Thats such an oversimplification. I can say the exact same thing about women.You generally want the perks of chivalry and equality at the same time, not understanding that chivalry was a direct consequence of a social structure in which women were submissive (women being bought from father to husband). Nothing wrong with chivalry, but women these days will with a straight face claim that: "we should have equal pay, but men should spoil women with gifts, groceries, gas and dates. Women shouldn't cook for bae though, that's wife-duties.". Another example is the "real men dates single women"-thing. Notice how fukk boy has gone from describing a man who only thinks with his dikk (fukking up his money and/or family because he couldn't controll his urges), to every guy who doesn't do what women wants them to do. In 2016 a fukk boy is a man who doesn't want to marry a girl who likes him, and a thot is a girl who is out of a man's league so he has to berate her. Those terms, along with ho, bytch etc., has completely lost their meaning. Both genders have what you call "man logic".
The fact of the matter is that most regular men couldn't be thots if they wanted to. It's only the top echelon of men who has access to many women, which actually makes it a high status trait. Most women can get laid anytime, so for them virtue lies in being able to lock down the few high status males in their vicinity. I agree with what has already been posted - a man giving out his attention, time and money to any and every woman will be disrespected by the opposite sex in the end. As will a woman who gives her body to any and every man.
edit: I fully support women being promiscuous, I just wouldn't personally marry a woman like that.