate all the exploitative industries previously mentioned.

These multi-national corporations have built their fortunes on mass murder and domination of the entire continent of Africa, but they will never publicly admit any of this. Instead, they have spent the last 500 years concocting a mass narrative that they are on top because of their hard work, focus, and undeniable belief in their God. This tactic has obviously been overwhelmingly successful for multiple reasons. The first reason is that this approach elevates the individualistic perspective of history; a perspective that capitalism depends upon to retain its dominant position. Once individualism is dominant, fantasy and the illusion of forward progress will always continue to be an effective tool because objective reality has been replaced with subjective desire and the hope of progress. What people wish the world was replaces what the world actually is, becoming the dominating reality. On top of all of this dysfunction, this individualistic model paints a lying portrait of Africa as a “dark continent” with primitive people, no technology, no civilization, and no hope. This backward vision of Africa contrasted with the vision of the capitalist Western world as the citadel of human progress and civilization has driven the masses of Africans in Africa, Europe, and the Western world to believe that they have to make a choice between the civilizations of the forces who have subjugated them and the poor suffering continent that, in their eyes, offers them nothing to be proud of. In this tainted scale, the capitalist world wins because it represents forward progress and all that is desired in the world. There is even a saying that “to this point, only capitalism has proven an ability to produce the products that advance the planet.”

All of the above is exactly why we are fond of asking Africans who claim not to be African to inform us about studies they have engaged in about our African history. Here there is always an oblivion. Not just a lack of knowledge, but the complete absence of any information about Africa whatsoever. Think about it. Even the most basic elements of history are denied to practically everyone who exists in the Western world. The average person, even those of African descent within the U.S. for example, could not provide you a reasonable answer to any one of the following questions: what is capitalism? Where did capitalism come from? What role did Africa play in the development of the Western world? What was the process for carrying out the slave trade? What did an average day for a captured African look like in the 1500s? 1600s? 1700s? 1800s? What did a typical day on the slave plantation look like? Where does your biological family exist in the world today? In what ways did we fight back? What examples of resistance do you know about? All of these questions will be met by 95% of the population with utter confusion and these are the basic questions required to have even a fundamental understanding of who we are. Without that foundation, any and everyone, no matter how intelligent, is forced to accept the narrative of our enemies and embrace a Western identity (even if they do so in any form of resistance i.e. “I’m Black only”) because this process has completely cut us off from who we actually are.

And, with no healthy foundation of who we are, we are not in the position to understand even the basic history of what great contributions Africa has contributed to human history. None of these non-African Africans can ever tell you a single thing about Africa’s unquestionable contributions to the development of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. None of them can tell you about our contributions to science, debate, and even our creation of the world’s first documented university (Timbuktu in Mali, West Africa). They don’t know that the Greek philosophers they have been taught to believe laid the table for world philosophy got their training at Timbuktu (and they even wrote about it). They know nothing of our matriarchal histories throughout Africa where women people were elevated without men being subjugated.

This complete cut off from Africa places us at the mercy of our colonial identities. As a result, we have come to view the world completely through the vision provided to us by these colonizers. We believe we are Black British, Afro-Cubans, Black Brazilians, Black-Canadians, African-Americans, Nigerians, Kenyans, etc. We see our interests as tied to the micro-states where we were born and where we live. Meanwhile, these micro-states have zero commitment to representing our interests, especially since they know that their continued prosperity is tied to the collective exploitation of Africa. So to them, we will forever be a threat to them, even if we don’t understand why (which we don’t) because they know that one day we will wake up and realize that the riches that they command come from the same place that we do.

African identity is much more than glamorizing our past. For proponents of Pan-Africanism it’s really a recognition that there are 2 billion Africans worldwide, living in 120 countries and in each of those countries we occupy the bottom of society. And, at the core of this is the continued subjugation of Africa.

The great thing about Pan-Africanism is that it acknowledges that an African can be Puerto Rican, Dominican, Brazilian, Canadian, etc., and still recognize that our core interest and progress as a people is intrinsically linked to the liberation of Africa. We would never wish to deny our experiences over the last 500+ years because our ability to survive despite the trauma we experienced is a badge of honor and a testament to the strength of our African culture which is without question the resource that has guided us through this hell we have experienced. What does that culture look like? When people say things like “what Black people do” really what they are saying is our refusal, conscious or unconscious, to change or compromise who we are is actually our African culture manifesting itself in ways that protect us. This has permitted us to survive as we have. Torn, beaten down sometimes. Confused, but still here and as a result, potentially ready to fight back.

That African culture has never left us, whether we know that or not is irrelevant. It’s always been here and we use it all day, every-day. Our culture is a collective one and that’s why the individualist approach has never worked for us and it never will. All that approach will do is confuse us into accepting the logic of our enemies that our problems are our fault as individuals— some individual failing that God is punishing us for because we are inferior. This is the basis of white supremacy which is the foundation of the capitalist system and we already told you where capitalism came from so clearly, none of this is healthy and productive for us to pursue.

It’s time for us to raise the bar. No talk about identity that isn’t accompanied by study and analysis of our history. It’s tragically unfortunate that people are paying these corporations like 23andme hundreds of dollars to tell them what we already know, that we are Africans. It’s tragically unfortunate that so many people, completely ignorant about who we are, feel the need to lie and make a history they cannot document instead of learning the true and glorious history of who we are. It’s tragically unfortunate that capitalism has reduced truth down to nothing more than a subjective interpretation that varies from individual to individual “based upon your truth being your truth.” This is absolute nonsense designed strictly to justify the injustices that are normalized as the natural order of things. We are Africans, period. Even Mother Nature knows this and any African who straightens their hair is reminded of this as soon as the elements of Earth hit that hair.
 

Flywin Lannister

Superstar
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
11,640
Reputation
1,639
Daps
40,545
Reppin
Lannister Bloodline
Tariq’s groupies won’t like this

ANY man who wants to divide Black people, and comes up with sub-groups and hates on one group, is doing the White man’s work

When a Black man does it’s either a c00n trying to fit in and gain favor with massa, or a paid agent.

Any Black man who somehow thinks “Africa” is bad or lower than “American Black” is a MOTHERfukkING FOOL programmed by white people, and doing what they want.

Divided, we are weak. United, we turn Africa into a world power, we create our own media conglomerates and we become powerful despite the White man.

They want us divided. If you’re Black and helping divide us.. you should really ask yourself why.. why would you ever divide us?
 

dat aint da same sandwich

links wid dem grits
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
1,607
Reputation
335
Daps
7,256
Reppin
NJ
Tariq’s groupies won’t like this

ANY man who wants to divide Black people, and comes up with sub-groups and hates on one group, is doing the White man’s work

When a Black man does it’s either a c00n trying to fit in and gain favor with massa, or a paid agent.

Any Black man who somehow thinks “Africa” is bad or lower than “American Black” is a MOTHERfukkING FOOL programmed by white people, and doing what they want.

Divided, we are weak. United, we turn Africa into a world power, we create our own media conglomerates and we become powerful despite the White man.

They want us divided. If you’re Black and helping divide us.. you should really ask yourself why.. why would you ever divide us?

That clown is a wave rider that can't be taken seriously. He just hustles and makes up different shyt every few months. Any intelligent person sees through his b.s.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
55,979
Reputation
15,394
Daps
207,763
Reppin
Above the fray.
Tariq’s groupies won’t like this

ANY man who wants to divide Black people, and comes up with sub-groups and hates on one group, is doing the White man’s work

When a Black man does it’s either a c00n trying to fit in and gain favor with massa, or a paid agent.

Any Black man who somehow thinks “Africa” is bad or lower than “American Black” is a MOTHERfukkING FOOL programmed by white people, and doing what they want.

Divided, we are weak. United, we turn Africa into a world power, we create our own media conglomerates and we become powerful despite the White man.

They want us divided. If you’re Black and helping divide us.. you should really ask yourself why.. why would you ever divide us?
That clown is a wave rider that can't be taken seriously. He just hustles and makes up different shyt every few months. Any intelligent person sees through his b.s.

At each step of that YTer's disinformation campaign, we refuted everything that his followers came here to regurgitate. People who hear,believe, and repeat that nonsense do so because they WANT to believe it, not because it adds up or makes sense.
They are not to be taken seriously, and I've added them to ignore list.
 

xoxodede

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
11,068
Reputation
9,260
Daps
51,652
Reppin
Michigan/Atlanta
I see what he is saying - but I don't see the issue in Black Americans -- or as some has said -- "American Blacks" -- identifying as such -- and their said culture/ethnic lineage. Identifying as such is not taking away from being of African descent, Pan-Africanism -- or anyone/anything else.

I don't approve of flat Blackness -- based off of being of African descent. Because, we all know it doesn't work like that -- and it shouldn't.

We can all be of African-Descent and be proud -- but we can also be proud of our separate ethnicities and lineages -which were created via the TAST and our ancestors experiences.

Trying to shame Black Americans under the guise of "Pan-Africanism" is silly and the agenda is clear as day. This has only become a topic since Black Americans/AA have acknowledged the necessity for an separate ethnic identity - which includes more than just being Black in race. It's not divisive - it's necessary and needed.

And I don't support Tariq -- nor his FBA -- and never have.
 
Last edited:

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
55,979
Reputation
15,394
Daps
207,763
Reppin
Above the fray.
I see what he is saying - but I don't see the issue in Black Americans -- or as some has said -- "American Blacks" -- identifying as such -- and their said culture/ethnic lineage. Identifying as such is not taking away from being of African descent, Pan-Africanism -- or anyone/anything else.

I don't approve of flat Blackness -- based off of being of African descent. Because, we all know it doesn't work like that -- and it shouldn't.

We can all be of African-Descent and be proud -- but we can also be proud of our separate ethnicities and lineages -which were created via the TAST and our ancestors experiences.

Trying to shame Black Americans under the guise of "Pan-Africanism" is silly and the agenda is clear as day. This has only become a topic since Black Americans/AA have acknowledged the necessity for an separate ethnic identity - which includes more than just being Black in race. It's not divisive - it's necessary and needed.

And I don't support Tariq -- nor his FBA -- and never have.

The author seems to be expressing sentiments that other AAs have said/written publicly for nearly a century. He's from the Bay Area with Louisiana roots. Others from that same migration pattern, including many of the Black Panthers....were saying close to what he's saying in the 1960s.
Before them, Malcolm X , and since then several activists and academics from here.

This is not new.


The author applies his viewpoint to all groups of Black people, including African nationalities.

This complete cut off from Africa places us at the mercy of our colonial identities. As a result, we have come to view the world completely through the vision provided to us by these colonizers. We believe we are Black British, Afro-Cubans, Black Brazilians, Black-Canadians, African-Americans, Nigerians, Kenyans, etc
 

dat aint da same sandwich

links wid dem grits
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
1,607
Reputation
335
Daps
7,256
Reppin
NJ
I see what he is saying - but I don't see the issue in Black Americans -- or as some has said -- "American Blacks" -- identifying as such -- and their said culture/ethnic lineage. Identifying as such is not taking away from being of African descent, Pan-Africanism -- or anyone/anything else.

I don't approve of flat Blackness -- based off of being of African descent. Because, we all know it doesn't work like that -- and it shouldn't.

We can all be of African-Descent and be proud -- but we can also be proud of our separate ethnicities and lineages -which were created via the TAST and our ancestors experiences.

Trying to shame Black Americans under the guise of "Pan-Africanism" is silly and the agenda is clear as day. This has only become a topic since Black Americans/AA have acknowledged the necessity for an separate ethnic identity - which includes more than just being Black in race. It's not divisive - it's necessary and needed.

And I don't support Tariq -- nor his FBA -- and never have.

That's not what he's doing at all and this isn't a new topic.
 

DaRealness

I think very deeply
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
16,343
Reputation
4,461
Daps
69,453
Reppin
LDN
Excellent article.

That clown is a wave rider that can't be taken seriously. He just hustles and makes up different shyt every few months. Any intelligent person sees through his b.s.

At each step of that YTer's disinformation campaign, we refuted everything that his followers came here to regurgitate. People who hear,believe, and repeat that nonsense do so because they WANT to believe it, not because it adds up or makes sense.
They are not to be taken seriously, and I've added them to ignore list.

Basically. There's a lot I could say about that fool but he isn't worth the energy.

I don't even click on certain threads now because I already know what's being said and by who. I got a lot of them on ignore too so I wouldn't see half those posts anyway.
 

dat aint da same sandwich

links wid dem grits
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
1,607
Reputation
335
Daps
7,256
Reppin
NJ
Excellent article.





Basically. There's a lot I could say about that fool but he isn't worth the energy.

I don't even click on certain threads now because I already know what's being said and by who. I got a lot of them on ignore too so I wouldn't see half those posts anyway.

Yup.
 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,427
Reputation
4,333
Daps
82,557
I see what he is saying - but I don't see the issue in Black Americans -- or as some has said -- "American Blacks" -- identifying as such -- and their said culture/ethnic lineage. Identifying as such is not taking away from being of African descent, Pan-Africanism -- or anyone/anything else.

I don't approve of flat Blackness -- based off of being of African descent. Because, we all know it doesn't work like that -- and it shouldn't.

We can all be of African-Descent and be proud -- but we can also be proud of our separate ethnicities and lineages -which were created via the TAST and our ancestors experiences.

Trying to shame Black Americans under the guise of "Pan-Africanism" is silly and the agenda is clear as day. This has only become a topic since Black Americans/AA have acknowledged the necessity for an separate ethnic identity - which includes more than just being Black in race. It's not divisive - it's necessary and needed.

And I don't support Tariq -- nor his FBA -- and never have.
You hit the nail on the head. Do not allow them to gaslight you.

This is nothing but a pan-Africanist hit piece designed to demonize the unique experiences of black Americans and gaslight them to conform under a pan-Africanist mindset.

This so-called “hood communist” should be more concerned with the rise of pan-Africanist thought as it relates to educated African immigrants migrating to places like the United States and dominating academics. In addition to becoming incredibly successful due to their economic and cultural capital that allowed them to game this current system of capitalism.

It almost seems entirely convenient that what was once considered “Black” is now “African” - especially in regard to revolutionary thought. It almost makes African immigrants immune to criticism and demonizes the unique experiences and perspectives of black Americans.

And the Pan-Africanist mindset is incredibly surface level and downright ignorant. There’s zero nuance in that way of thinking. Africa is not some otherworldly paradise the way it is regarded so.

It is the largest continent on the planet. It’s ultimately an empty statement to say that we are all vaguely “African.” Black Americans were the victims of chattel slavery that happened in the Americans - it is pretty much impossible to trace our heritage back to even a specific ethnic group in Africa. We have zero ties to Africa, considering we cannot even find a country in Africa to decisively trace our lineage back to. That is the key distinction - that is our identity. One that is uniquely ours - uniquely black.

We are not “African” - we are black. That may seem like a controversial statement taken out of context and at surface level. But we did not simply have our culture ripped from us - we created a new one.

The same way a person from a tribe in South Africa and a tribe Timbuktu are not “African” in terms of identity. They are separated by thousands of years of cultural development and most likely never crossed path organically in human history. The author of that posts argues the Black American mindset as a product of white supremacy - but to what degree is ascribing all people who come from the largest landmass on the planet “African” (a EUROPEAN WORD btw)?? Is that not the product of WHITE SUPREMACY to group an entire continent together and ascribe characteristics to them??? Co-opted by those who benefit from a Pan-Africanism to mask the extreme complexities, nuance, and corruption in the continent?

To what degree is the average black American related to (let’s use an extreme example here) a wealthy Igbo individual attending Harvard University, who is a direct descendant of a slave trader. Yet considered just as black as their poor Black American classmate who is the product an uneducated single parent living below the poverty line?

Now before someone quotes me out of context, this extreme example is used to reflect the extreme difference between two people who would both be considered “African” by pan-Africanists and black by a capitalist system of white supremacy.

Pan-Africanism is not true liberation, it is simply supremacy and subjugation by another name.
 
Last edited:

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
83,233
Reputation
12,170
Daps
225,578
I'm glad that black people who are ADOS and Immigrant alike are tackling this issue, constructively, together.
 
Top