Is it best for business for Brock Lesnar to Go Over Tonight

Dreamzeedream

Banned
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
12,098
Reputation
-1,186
Daps
15,298
Reppin
NULL
:patrice: I doubt Goldberg would do the Job in a Return and "Last Match"


:patrice: or will Shane cost him the match which would set up Brock Vs Shane at WM or the next PPV
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
126,738
Reputation
9,049
Daps
150,174
Reppin
Westcoast
It's true..it's not corny. It's the paradox of the choice they made. Had Roman turned heel at WM 31, we could of moved on to other shyt but they kept him a face and he's still suffering till this very day. Out of touch. So that's why Lesnar has to keep winning..they took the Taker streak and didn't pass it on.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
74,689
Reputation
13,617
Daps
262,367
Reppin
206 & 734
Not really. The first person to beat Brock clean (post Taker) would get a good rub.
Anyone who has ever beat brock lesnar gets a good rub...the taker win isnt a shine that is new to brock....

Brock was the only choice to beat taker because of how credible he is and it needed to happen eventually...and they had heat leading to it

Brock went on TO KILL CENA in a way never seen before, win the belt, and it was credible...why? Because he just beat taker....and he went away WITH the belt, adding even more credibilty

The idea that brock cant lose at this point is just fukkin stupid, and him losing to someone OVER TWO YEARS after the streak 'wasting' it, is just, absurd.
 
Top