Jeff Bezos says Washington Post opinion pages will now defend free market and ‘personal liberties’

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
19,272
Reputation
8,165
Daps
94,437

Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos says opinion pages will defend free market and ‘personal liberties’​

The billionaire owner of The Washington Post, Jeff Bezos, narrowed the topics covered by its opinion section Wednesday to defending personal liberties and the free market, a pivot away from its traditional broad focus and prompting the news outlet’s opinion editor to resign.
Bezos, who also is the founder and largest individual shareholder of Amazon, said on X that “viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.”
The move was received by some as an indication that Bezos is making decisions for the storied news outlet with an eye toward avoiding retaliation by President Donald Trump. Bezos, though, cast the change as a modernization from the days when newspapers offered opinions on a broad range of topics. Now, he said, “the internet does that job.”
“We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets,” Bezos wrote in his post, adding that the new topics “are right for America. I also believe that these viewpoints are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion.” Opinions editor David Shipley resigned rather than lead the shift, Bezos said.
“I suggested to him that if the answer wasn’t `hell yes,’ then it had to be `no.’ After careful consideration, David decided to step away,” Bezos wrote.
The pivot echoes the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page banner: “free markets, free people.”


Many changes have come to the Post of late​

The move Wednesday was the latest in a series of Bezos’ changes to the legacy news outlet, an award-winning organization that broke the Watergate scandal and whose motto is, “Democracy Dies in Darkness.”
Weeks before the November election, Bezos announced that the Post would not endorse a presidential candidate, sparking a wave of resignations and thousands of subscription cancellations. The Post’s editorial staff had been prepared to endorse Democrat Kamala Harris before publisher Will Lewis wrote instead that it would be better for readers to make up their own minds. Bezos defended the decision by saying in “a note from our owner” that editorial endorsements create a perception of bias at a time many Americans don’t believe the media, and do nothing to tip the scales of an election.
In January, cartoonist Ann Telnaes quit after an editor rejected her sketch of Bezos and other media executives bowing before Trump — after The Washington Post editor was seen with other executives at Trump’s Florida club Mar-a-Lago.
Last June, Sally Buzbee resigned as executive editor rather than lead a new division as part of a plan to split the newsroom into three separate divisions. The hastily announced restructuring was aimed stopping an exodus of readers in recent years. The new plan included a new division devoted to attracting consumers through innovative uses of social media, video, artificial intelligence and sales.

The reaction came quickly​

Some of Trump’s top allies tweeted their support for Bezos’ move.
“Bravo, @JeffBezos!” posted fellow billionaire Elon Musk. Added conservative commentator Charlie Kirk: “Good! The culture is changing rapidly for the better.”
Bezos’ opponents said it was evidence that Bezos was moving the outlet toward Trump and the interests of billionaires.
“This is what Oligarch ownership of the media looks like,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., posted on X, Musk’s platform “The second-richest guy in the world, Bezos, owns The Washington Post. He has now declared that the editorial page of that paper is going Trump right-wing. Surprise, Mr. Musk agrees. We must support independent media.”
Marty Baron, Buzbee’s predecessor at the paper, told The Daily Beast in remarks published Wednesday there was “no doubt in my mind” that Bezos was prioritizing his business interests over The Washington Post.
Bezos bought the broadsheet and other newspapers in 2013 for $250 million in a surprise move viewed as a demonstration of how the Internet has created winners and losers and transformed the media landscape.

The narrowing of topics will be obvious. On the Post’s homepage Wednesday afternoon, headlines linking to opinion material included “Your showerhead is lying to you” and “What we learned about politics by talking about ... wolves.”

LAURIE KELLMAN

Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos says opinion pages will defend free market and 'personal liberties'
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
56,575
Reputation
15,640
Daps
209,224
Reppin
Above the fray.

Strapped

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
47,226
Reputation
4,256
Daps
59,199
Reppin
404
Oh really , news media only post propaganda & misinformation. They keep the public dumb
 
Last edited:

Yinny

Sweet and Sour Patch Mom
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
16,324
Reputation
3,813
Daps
41,866
Reppin
Shangri-La
In a time of eroding trust in media, he’s going to step out publicly to re-confirm why even longstanding journalistic outlets shouldn’t be trusted.
 

Goat poster

KANG LIFE
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
20,116
Reputation
3,678
Daps
87,772
We live in a dystopian society.

Between this and Trump signing executive orders 'investigating" reporters that defy him.

Yeah we are slowly walking into non democracy

I'd argue that we may be already there
 

Swirv

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
17,586
Reputation
3,010
Daps
55,546
He’s a p*ssy like the rest. Scared of retribution from trump. That’s how authoritarians increase power, scare the public into silence. As a semi-powerful person himself, bezos should’ve let his nuts hang and given Washington post free rein.
 

CopiousX

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
13,745
Reputation
4,635
Daps
67,345
He’s a p*ssy like the rest. Scared of retribution from trump. That’s how authoritarians increase power, scare the public into silence. As a semi-powerful person himself, bezos should’ve let his nuts hang and given Washington post free rein.
EvenThe mightiest elephant still flees from a snake

Bezos' whole existence depends on China. Trump could single handedly half his net worth overnight with more tariffs and Amazon would collapse as a result. Even worse, his biggest AWS client is the US government

Elon at least has domestic demand. While Trump could theoretically cut off his government contracts; the vast majority of his wealth isn't in the government. He doesn't even need carbon credits to sustain his wealth.
 

Swirv

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
17,586
Reputation
3,010
Daps
55,546
EvenThe mightiest elephant still flees from a snake

Bezos' whole existence depends on China. Trump could single handedly half his net worth overnight with more tariffs and Amazon would collapse as a result. Even worse, his biggest AWS client is the US government

Elon at least has domestic demand. While Trump could theoretically cut off his government contracts; the vast majority of his wealth isn't in the government. He doesn't even need carbon credits to sustain his wealth.
Bond vigilantes have already made their presence known, trump had to fall back on the tariffs as a result, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2025-04-24/how-bond-vigilantes-made-trump-blink-video

I didn’t know U.S. departments were such a large revenue source for AWS, I still think he should’ve given WP leeway with editorial decisions considering it’s a first amendment matter.
 
Top