Is there a fine line to pro-blackness in the media?

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,128
Daps
641,726
Reppin
The Deep State
I won't suggest anything about respectability politics, and I won't tell anyone to hold their tongues. We need truth-tellers and people who aren't afraid to bring certain conversations to the mainstream to push narratives that benefit us.

But you know who I think is fukking it up?

The smug loud ones.

Theres a difference between Corey Holcomb, and...say your random twitter "super woke" intersectional critical race-theorist blah blah blah

See, when I hear Corey talk, its always about equality and fairness. Corey rarely talks about black supremacy though. Thats something I think that gets lost. Tariq too.

Yet, sometimes when you hear some of these super woke types, its like they're so steeped in the "awareness" they're just actively aiming to shyt on everyone to the point where jokes about "white tears" ultimately backfire.

White people are definitely waking up to what they feel is a double standard. And I think what hurts the people who are sincere about improving race relations is their inability to have non-emotional dialog. These critical-race-theory types are WAY too emotional to represent us sometimes. This doesn't help anyone when you're talking to white audiences and they use that emotion to empower themselves to stifle any advances we might have gained in the public sphere.

This is the problem with letting "certain types" lead the Black Lives Matter movement IMO. The problem isn't that BLM exists, its that the leaders are not really rooted in advancement from a stoic mind. They're interested more in being flashy and annoying. They're not interested in political engagement or the hard work of infrastructural reform.

It all comes off like one big performance piece. Dancing? Singing? Chants? Its like they want hugs and praise, not to do actual business.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not a conservative. I'm definitely a liberal person, but a lot of the ultra-liberals are fukking it up with this desire to just keep prodding the low-hanging fruit. Theres a difference between having your rainbow hair and catch-phrases...and showing up with a team of people who are well researched, unemotional, and have paperwork and policy to discuss. And they're not dressed like clowns.

Theres guys out here who are building businesses, getting advanced degrees, hiring others, etc. who really have more of a long-view and invested stake in changing the plight of black people in this country. And it seems they get flooded out by flamboyant types with catchy slogans, colorful t-shirts, and social media slang. The latter seems to just trigger white people, ironically.

I like the show Black-ish...I love it actually. Its hilarious to me. But then I always wonder...are we poking the bear here? I mean, theres one thing to push for equality of representation, but is this the BEST way to do it? Do we have to be so overt? Cause we all know they won't hesitate to snatch this shyt up the moment it all goes wrong.

I had to realize this when people were so surprised by the arrival of the Alt-Right into the mainstream. Theres a silent majority out here who will eat lunch with you, buy your round of beers, and even let your kids play together...and they will still support guys like Richard Spencer, or Milo, or stefan molyneux, or Gavin mcinnes with views on their youtube pages, podcasts, and social media follows.

Theres a give and take to this. We move 3 steps to the left, they try and move 5 to the right.

Is there a way to move more silently?









I say this to say...if we're 12% of the population, theres ultimately a way to over-play your hand if you're not smart enough to tailor and temper some of the talking points we use to advance our plight.

Everyone thinks that having a voice is enough. Its not. And frankly, we gotta tell a lot of these arrogant over-woke types to relax. They're fukking it up for those really trying to make waves out here.

If you see how the democrats are treating the post-election land-scape, they're leaving "identity politics" behind because they remember that theres still a majority of people who ultimately feel they weren't catered to.

If we want to be catered to, we're gonna have to leave some of these people who are more interested in play-time alone.

I'm not saying to vote republican (I could probably never do it...they're just fukking awful people) but I'm saying that we gotta stop elevating some of these boisterous "woke-for-the-moment" types.

They're annoying us with their cringeworthy hot-takes on blogs, their stupid twitter threads, and their half-assed social reform initiatives.





White supremacy is chess and a lot of people are treating this shyt like minesweeper.
 

Meta Reign

I walk the streets like, ''say something, n!gga!''
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
3,224
Reputation
-3,606
Daps
6,601
Reppin
Franklin ave.
Brehs take a look around. . .

Remember a few years back when the movements were occupy wall street and Ron Paul's liberty movement?

You can say what you want about both of those movements but they were grass roots. They were filled with honest people with specific and UNEMOTIONAL intentions. They were against eachother in some respects but had a lot of crossover ideas.

Fast forward to today. . . Both of those movements are gone and are now replaced with BLM and Antifa. This "alt right" bs has taken attention away from the Libertarian leaning liberty movement.

These are ultra emotional movements with mainstream support. . . Why is that? It's because these are movements that pose ZERO threat to the establishment. They are a bunch of kids who have no philosophical or ideological backing to their actions or words.

The elites are socially engineering us to become super emotional and kill eachother while they continue to rape us.

Is it not obvious?
 

BocaRear

The World Is My Country, To Do Good Is My Religion
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
13,740
Reputation
6,525
Daps
78,736
Brehs take a look around. . .

Remember a few years back when the movements were occupy wall street and Ron Paul's liberty movement?

You can say what you want about both of those movements but they were grass roots. They were filled with honest people with specific and UNEMOTIONAL intentions. They were against eachother in some respects but had a lot of crossover ideas.

Fast forward to today. . . Both of those movements are gone and are now replaced with BLM and Antifa. This "alt right" bs has taken attention away from the Libertarian leaning liberty movement.

These are ultra emotional movements with mainstream support. . . Why is that? It's because these are movements that pose ZERO threat to the establishment. They are a bunch of kids who have no philosophical or ideological backing to their actions or words.

The elites are socially engineering us to become super emotional and kill eachother while they continue to rape us.

Is it not obvious?

The Libertarianism movement, in the American sense, was developed by the rich to help make them even wealthier.

You're being hoodwinked into believing that libertarianism actually benefits you.

These type of scum believe that businesses should be allowed to discriminate people according to race/religion/sexuality.

The Great Libertarian Hoax: The Rich Get Richer and the Rest of Us Get Zero . . . Zilch . . . Nada

The libertarian movement in the US was invented just after World War II when a group of industrial and financial giants founded the Foundation for Economic Education. The FEE is viewed as the first think tank promotion a pro-business ideology called libertarianism.

Take a look at those facts again:

  • Libertarianism is a pro-business ideology made up by rich men.
  • The FEE’s board included the future founder of the John Birch Society, Robert Welch among other prominent right-wingers.
  • Milton Friedman, another god of the libertarians, was a real estate lobbyist in Chicago
  • The Austrian School of Economics became the totally unregulated free market economic model.
  • These became the key players in what the Kochs call “libertarian-infused conservatism.
Libertarians are fukking parasites and support the same old trickle down shyt
 

BocaRear

The World Is My Country, To Do Good Is My Religion
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
13,740
Reputation
6,525
Daps
78,736
Yeah some of these pro-black woke on twitter are embarrassing at times; but in general I have no qualms with any of their shyt.

The idea that the alt right is a response to the "SJW" phenomenon is wrong tho. Nobody is "poking the bear".

The alt right movement developed from the Pick up artist community, the red pill community, the anti feminist gamer gate community and the white supremacist community.

The alt-right considers anybody who isn't a white supremacist an SJW.

The root of the Alt right is inadequacy and fear.
Imagine being raised in the dominant society and seeing a minority as your president for 8 years. Seeing your women lust after supposedly inferior races. Losing jobs to those you consider less than you.

That's fundamentally what the alt right is about. It's white people who have never before had to compete for anything now in dreadful fear that they're "losing their country". They orchestrate this victim complex of white genocide and pseudo biological race realist shyt to justify their, essentially, feels over reals attitude.

Ironically they're SJW in their own right except their idea of social justice is white supremacy.
 
Top