Is Five Titles in 16 Years A Dynasty?

[Majestic Pape]

Oh it's definitely a dynasty...Pop been turning boys to men since Bel Biv Devoe

And as we see...now he has Another Bad Creation in Kawhi Leonard

Stop it.

 

[Rakim Allah]

Call it what you want they've been the most consistently dominant basketball team during that time span as evidence by championships in 3 different decades, to me their run over a 16 year period is more impressive than a single 3-peat

two different repeats(one 3 peat) is more impressive during that time span. Spurs run is very impressive nonetheless.

 

[Primetime21]

two different repeats(one 3 peat) is more impressive during that time span. Spurs run is very impressive nonetheless.

Ok.

 

[NY's #1 Draft Pick]

They're not a dynasty... They're a legacy

 

[boskey]

Oh it's definitely a dynasty...Pop been turning boys to men since Bel Biv Devoe

And as we see...now he has Another Bad Creation in Kawhi Leonard

at the Biv 10 Records entendres. I won't ask how..

 

[Profane]

thats a dynasty brehs. and lets not act the spurs weren't legit title contenders from 2007+

 

[bl2k8]

The Spurs were not legit title contenders from 2008-2011 because that other team out west was killin shyt.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

I wish Manu never fouled Dirk so they would've 3 peated and this wouldn't be a discussion.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

and how many finals APPEARANCES fam?

 

[Mensch Fontana]

thats a dynasty brehs. and lets not act the spurs weren't legit title contenders from 2007+

the 5 in 11 years by the lakers isnt considered a dynasty, its two different eras, so by no means the 5 in 16 even close to being a dynasty