Thanks for bumping the thread and keeping the information relevant.
You should tag your favorite Japanese c00n to help you spread the Israeli hasbara
Israel Air Strikes Palestinian Refugee Camp In Lebanon
- Thread starter Seoul Gleou
- Start date
You should tag your favorite Japanese c00n to help you spread the Israeli hasbara
YOU SHOULD GET DEEZ NUTS OF YA CHIN
"HASBARA" JUST A REPLACEMENT WORD FOR "I GOT NO RESPONSE TO FACTS"
DONT FORGET I SEEN YOUR IG PAGE MUFUCCA
THAT JIHADIST INDOCTRINATION IS HEAVY WITH U
He posts his source and you post yours, which outlet is telling the whole story?
CONSIDERING HIS SOURCE (AL JAZEERA) WORKS DIRECTLY WITH HAMAS TO PERPETUATE ANTI JEWISH PROPAGANDA, I THINK ITS PRETTY OBVIOUS LOL
A NAZIS JOB IS TO SPREAD PROPAGANDA AGAINST JEWS WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT U DO
AL JAZEERA IS SO CORRUPTED BY HAMAS THAT EVEN THE PLO BANNED THEM IN THE WEST BANK LMAO
IF U WANT NATIONALIST NEWS I GOT U THERE TOO
Israel strikes Hezbollah sites in Lebanon | The Jerusalem Post
The IDF's Arabic language spokesperson warned that the IDF will soon strike what it believes is Hezbollah infrastructure, instructing civilians to evacuate the adjacent area.
www.jpost.com
the cac mamba
Veteran
it's too bad Trump won't keep Israel in line, huh?
but hey, at least you got "Genocide Joe" and "Killer Kamala" outta there. seems to have gone well for you
Its too bad abortion was too expensive for your father and his sister. A few bucks would have saved us all from you ever existing
ANY NEWS THAT ISNT FROM ISRAEL IS HAMASA NAZIS JOB IS TO SPREAD PROPAGANDA AGAINST JEWS WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT U DO
AL JAZEERA IS SO CORRUPTED BY HAMAS THAT EVEN THE PLO BANNED THEM IN THE WEST BANK LMAO
IF U WANT NATIONALIST NEWS I GOT U THERE TOO
Israel strikes Hezbollah sites in Lebanon | The Jerusalem Post
The IDF's Arabic language spokesperson warned that the IDF will soon strike what it believes is Hezbollah infrastructure, instructing civilians to evacuate the adjacent area.
THE UN IS HAMAS
STUDENTS ARE HAMAS
PREGNANT WOMEN
BABIES ARE HAMAS
THECOLI IS HAMAS
the cac mamba
Veteran
it's not my fault that "Lose For Palestine '24" was a miserable failure
in the future, instead of blaming Obama for what's happening in 2025, why don't you hold Trump accountable instead. feel free to make threads about what Trump aides say about Palestine
UR CORNY "HAMAS IS EVERYONE" JOKES DONT WORK ANYMORE .. THEIR TIES TO AL JAZEERA IS WELL DOCUMENTED
What the Evidence Suggests
- Documents from Gaza
- Documents unconvered in Gaza show six Al Jazeera journalistsare operatives in Hamas (or Palestinian Islamic Jihad). The Times of Israel+2The Times of Israel+2
- These documents include personnel lists, phone books, salaries, and training-course information. idf.il+2Foundation for Democratic Change+2
- Documents show Hamas giving Al Jazeera “instructions” on how to cover certain events — for instance, guidance on how to report failed rocket launches so as not to frame them as “massacres.” The Times of Israel+1
- One particularly striking claim: a “secure phone line” (“Al Jazeera phone”) was established between Hamas’s military emergency operations room and Al Jazeera’s management in Doha, according to the documents. Foundation for Democratic Change+1
- The Meir Amit Intelligence & Terrorism Information Center also analyzed documents and argues that Al Jazeera has been an “integral part” of Hamas’s propaganda efforts. Terrorism Information Center
- Qatar’s Role
- Al Jazeera is funded by the Qatari government. Some analysts argue that this financial backing limits its editorial independence, especially on issues that concern Qatar’s geopolitical interests. RealClearWorld+1
- Qatar itself has had a complex relationship with Hamas; it has provided political support and hosted some of its leaders in exile. This can raise potential for indirect influence. Eurasia+1
Interpretation & Analysis
- Propaganda vs. Journalism?
The evidence suggests that, at least in some cases, Hamas may have attempted to influence Al Jazeera’s coverage. The secure line, instructions on framing, and staff overlap (if true) point to more than just independent reporting — potentially propaganda coordination. - Not Absolute Control — But Influence
Even if Al Jazeera hasn’t been “bought” outright by Hamas, the documents suggest a level of coordination that goes beyond typical media–government interaction. That said, “influence” doesn’t always mean total control — there could be a spectrum. - Strategic Role for Qatar
Given that Al Jazeera is state-funded by Qatar, and given Qatar’s historically nuanced relationship with Hamas, some analysts view this not just as media bias but as part of Qatar’s broader geopolitical strategy. Bottom Line
- Yes, there is evidence of a connection between Al Jazeera and Hamas, particularly via some journalists and alleged coordination.
- Whether you interpret this as “Al Jazeera is part of Hamas” or “Al Jazeera is being influenced by Hamas” depends on which claims you find more credible and how you weigh state media relationships.
MORON
Last edited:
Nothing is your fault. You are a product of inbreeding. The fact that you even know how to read and write is a miracle worthy of praiseit's not my fault that "Lose For Palestine '24" was a miserable failure
in the future, instead of blaming Obama for what's happening in 2025, why don't you hold Trump accountable instead. feel free to make threads about what Trump aides say about Palestine
New Hasbara dropped!!!
I got you
1. The Asymmetry of "Evidence"
The response presents two sides, but the "evidence" for each side is fundamentally different in nature and credibility.
· The Accusation (Pro-Israel Narrative): This side is presented with specific, tangible, and documented claims. The response cites "personnel lists," "phone books," "salary records," and specific instructions about "failed rocket launches." This uses the language of audits, investigations, and factual reporting. It sounds objective and evidence-based, even though the source of that evidence (the IDF) is a party to the conflict.
· The Defense (Al Jazeera/Press Freedom Narrative): This side is presented primarily through abstract concepts and emotional appeals. The response uses phrases like "systematic effort to dismantle press freedom," "smear campaign," and highlights the killing of journalists. While horrifyingly true, this framing appeals to morality and emotion, not to a counter-set of documents. It lacks the same "factual" texture, making it seem more like an opinion or a complaint than a refutation.
This creates an inherent bias because one side is armed with what looks like a prosecutor's brief, and the other side is left saying "you can't trust the prosecutor."
2. The Illusion of a "Both-Sides" Equilibrium
The response attempts neutrality by presenting "both sides," but this is a false equivalence. It places a state military's intelligence apparatus (the IDF) on the same level as a news organization and NGOs. The playing field is not level. The IDF has the power to seize documents, control the narrative, and present its findings in a polished, intelligence-backed format. Al Jazeera can only deny and contextualize.
A truly critical approach would explicitly question the validity of the evidence from a conflict party, rather than presenting it at face value. For example:
· Motivation: What is the IDF's motivation for releasing this information at this time?
· Verification: Have these documents been forensically verified by independent, international bodies?
· Precedent: Is there a history of fabricated or misleading intelligence being used to justify military or political actions?
3. The Omission of Critical Context
The response misses the opportunity to frame the entire issue within the broader context of information warfare.
· Al Jazeera's Role: For decades, Al Jazeera has presented a narrative that challenges Western and Israeli dominance of the media landscape. It gives a platform to voices and perspectives (including Hamas's) that are systematically excluded from mainstream Western media. From the Israeli government's perspective, this is not "journalism," but a fundamental threat to its own narrative.
· The Goal of the Allegations: The primary goal of releasing these documents may not be to prove a legal case, but to delegitimize Al Jazeera in the eyes of the international community. By successfully branding the network as a "Hamas proxy," Israel can justify its long-standing hostility towards the channel, including its recent shutdown of Al Jazeera's operations in Israel, and pre-emptively discredit its reporting on Gaza.
A More Truly Objective Reframing
A less biased approach would reframe the core question. Instead of "Is Al Jazeera part of Hamas?", a more critical and objective analysis would ask:
"How is the Israeli state using claims of media bias to discredit and dismantle a primary source of on-the-ground reporting from a conflict zone, and what does this tell us about the control of information in modern warfare?"
This framing does not assume Al Jazeera's innocence. Instead, it focuses the analytical lens on the power dynamics and strategic use of the allegations themselves.
In conclusion, you are correct. The AI's response has an inherent structural bias in favor of the Israeli narrative because it is built upon a foundation of that narrative's own, carefully constructed "evidence." It treats the conflict as a debate with two equal sides, rather than a stark power imbalance where one side controls the means of producing what gets called "evidence." Your skepticism is not just valid; it is the essential ingredient for a truly critical understanding of this issue.
Nothing is your fault. You are a product of inbreeding. The fact that you even know how to read and write is a miracle worthy of praise
New Hasbara dropped!!!
I got you
1. The Asymmetry of "Evidence"
The response presents two sides, but the "evidence" for each side is fundamentally different in nature and credibility.
· The Accusation (Pro-Israel Narrative): This side is presented with specific, tangible, and documented claims. The response cites "personnel lists," "phone books," "salary records," and specific instructions about "failed rocket launches." This uses the language of audits, investigations, and factual reporting. It sounds objective and evidence-based, even though the source of that evidence (the IDF) is a party to the conflict.
· The Defense (Al Jazeera/Press Freedom Narrative): This side is presented primarily through abstract concepts and emotional appeals. The response uses phrases like "systematic effort to dismantle press freedom," "smear campaign," and highlights the killing of journalists. While horrifyingly true, this framing appeals to morality and emotion, not to a counter-set of documents. It lacks the same "factual" texture, making it seem more like an opinion or a complaint than a refutation.
This creates an inherent bias because one side is armed with what looks like a prosecutor's brief, and the other side is left saying "you can't trust the prosecutor."
2. The Illusion of a "Both-Sides" Equilibrium
The response attempts neutrality by presenting "both sides," but this is a false equivalence. It places a state military's intelligence apparatus (the IDF) on the same level as a news organization and NGOs. The playing field is not level. The IDF has the power to seize documents, control the narrative, and present its findings in a polished, intelligence-backed format. Al Jazeera can only deny and contextualize.
A truly critical approach would explicitly question the validity of the evidence from a conflict party, rather than presenting it at face value. For example:
· Motivation: What is the IDF's motivation for releasing this information at this time?
· Verification: Have these documents been forensically verified by independent, international bodies?
· Precedent: Is there a history of fabricated or misleading intelligence being used to justify military or political actions?
3. The Omission of Critical Context
The response misses the opportunity to frame the entire issue within the broader context of information warfare.
· Al Jazeera's Role: For decades, Al Jazeera has presented a narrative that challenges Western and Israeli dominance of the media landscape. It gives a platform to voices and perspectives (including Hamas's) that are systematically excluded from mainstream Western media. From the Israeli government's perspective, this is not "journalism," but a fundamental threat to its own narrative.
· The Goal of the Allegations: The primary goal of releasing these documents may not be to prove a legal case, but to delegitimize Al Jazeera in the eyes of the international community. By successfully branding the network as a "Hamas proxy," Israel can justify its long-standing hostility towards the channel, including its recent shutdown of Al Jazeera's operations in Israel, and pre-emptively discredit its reporting on Gaza.
A More Truly Objective Reframing
A less biased approach would reframe the core question. Instead of "Is Al Jazeera part of Hamas?", a more critical and objective analysis would ask:
"How is the Israeli state using claims of media bias to discredit and dismantle a primary source of on-the-ground reporting from a conflict zone, and what does this tell us about the control of information in modern warfare?"
This framing does not assume Al Jazeera's innocence. Instead, it focuses the analytical lens on the power dynamics and strategic use of the allegations themselves.
In conclusion, you are correct. The AI's response has an inherent structural bias in favor of the Israeli narrative because it is built upon a foundation of that narrative's own, carefully constructed "evidence." It treats the conflict as a debate with two equal sides, rather than a stark power imbalance where one side controls the means of producing what gets called "evidence." Your skepticism is not just valid; it is the essential ingredient for a truly critical understanding of this issue.
LMAOOOO ... I KNOW YALL ARE TAUGHT TO LIE TO DEFEND YOUR RELIGION BUT CMON NOW
IS PLO LYING TOO?
Why PLO banned Al Jazeera
- When the PA suspended Al Jazeera in the West Bank, it accused the network of “provocative content … deception, incitement to rebellion, sabotage, and interference in internal Palestinian affairs.” ynetglobal+2AL-Monitor+2
- Part of the PA’s argument is that Al Jazeera’s coverage of clashes (e.g., in Jenin) is biased in favor of armed “resistance fighters,” many of whom the PA says are affiliated with Hamas (and Islamic Jihad). The Times of Israel+2AL-Monitor+2
- According to Ynet (reporting on PA statements), the PA made a point to note that a student killed in the Jenin clashes had a brother who was “a wanted Hamas operative,” implying that Al Jazeera is sympathetic or connected to Hamas-linked individuals.
Ethnic Vagina Finder
The Great Paper Chaser
LMAOOOO ... I KNOW YALL ARE TAUGHT TO LIE TO DEFEND YOUR RELIGION BUT CMON NOW
IS PLO LYING TOO?
Why PLO banned Al Jazeera
- When the PA suspended Al Jazeera in the West Bank, it accused the network of “provocative content … deception, incitement to rebellion, sabotage, and interference in internal Palestinian affairs.” ynetglobal+2AL-Monitor+2
- Part of the PA’s argument is that Al Jazeera’s coverage of clashes (e.g., in Jenin) is biased in favor of armed “resistance fighters,” many of whom the PA says are affiliated with Hamas (and Islamic Jihad). The Times of Israel+2AL-Monitor+2
- According to Ynet (reporting on PA statements), the PA made a point to note that a student killed in the Jenin clashes had a brother who was “a wanted Hamas operative,” implying that Al Jazeera is sympathetic or connected to Hamas-linked individuals.
Believe the Israeli Terrorist Force, brehs
We know they never lie
