Feelings aside on what you think of the people, simply discuss the analysis.


SameWatching when I get off
Watching when I get off
basically said Tariq did was adequate of a job as he could have within the constraints.Cliff notes
basically said Tariq did was adequate of a job as he could have within the constraints.
Thread title is misleading and click-baity. Basically the podcast was about the Jared guy.
well some people are gonna come in here with the expectation that Jason "WENT IN ON" Tariq, based off thread title. Im just saying he was really breaking down that Taylor guy more than anythingHow is the title click baity when he was literally talking about the debate vs when he met with jared and giving the reasons certain convos happene how they did.
well some people are gonna come in here with the expectation that Jason "WENT IN ON" Tariq, based off thread title. Im just saying he was really breaking down that Taylor guy more than anything
Jason black analysis was very similar to mine. What black offered though was that taylor was interjecting points into the conversation he knew was incorrect, and it goes back to what I felt, you have these white supremacist who single out particular activist because they know their depth of knowledge is limited. Only people who can feel tariq lost the debate though, are simply individuals who don't have a great grasp on historical facts. Their information goes as far as social media memes and instagram snapchat clips teach them. That's OK when you back and forth with white supremacist on Facebook, who wealth of knowledge is limited as well, but when you encounter the more advanced white supremacist, they manipulate the based on that fact.
yea they learning from us, all while criticizing us on our position.I liked how he brought up the whole Identitarism stuff they use now to code their feelings and how it was influenced from Black/African Identitarism of the past.