Is Anarchy the only thing truly capable of changing the current political system?

[gho3st]

The same movie gets played every four year: Different actors, same roles, same investors. shyt I aint even follow the last election because i know how it would turn out. I knew the talking points and anticipated how the public would react. What I'm asking is how long will the people accept the 2 party system where they get to pick between 2 fatally flawed candidates. You got no choice but to pick a bad candidate. I remember during an election a few years back, a politician said "you should vote for this candidate because he wont do as much damage!".


Lets not even talk about how there's no limit to Congress members' terms or how Supreme Court justices gets to serve until they either retire or die.

 

[ill]

Yes. Anarchy resets the power at the top. Anything else just replaced one power with another similar power.

 

[Crakface]

Historically only one thing changes the political system and thats a lot of people dying.

Anarchy is at best what happens when a government and law falls apart. As a form of government, you're outta your mind because there will always be people that will band together and form a power base and then force other people to bend to their will because they have the manpower, capital and resources to do so. Government is always going to exist. Always.

 

[Liquid]

I've been saying this for years.

We can complain about things all we want, but if it doesn't reach that boiling point things will just remain the same with different heads at the top

 

[MenacingMonk]

Anarchy will lead to a police state and I doubt we win. There needs to be a people's army if we want a shot.

Of course anarchy will never happen since America is lazy and loves the wool over their eyes.

 

[Spoonz]

Nope anarchy never works because people are too stupid

 

[Crakface]

Nope anarchy never works because people are too stupid

Anarchy works its just a shytty way to live life when you live in a nation where you can pretty much have access to whatever you want.

 

[88m3]

Why don't we rely on God?

 

[Shogun]

The current state of things isn't much different than the way things have always been.

Plus, people are too spoiled to live in anarchy. Take away most of these arm-chair revolutionary's hot water for a week, and they'd gladly invite Hitler into the Oval Office to get it back.

 

[theworldismine13]

 

[A Real Human Bean]

Historically only one thing changes the political system and thats a lot of people dying.

Anarchy is at best what happens when a government and law falls apart. As a form of government, you're outta your mind because there will always be people that will band together and form a power base and then force other people to bend to their will because they have the manpower, capital and resources to do so. Government is always going to exist. Always.

Anarchy generally isn't a rejection of all government. It's more of a situation where any person or group claiming authority over another has to reasonably justify it to the people, and if they can't then they're removed and replaced. It also involves varying degrees of worker control over production and work.

You guys should read Homage to Catalonia by George Orwell for a realistic idea of how a future anarchist society might be organized and ran. It's about the anarchist community in Spain during the Spanish Civil War.

 

[Marvel]

The political parties work together to give the citizens an a illusion of division and fair politics. People like the us vs them, they like division and conflict. Its a great distraction for those that really run the US and for that manner the rest of the world. There is not one group in this country that is technically casted away from both parties for this reason. Casting away any group can lead to an insurrection which is what happened in the 60s with so-called blacks which is not good for business. That is how the Edomites lost some control over South Africa. They gain more by acting inclusive, in that way they can gain c00ns to serve them. If you still think that this politics is actually genuine on either side...you are fool right where you stand.

 

[Crakface]

Anarchy generally isn't a rejection of all government. It's more of a situation where any person or group claiming authority over another has to reasonably justify it to the people, and if they can't then they're removed and replaced. It also involves varying degrees of worker control over production and work.

You guys should read Homage to Catalonia by George Orwell for a realistic idea of how a future anarchist society might be organized and ran. It's about the anarchist community in Spain during the Spanish Civil War.

Ok. So basically anarchy is what happens when leaders make people eat shyt until they vomit. Its a natural restructuring of humanity after which a new group of people take power until they fukk it up and history repeats itself.

Over and over again, Forever.

I just hate those morons that think anarchy is some legitimate sustainable form of government.

 

[Shogun]

dlt