Instagram bans Alex Jones, Milo, Loomer, and Farrakhan

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,835
Daps
88,334
Reppin
nWg
Was Farrakhan stunting for the Gram? Was he taking a lot of trips to Dubai? :heh:

lead_720_405.jpg


Instagram and Facebook Ban Far-Right Extremists

In an effort to contain misinformation and extremism that has increasingly spread across the platform, Instagram has banned several prominent right-wing extremists.

Specifically, Instagram and its parent company, Facebook, have banned Alex Jones, Infowars, Milo Yiannopoulos, Paul Joseph Watson, Laura Loomer, Paul Nehlen, and Louis Farrakhan under their policies against dangerous individuals and organizations.


Infowars is subject to the strictest ban. Any account that shares Infowars content will see the content removed; if an account violates terms on multiple occasions it will be banned. Facebook and Instagram will remove any content containing Infowars videos, radio segments, or articles, and Facebook will remove any Groups set up to share Infowars content and Events promoting any of the banned extremist figures, according to a company spokesperson. (Twitter, YouTube, and Apple have also banned Alex Jones and Infowars.)

Read: Jack Dorsey’s dangerous defense of Alex Jones

Jones, Yiannopoulos, Watson, Loomer, Nehlen, and Farrakhan are all personally banned, as are any accounts set up in their likenesses. But users may still praise those figures on Instagram or share content related to them that doesn't violate other Instagram and Facebook terms of service. “We've always banned individuals or organizations that promote or engage in violence and hate, regardless of ideology. The process for evaluating potential violators is extensive and it is what led us to our decision to remove these accounts today," a Facebook spokesperson said over email.

Jones, he and other extremists have found a welcome home on Instagram, where they've garnered hundreds of thousands of followers, making the platform fertile ground for conspiracy theories, misinformation, and extremist thought. As The Atlanticreported in March, right-wing meme pages such as @the_typical_liberal and @unclesamsmisguidedchildren share Infowars content via IGTV, Instagram's longform video hub. @the_typical_liberal, has posted several videos and images claiming proof that the Christchurch, New Zealand, shooting was a "false flag." Other Instagram accounts the platform suggested falsely claim that Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey is secretly connected to the Clintons, who feed baby blood to George Soros, and that a new bill would “engrave Planned Parenthood’s abortion number” onto the back of all student-ID cards for girls over the age of 12.


The company has also failed to crack down on anti-vaccine content despite repeated promises to limit its reach. In March, The Atlantic found that a quarter of the top posts on the #vaccines hashtag contained anti-vaccine messaging. And more than two months later, a Business Insider investigation found that anti-vaccination hashtags and memes are still thriving on the platform.

Read: Instagram is the internet’s new home for hate

Josh Russell, a misinformation and extremism expert, posted a Twitter thread on Wednesday outlining all the ways Instagram has failed to contain Russian misinformation campaigns. Instagram has become the IRA's "go-to" social network, according to Wired, and in the lead-up to the 2018 midterms thousands of Americans were following Russian-backed accounts intent on sowing division. "A lot of current right wing instagram accounts listed russian instagram accounts as partners in their posts and you can use that to run across tons of stuff made by the russians still on IG right now," Russell tweeted.


Simply by following Instagram's suggestions Russell was recommended 240 Instagram pages posting misinformation. Looking at one Qanon page resulted in suggestions for 12 more. Liking and engaging with even borderline content on the platform results in recommendations for more extreme content. Just last week Instagram recommended I follow Yiannopoulos and Jones after I liked and followed many right-wing meme pages. Russell also noted that more than 30 white nationalist pages flagged to Facebook and Instagram last month are also still up. "One would think that Instagram would bother to halfway try to clean this stuff up," he tweeted, "but it's all still there."

Banning these extremist figures is a step toward stricter moderation of extremist views, but time and again, we’ve seen that the internet’s worst actors always find new ways to exploit platforms. For instance, after Instagram promised to ban anti-vaccine hashtags like #vaccinescauseautism, anti-vaxxers simply developed new hashtags by changing a letter or adding a word.

Facebook announced an entire redesign of the platform focusing on Groups, in an effort to give users more private spaces. Facebook is "using people's understandable anger over the company playing fast and loose with their personal data to push a 'privacy' focus which is just a fancy way to hide the other big problem on the platform and evade journalists and watchdogs," the NBC journalist Brandy Zadrozny tweeted upon Facebook's Groups announcement. "There are very nice groups… but some are also very very dangerous and make the world worse." One recent investigation found dozens of Facebook groups dedicated to the Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Joining just one of those groups resulted in recommendations for more conspiracy-theory groups.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,282
Daps
115,949
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
I told yall what was going happen verbatim. I tried to warn yall that silencing a voice like A. Jones by multiple platforms at once was going to lead to voices like Farrakhan being censored too....fihttps://www.thecoli.com/search/15667150/

Matterfact, I alluded specifically to A.Jones and Farrakhan connection about 23 times ..:laff:. https://www.thecoli.com/search/15666836/?q=farrakhan+jones&o=relevance&c[user][0]=1187 banning A. Jones was canary in the coal mine of digital censorshipto to ban Farrakhan and anyone else that has an opinion about anything that impacts agendas or investments.

:sas1:
 
Last edited:

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,545
Daps
82,049
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
nobody cares that your racist white daddy got banned

I told yall what was going happen verbatim. I tried to warn yall that silencing a voice like A. Jones by multiplplatfirms at once was goi g ro lead to voices like Farrakhan being censored too....fihttps://www.thecoli.com/search/15667150/

Matterfact, I alluded specifically to A.Jones and Farrakhan censorship connection about 23 times ..:laff:. https://www.thecoli.com/search/15666836/?q=farrakhan+jones&o=relevance&c[user][0]=1187 banning A. Jones was canary in the coal mine of digital censorshipto to ban Farrakhan and anyone else that has an opinion about anything.

:sas1:
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,835
Daps
88,334
Reppin
nWg
I tried to warn yall
But you said nothing for years as Jones and others were on these platforms. YEARS went by as they used these companies to promote themselves. Things only changed when these companies realized these loons were hurting their bottom line. This isn't censorship, it's the bouncer in the bar deciding the crazy drunk has to leave.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,282
Daps
115,949
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
nobody cares that your racist white daddy got banned

Nah, I just recognize the power of the speech, and what pundits are speaking their mind to the fullest.

But you care now that Farrakgan got banned huh?? :sas2:

Even though I explained he was going to get banned, because A. Jones was the main target of free speech. If he goes down everybody else goes down.

You care now huh?, :jawalrus:.

My point from the beginning was all this celebratuon of Jones getting banned off of 40 websites, platforms, etc in like a 3 months time was unprecedented. It was sending a message that speech will be regulated by powerful entities......anybody's speech they disagree would/could get the same treatment....that was and is still my point. Farrakhan is one of those powerful influentisl voices, so it was obvious, people like him, would be next.

Just say "Newworldafro, you were right, I should actually not celebrate censorship. Thanks for making me see the light of why censorship is bad for everyone".
 
Last edited:

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,545
Daps
82,049
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
but that's not censorship

:umad:and I actually get Final Call newspapers, so try again.


Nah, I just recognize the power of the speech, and what pundits are speaking their mind to the fullest.

But you care now that Farrakgan got banned huh?? :sas2:

Even though I explained he was going to get banned, because A. Jones was the main target of free speech. If ge goes down everybody else goes down.

You care now huh?, :jawalrus:.

My point from the beginning qas all this celwbratuon of Jobes getting banned off of 40 websires, platforms, etc in like a 3 months timevwas unprecedented. It was sending a message that speech will be regulated by the powerful entities......anybody's aoeech they disagree....that was and is still my point. Farrakhan is one of those poweful voices, so it was obvious, peopke like him, would be next.

Just say "Newworldafro, you were right, I should actually not celebrate censorship. Thanks for making mevsee the light of why censorship is bad for everyone".
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,282
Daps
115,949
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
But you said nothing for years as Jones and others were on these platforms. YEARS went by as they used these companies to promote themselves. Things only changed when these companies realized these loons were hurting their bottom line. This isn't censorship, it's the bouncer in the bar deciding the crazy drunk has to leave.

What are you talking about? :gucci:
I've been talking about censorship in general since 2012 on this website. Go check. :dahell:

Jokers just can't admit they were wrong for years. Throwing anything and hoping it sticks. :scust:
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,282
Daps
115,949
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
@ADevilYouKhow come down to the ring and express yourself.

"Nazi"?? :dahell:

Elaborate?

I'm just talking about censorship and why it's bad. Nazis held book burnings.
I'm saying stop digital book burnings.
So which poster(s) are more "Nazi-like"?
:jbhmm:

Come on down and dialogue. :mjlit:
 
Top