The fact that the only time in my life i have seen an actual Native American is during a 3rd grade assembly lets me know this is a foolish topic. Let that sink in, we had assemblies to show people Native Americans arent fiction.
Is the Native American Struggle = or > than the African American Struggle?
- Thread starter ROFL_GUY
- Start date
I WAS talking to a bunch of idiots. And I wasn't painting any picture. People assumed that I was implying that becaue they are too emotional and misinformed on the situation. My post wasn't to place the blame on anyone just giving some history that apparently most of you had no clue about.
U gotta check out the main reason for the indians dying and if u know the meaning of genocide it doesn't fit on a large scale....disease and mutual war doesn't really count as genocide.
So white people killing all the buffalo specifically because the Native Americans needed it to survive doesn't count as a method of genocide? They used to hand passengers of trains guns to shoot them as they traveled across the country.
am not going to count mutual war for the most since part they had lived for couple of hundreds of years fine, yea they were probably wars but they weren't wiping themselves out in super large #s , so you saying disease brought in by white ppl not white mass murder wiped out anywhere from 5-10 million native Americans?
Nah that's considered a method of warfare to either starve them off or force them to move off the land....the train shyt is cacs having fun out there cacin and bein azzholes who didn't like indians on "there" land and the fact they were killing other white people to defend themself
There would be no meetings,treaties and land offers made to indians to relocate if the goal wuz to just kill native americans off....so many of them died from diseases they couldn't survive there really wuz no need to just kill them all..
*cac makes thread about two races of people that have been oppressed by his ancestors
* pin both against each other
*fukkery ensues
works every fukkin time
* pin both against each other
*fukkery ensues
works every fukkin time
]Nah that's considered a method of warfare to either starve them off or force them to move off the land[/B]....the train shyt is cacs having fun out there cacin and bein azzholes who didn't like indians on "there" land and the fact they were killing other white people to defend themself
There would be no meetings,treaties and land offers made to indians to relocate if the goal wuz to just kill native americans off....so many of them died from diseases they couldn't survive there really wuz no need to just kill them all..
So starving people, forcing them to move to barren land, and then killing all their food on the way to the barren land isnt good enough for you to call it genocide?
Bruh the train shyt wasnt just for fun. They had a saying "One dead buffalo is one dead indian", so then they went out to kill as many buffalo as humanly possible.
They coexisted becuz the Indians weren't in the way at the time....the fact they coexisted is probaly what kept the indians from just being slaughtered but instead rounded up and moved if they agreed.....when the plan is genocide u don't help the people u killing pack they bags and go sumwhere else
And if I remember the black plague right it killed a helluva lot more than 5 to 10 million people....fact is a lot of Indians died during the period where we say they "coexisted"....indians wuz dyin off back then and just didn't know why they wuz dying,they didn't know the white mans diseases wuz killin them off in rapid numbers...those first couple hundred years u thinkin it wuz all fine,a lot of Indians died during that time...by the the time they started clashin the Indians numbers wuz already flabby and sick compared to what they were when white people got there with they disease.
U believe muskets and swords killed 10 million capable indian warriors but not that disease could? I'm not downplayin it cuz its still the white mans fault,and technically slaverys not genocide either....I'm just bein technical,mass murder still ain't any better...think we can agree white people are horrible and just leave it at that
They coexisted becuz the Indians weren't in the way at the time....the fact they coexisted is probaly what kept the indians from just being slaughtered but instead rounded up and moved if they agreed.....when the plan is genocide u don't help the people u killing pack they bags and go sumwhere else
And if I remember the black plague right it killed a helluva lot more than 5 to 10 million people....fact is a lot of Indians died during the period where we say they "coexisted"....indians wuz dyin off back then and just didn't know why they wuz dying,they didn't know the white mans diseases wuz killin them off in rapid numbers...those first couple hundred years u thinkin it wuz all fine,a lot of Indians died during that time...by the the time they started clashin the Indians numbers wuz already flabby and sick compared to what they were when white people got there with they disease.
U believe muskets and swords killed 10 million capable indian warriors but not that disease could? I'm not downplayin it cuz its still the white mans fault,and technically slaverys not genocide either....I'm just bein technical,mass murder still ain't any better...think we can agree white people are horrible and just leave it at that
do you know what genocide means?! Since i was adopted, i have no idea what % i am.. Does anyone know the minimum % to be adopted by reservations in cali?? I could be 1% or 99%
i have no idea 
*cac makes thread about two races of people that have been oppressed by his ancestors
* pint both against each other
*fukkery ensues
works every fukkin time
they don't hear you though
YaThreadFloppedB!
The Patron Saint of Threads
.. they might be the most fukked off race of people on this earth!
